What gravity mediated entanglement can really tell us about quantum gravity

B. S. DeWitt, Quantum theory of gravity. iii. applications of the covariant theory, Phys. Rev. 162

1967

Earlier work this paper cites.

G. Vidal and R. F. Werner, Computable measure of entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 65

2002

Earlier work this paper cites.

B. Reznik, Entanglement from the vacuum, Foundations of Phys. 33

2003

Earlier work this paper cites.

M. Revzen, P. A. Mello, A. Mann, and L. M. Johansen, Bell’s inequality violation with non-negative wigner functions, Phys. Rev. A 71

2005

Earlier work this paper cites.

D. R. Terno, Inconsistency of quantum—classical dynamics, and what it implies, Found. Phys. 36

2006

Earlier work this paper cites.

C. Barceló, R. Carballo-Rubio, L. J. Garay, and R. Gómez-Escalante, Hybrid classical-quantum formulations ask for hybrid notions, Phys. Rev. A 86

2012

Earlier work this paper cites.

A. Mari and J. Eisert, Positive wigner functions render classical simulation of quantum computation efficient, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109

2012

Earlier work this paper cites.

A. Pozas-Kerstjens and E. Martín-Martínez, Harvesting correlations from the quantum vacuum, Phys. Rev. D 92

2015

Earlier work this paper cites.

S. Bose, A. Mazumdar, G. W. Morley, H. Ulbricht, M. Toroš, M. Paternostro, A. A. Geraci, P. F. Barker, M. S. Kim, and G. Milburn, Spin entanglement witness for quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119

2017

Earlier work this paper cites.

C. Marletto and V. Vedral, Gravitationally induced entanglement between two massive particles is sufficient evidence of quantum effects in gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119

2017

Earlier work this paper cites.

C. Anastopoulos and B.-L. Hu, Comment on ”A Spin Entanglement Witness for Quantum Gravity” and on “Gravitationally Induced Entanglement between Two Massive Particles is Sufficient Evidence of Quantum Effects in Gravity” (2018), arXiv:1804.11315

Original

2018

Earlier work this paper cites.

M. J. W. Hall and M. Reginatto, On two recent proposals for witnessing nonclassical gravity, J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 51

2018

Earlier work this paper cites.

C. Marletto and V. Vedral, When can gravity path-entangle two spatially superposed masses?, Phys. Rev. D 98

2018

Cited alongside, same era.

M. Christodoulou and C. Rovelli, On the possibility of laboratory evidence for quantum superposition of geometries, Phys. Lett. B 792

2019

Cited alongside, same era.

M. Christodoulou and C. Rovelli, On the possibility of experimental detection of the discreteness of time, Front. Phys. 8

2020

Cited alongside, same era.

R. J. Marshman, A. Mazumdar, and S. Bose, Locality and entanglement in table-top testing of the quantum nature of linearized gravity, Phys. Rev. A 101

2020

Cited alongside, same era.

R. Faure, T. R. Perche, and B. d. S. L. Torres, Particle detectors as witnesses for quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 101

2020

Cited alongside, same era.

E. Tjoa and E. Martín-Martínez, When entanglement harvesting is not really harvesting, Phys. Rev. D 104

2021

Later among the works it cites.

J. S. Pedernales, K. Streltsov, and M. B. Plenio, Enhancing gravitational interaction between quantum systems by a massive mediator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128

2022

Closest in time.

H. Rudolph, U. c. v. Delić, M. Aspelmeyer, K. Hornberger, and B. A. Stickler, Force-gradient sensing and entanglement via feedback cooling of interacting nanoparticles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129

2022

Closest in time.

J. Hofer, G. Higgins, H. Huebl, O. F. Kieler, R. Kleiner, D. Koelle, P. Schmidt, J. A. Slater, M. Trupke, K. Uhl, T. Weimann, W. Wieczorek, F. Wulschner, and M. Aspelmeyer, High-q magnetic levitation and control of superconducting microspheres at millikelvin temperatures (2022), arXiv:2211.06289 [quant-ph]

Original

2022

Closest in time.