Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Quasicircular binary black hole mergers are described by 15 parameters, of which gravitational wave observations can typically constrain only $\sim 10$ independent combinations to varying degree.
C. Cutler and É. E. Flanagan, Gravitational waves from merging compact binaries: How accurately can one extract the binary’s parameters from the inspiral waveform?, Phys. Rev. D 49
1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. A. Apostolatos, C. Cutler, G. J. Sussman, and K. S. Thorne, Spin-induced orbital precession and its modulation of the gravitational waveforms from merging binaries, Physical Review D 49
1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. E. Kidder, Coalescing binary systems of compact objects to (post OPEN ) 5 / 2 {)}^{5/2} -Newtonian order. V. Spin effects, Phys. Rev. D 52
1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Jaranowski and A. Królak, Gravitational-wave data analysis. formalism and sample applications: The gaussian case, Living Reviews in Relativity 8
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. R. Brady and S. Fairhurst, Interpreting the results of searches for gravitational waves from coalescing binaries, Classical and Quantum Gravity 25
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Fairhurst, Triangulation of gravitational wave sources with a network of detectors, New Journal of Physics 11
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Feroz, M. P. Hobson, and M. Bridges, MultiNest: an efficient and robust bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 398
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Veitch and A. Vecchio, Bayesian coherent analysis of in-spiral gravitational wave signals with a detector network, Phys. Rev. D 81
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. T. Whelan, Visualization of antenna pattern factors via projected detector tensors, https://dcc.ligo.org/public/0068/T1100431/002/projectedTensor.pdf (2012)
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. T. Whelan, The geometry of gravitational wave detection, https://dcc.ligo.org/public/0106/T1300666/003/Whelan_geometry.pdf (2013)
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. J. Cornish, Fast Fisher matrices and lazy likelihoods (2013), arXiv:1007.4820 [gr-qc]
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Acernese et al. , Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector, Classical and Quantum Gravity 32
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Farr, E. Ochsner, W. M. Farr, and R. O’Shaughnessy, A more effective coordinate system for parameter estimation of precessing compact binaries from gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 90
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Buchner, A. Georgakakis, K. Nandra, L. Hsu, C. Rangel, M. Brightman, A. Merloni, M. Salvato, J. Donley, and D. Kocevski, X-ray spectral modelling of the AGN obscuring region in the CDFS: Bayesian model selection and catalogue, Astronomy & Astrophysics 564
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Aasi et al. , Advanced LIGO, Classical and Quantum Gravity 32
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Veitch, V. Raymond, B. Farr, W. Farr, P. Graff, S. Vitale, B. Aylott, K. Blackburn, N. Christensen, M. Coughlin, W. Del Pozzo, F. Feroz, J. Gair, C.-J. Haster, V. Kalogera, T. Littenberg, I. Mandel, R. O’Shaughnessy, M. Pitkin, C. Rodriguez, C. Röver, T. Sidery, R. Smith, M. Van Der Sluys, A. Vecchio, W. Vousden, and L. Wade, Parameter estimation for compact binaries with ground-based gravitational-wave observations using the LALInference software library, Phys. Rev. D 91
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. J. Cornish and T. B. Littenberg, Bayeswave: Bayesian inference for gravitational wave bursts and instrument glitches, Classical and Quantum Gravity 32
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Schmidt, F. Ohme, and M. Hannam, Towards models of gravitational waveforms from generic binaries: II. modelling precession effects with a single effective precession parameter, Phys. Rev. D 91
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Pankow, P. Brady, E. Ochsner, and R. O’Shaughnessy, Novel scheme for rapid parallel parameter estimation of gravitational waves from compact binary coalescences, Phys. Rev. D 92
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), GW151226: Observation of gravitational waves from a 22-solar-mass binary black hole coalescence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. P. Singer and L. R. Price, Rapid bayesian position reconstruction for gravitational-wave transients, Phys. Rev. D 93
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Bohé, M. Hannam, S. Husa, F. Ohme, M. Pürrer, and P. Schmidt, PhenomPv2 - technical notes for the LAL implementation, https://dcc.ligo.org/public/0122/T1500602/004/PhenomPv2_technicalnotes.pdf (2016)
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Sharma, Markov chain monte carlo methods for bayesian data analysis in astronomy, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 55
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Schmidt, I. W. Harry, and H. P. Pfeiffer, Numerical relativity injection infrastructure (2017)
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. W. Hogg and D. Foreman-Mackey, Data analysis recipes: Using markov chain monte carlo, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 236
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
LIGO Scientific Collaboration, LIGO Algorithm Library (2018)
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Lange, R. O’Shaughnessy, and M. Rizzo, Rapid and accurate parameter inference for coalescing, precessing compact binaries (2018)
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
B. Farr, D. E. Holz, and W. M. Farr, Using spin to understand the formation of LIGO and Virgo’s black holes, The Astrophysical Journal 854
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
P. Virtanen et al. , SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python, Nature Methods 17
2020
Later among the works it cites.
S. Fairhurst, R. Green, M. Hannam, and C. Hoy, When will we observe binary black holes precessing?, Phys. Rev. D 102
2020
Later among the works it cites.
B. Zackay, L. Dai, T. Venumadhav, J. Roulet, and M. Zaldarriaga, Detecting gravitational waves with disparate detector responses: Two new binary black hole mergers, Phys. Rev. D 104
2021
Later among the works it cites.
A. H. Nitz, C. D. Capano, S. Kumar, Y.-F. Wang, S. Kastha, M. Schäfer, R. Dhurkunde, and M. Cabero, 3-OGC: Catalog of gravitational waves from compact-binary mergers, The Astrophysical Journal 922
2021
Later among the works it cites.
