Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Quantum computers offer the possibility to implement lattice gauge theory in Minkowski rather than Euclidean spacetime, thus allowing calculations of processes that evolve in real time.
R. Lewis and R. M. Woloshyn, A qubit model for U(1) lattice gauge theory, arXiv:1905.09789
1905
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Lloyd, Universal quantum simulators, Science 273
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Chandrasekharan and U. J. Wiese, Quantum link models: A Discrete approach to gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B 492
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Mathur, Harmonic oscillator prepotentials in SU(2) lattice gauge theory, J. Phys. A 38
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Hatano and M. Suzuki, Finding Exponential Product Formulas of Higher Orders, Lect. Notes Phys. 679
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Byrnes and Y. Yamamoto, Simulating lattice gauge theories on a quantum computer, Phys. Rev. A 73
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Banerjee, M. Bögli, M. Dalmonte, E. Rico, P. Stebler, U. J. Wiese and P. Zoller, Atomic Quantum Simulation of U(N) and SU(N) Non-Abelian Lattice Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Tagliacozzo, A. Celi, P. Orland and M. Lewenstein, Simulations of non-Abelian gauge theories with optical lattices, Nature Commun. 4
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Zohar, J. I. Cirac and B. Reznik, Cold-Atom Quantum Simulator for SU(2) Yang-Mills Lattice Gauge Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Zohar, J. I. Cirac and B. Reznik, Quantum simulations of gauge theories with ultracold atoms: local gauge invariance from angular momentum conservation, Phys. Rev. A 88
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Stannigel, P. Hauke, D. Marcos, M. Hafezi, S. Diehl, M. Dalmonte and P. Zoller, Constrained dynamics via the Zeno effect in quantum simulation: Implementing non-Abelian lattice gauge theories with cold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Anishetty and I. Raychowdhury, SU(2) lattice gauge theory: Local dynamics on nonintersecting electric flux loops, Phys. Rev. D 90
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Zohar and M. Burrello, Formulation of lattice gauge theories for quantum simulations, Phys. Rev. D 91
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Mezzacapo, E. Rico, C. Sabín, I. L. Egusquiza, L. Lamata and E. Solano, Non-Abelian S U ( 2 ) SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theories in Superconducting Circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. J. Wallman and J. Emerson, Noise Tailoring for Scalable Quantum Computation via Randomized Compiling, Phys. Rev. A 94
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Aoki, Y. Aoki, D. Becirevic, C. Bernard, T. Blum, G. Colangelo, M. Della Morte, P. Dimopoulos, S. Dürr and H. Fukaya, et al
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Silvi, E. Rico, M. Dalmonte, F. Tschirsich and S. Montangero, Finite-density phase diagram of a (1+1)-d non-abelian lattice gauge theory with tensor networks, Quantum 1
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
M. C. Bañuls, K. Cichy, J. I. Cirac, K. Jansen and S. Kühn, Efficient basis formulation for 1+1 dimensional SU(2) lattice gauge theory: Spectral calculations with matrix product states, Phys. Rev. X 7
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Li and S.C. Benjamin, Efficient Variational Quantum Simulator Incorporating Active Error Minimization, Phys. Rev X 7
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
D. Banerjee, F. J. Jiang, T. Z. Olesen, P. Orland and U. J. Wiese, From the S U ( 2 ) SU(2) quantum link model on the honeycomb lattice to the quantum dimer model on the kagomé lattice: Phase transition and fractionalized flux strings, Phys. Rev. B 97
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Kan, L. Funcke, S. Kühn, L. Dellantonio, J. Zhang, J. F. Haase, C. A. Muschik and K. Jansen, Investigating a (3+1)D topological θ \theta -term in the Hamiltonian formulation of lattice gauge theories for quantum and classical simulations, Phys. Rev. D 104
2021
Later among the works it cites.
E. Zohar, Quantum simulation of lattice gauge theories in more than one space dimension—requirements, challenges and methods, Phil. Trans. A. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 380
2021
Later among the works it cites.
I. Raychowdhury, Toward quantum simulating non-Abelian gauge theories, Indian J. Phys. 95
2021
Later among the works it cites.
S. Endo, Z. Cai, S. C. Benjamin and X. Yuan, Hybrid Quantum-Classical Algorithms and Quantum Error Mitigation, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 90
2021
Later among the works it cites.
A. Strikis, D. Qin, Y. Chen, S. C. Benjamin and Y. Li, Learning-based quantum error mitigation, PRX Quantum 2
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
P. Sala, T. Shi, S. Kühn, M. C. Bañuls, E. Demler and J. I. Cirac, Variational study of U(1) and SU(2) lattice gauge theories with Gaussian states in 1+1 dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 98
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
I. Raychowdhury, Low energy spectrum of SU(2) lattice gauge theory: An alternate proposal via loop formulation, Eur. Phys. J. C 79
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
E. Zohar and J. I. Cirac, Removing Staggered Fermionic Matter in U ( N ) U(N) and S U ( N ) SU(N) Lattice Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. D 99
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
N. Klco, J. R. Stryker and M. J. Savage, SU(2) non-Abelian gauge field theory in one dimension on digital quantum computers, Phys. Rev. D 101
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
I. Raychowdhury and J. R. Stryker, Solving Gauss’s Law on Digital Quantum Computers with Loop-String-Hadron Digitization, Phys. Rev. Res. 2
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
I. Raychowdhury and J. R. Stryker, Loop, string, and hadron dynamics in SU(2) Hamiltonian lattice gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 101
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Ji et al
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
V. Kasper, G. Juzeliunas, M. Lewenstein, F. Jendrzejewski and E. Zohar, From the Jaynes–Cummings model to non-abelian gauge theories: a guided tour for the quantum engineer, New J. Phys. 22
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
2021
Later among the works it cites.
P. Czarnik, A. Arrasmith, P. J. Coles and L. Cincio, Error mitigation with Clifford quantum-circuit data, Quantum 5
2021
Later among the works it cites.
A. Lowe, M. H. Gordon, P. Czarnik, A. Arrasmith, P. J. Coles and L. Cincio, Unified approach to data-driven quantum error mitigation, Phys. Rev. Research 3
2021
Later among the works it cites.
J. Vovrosh, K. E. Khosla, S. Greenaway, C. Self, M. Kim and J. Knolle, Simple mitigation of global depolarizing errors in quantum simulations, Phys. Rev. E 104
2021
Later among the works it cites.
M. Urbanek, B. Nachman, V. R. Pascuzzi, A. He, C. W. Bauer and W. A. de Jong, Mitigating depolarizing noise on quantum computers with noise-estimation circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127
2021
Later among the works it cites.
A. Sopena, M. H. Gordon, G. Sierra and E. López, Simulating quench dynamics on a digital quantum computer with data-driven error mitigation, Quantum Sci. Technol. 6
2021
Later among the works it cites.
S. Bravyi, S. Sheldon, A. Kandala, D. C. Mckay, and J. M. Gambetta, Mitigating measurement errors in multiqubit experiments, Phys. Rev. A 103
2021
Later among the works it cites.
M. S. Anis et al., Qiskit: An Open-source Framework for Quantum Computing
2021
Later among the works it cites.
R. Dasgupta and I. Raychowdhury, Cold-atom quantum simulator for string and hadron dynamics in non-Abelian lattice gauge theory, Phys. Rev. A 105
2022
Closest in time.
N. Klco, A. Roggero and M. J. Savage, Standard Model Physics and the Digital Quantum Revolution: Thoughts about the Interface, Rept. Prog. Phys. 85
2022
Closest in time.
A. N. Ciavarella and I. A. Chernyshev, Preparation of the SU(3) lattice Yang-Mills vacuum with variational quantum methods, Phys. Rev. D 105
2022
Closest in time.
E. Rosenberg, P. Ginsparg and P. L. McMahon, Experimental error mitigation using linear rescaling for variational quantum eigensolving with up to 20 qubits, Quantum Sci. Technol. 7
2022
Closest in time.