G. Pratten, C. García-Quirós, M. Colleoni, A. Ramos-Buades, H. Estellés, M. Mateu-Lucena, R. Jaume, M. Haney, D. Keitel, J. E. Thompson, and S. Husa, Computationally efficient models for the dominant and subdominant harmonic modes of precessing binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D 103
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
D. Gerosa, E. Berti, R. O’Shaughnessy, K. Belczynski, M. Kesden, D. Wysocki, and W. Gladysz, Spin orientations of merging black holes formed from the evolution of stellar binaries, Phys. Rev. D 98
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Smith and E. Thrane, Optimal search for an astrophysical gravitational-wave background, Phys. Rev. X 8
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), GWTC-1: A gravitational-wave transient catalog of compact binary mergers observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first and second observing runs, Phys. Rev. X 9
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
A. H. Nitz, C. Capano, A. B. Nielsen, S. Reyes, R. White, D. A. Brown, and B. Krishnan, 1-OGC: The first open gravitational-wave catalog of binary mergers from analysis of public advanced LIGO data, The Astrophysical Journal 872
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
B. Zackay, T. Venumadhav, L. Dai, J. Roulet, and M. Zaldarriaga, Highly spinning and aligned binary black hole merger in the advanced LIGO first observing run, Phys. Rev. D 100
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
V. Varma, S. E. Field, M. A. Scheel, J. Blackman, D. Gerosa, L. C. Stein, L. E. Kidder, and H. P. Pfeiffer, Surrogate models for precessing binary black hole simulations with unequal masses, Phys. Rev. Research 1
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Roulet, L. Dai, T. Venumadhav, B. Zackay, and M. Zaldarriaga, Template bank for compact binary coalescence searches in gravitational wave data: A general geometric placement algorithm, Phys. Rev. D 99
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
2021
Later among the works it cites.
T. A. Callister, A thesaurus for common priors in gravitational-wave astronomy (2021)
2021
Later among the works it cites.
G. Ashton and C. Talbot, Bilby-MCMC: An MCMC sampler for gravitational-wave inference, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 10.1093/mnras/stab2236 (2021)
2021
Later among the works it cites.
N. J. Cornish, Heterodyned likelihood for rapid gravitational wave parameter inference, Phys. Rev. D 104
2021
Later among the works it cites.
N. Leslie, L. Dai, and G. Pratten, Mode-by-mode relative binning: Fast likelihood estimation for gravitational waveforms with spin-orbit precession and multiple harmonics, Phys. Rev. D 104
2021
Later among the works it cites.
D. M. Macleod, J. S. Areeda, S. B. Coughlin, T. J. Massinger, and A. L. Urban, GWpy: A Python package for gravitational-wave astrophysics, SoftwareX 13
2021
Later among the works it cites.
D. Gerosa, M. Mould, D. Gangardt, P. Schmidt, G. Pratten, and L. M. Thomas, A generalized precession parameter χ p {\chi}_{\mathrm{p}} to interpret gravitational-wave data, Phys. Rev. D 103
2021
Later among the works it cites.
L. M. Thomas, P. Schmidt, and G. Pratten, New effective precession spin for modeling multimodal gravitational waveforms in the strong-field regime, Phys. Rev. D 103
2021
Later among the works it cites.
D. Gangardt, N. Steinle, M. Kesden, D. Gerosa, and E. Stoikos, A taxonomy of black-hole binary spin precession and nutation, Phys. Rev. D 103
2021
Later among the works it cites.
S. Biscoveanu, M. Isi, V. Varma, and S. Vitale, Measuring the spins of heavy binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D 104
2021
Later among the works it cites.
M. Hannam, C. Hoy, J. E. Thompson, S. Fairhurst, and V. Raymond, Measurement of general-relativistic precession in a black-hole binary (2021)
2021
Later among the works it cites.
C. Hoy, C. Mills, and S. Fairhurst, Evidence for subdominant multipole moments and precession in merging black-hole-binaries from GWTC-2.1 (2021)
2021
Later among the works it cites.
T. Islam, S. E. Field, C.-J. Haster, and R. Smith, Improved analysis of gw190412 with a precessing numerical relativity surrogate waveform model, Phys. Rev. D 103
2021
Later among the works it cites.
S. Olsen, J. Roulet, H. S. Chia, L. Dai, T. Venumadhav, B. Zackay, and M. Zaldarriaga, Mapping the likelihood of GW190521 with diverse mass and spin priors, Phys. Rev. D 104
2021
Later among the works it cites.
M. Dax, S. R. Green, J. Gair, J. H. Macke, A. Buonanno, and B. Schölkopf, Real-time gravitational wave science with neural posterior estimation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127
2021
Later among the works it cites.
S. Olsen, T. Venumadhav, J. Mushkin, J. Roulet, B. Zackay, and M. Zaldarriaga, New binary black hole mergers in the LIGO–Virgo O3a data, Phys. Rev. D 106
2022
Closest in time.
V. Varma, M. Isi, S. Biscoveanu, W. M. Farr, and S. Vitale, Measuring binary black hole orbital-plane spin orientations, Phys. Rev. D 105
2022
Closest in time.
E. Lee, S. Morisaki, and H. Tagoshi, Mass–spin re-parameterization for rapid parameter estimation of inspiral gravitational-wave signals (2022)
2022
Closest in time.
H. S. Chia, S. Olsen, J. Roulet, L. Dai, T. Venumadhav, B. Zackay, and M. Zaldarriaga, Signs of higher multipoles and orbital precession in GW151226, Phys. Rev. D 106
2022
Closest in time.