Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Quantum simulation is at the heart of the ongoing "second" quantum revolution, with various synthetic quantum matter platforms realizing evermore exotic condensed matter and particle physics phenomena at high levels of precision and control.
D. Foerster, H.B. Nielsen, and M. Ninomiya, “Dynamical stability of local gauge symmetry creation of light from chaos,” Physics Letters B 94
1980
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields , Vol. 2: Modern Applications (Cambridge University Press, 1995)
1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. J. Hamer, Zheng Weihong, and J. Oitmaa, “Series expansions for the massive schwinger model in hamiltonian lattice theory,” Phys. Rev. D 56
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
Jochen Heitger, “Numerical simulations of gauge-higgs models on the lattice,” PhD Thesis (1997)
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
S Chandrasekharan and U.-J Wiese, “Quantum link models: A discrete approach to gauge theories,” Nuclear Physics B 492
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. B. Sidje, “ Expokit
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Facchi and S. Pascazio, “Quantum zeno subspaces,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 89
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Zee, Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell (Princeton University Press, 2003)
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Cleve Moler and Charles Van Loan, “Nineteen dubious ways to compute the exponential of a matrix, twenty-five years later,” SIAM Review 45
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Facchi, D. A. Lidar, and S. Pascazio, “Unification of dynamical decoupling and the quantum zeno effect,” Phys. Rev. A 69
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. B. Hastings and Xiao-Gang Wen, “Quasiadiabatic continuation of quantum states: The stability of topological ground-state degeneracy and emergent gauge invariance,” Phys. Rev. B 72
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Immanuel Bloch, Jean Dalibard, and Wilhelm Zwerger, “Many-body physics with ultracold gases,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 80
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Poppitz and Y. Shang, “”light from chaos” in two dimensions,” International Journal of Modern Physics A 23
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Dmitri E. Kharzeev, Larry D. McLerran, and Harmen J. Warringa, “The effects of topological charge change in heavy ion collisions: “event by event p and cp violation”,” Nuclear Physics A 803
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Kenji Fukushima, Dmitri E. Kharzeev, and Harmen J. Warringa, “Chiral magnetic effect,” Phys. Rev. D 78
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Waseem S. Bakr, Jonathon I. Gillen, Amy Peng, Simon Fölling, and Markus Greiner, “A quantum gas microscope for detecting single atoms in a hubbard-regime optical lattice,” Nature 462
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Gattringer and C. Lang, Quantum Chromodynamics on the Lattice: An Introductory Presentation , Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009)
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Paolo Facchi, Giuseppe Marmo, and Saverio Pascazio, “Quantum zeno dynamics and quantum zeno subspaces,” 196
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Erez Zohar and Benni Reznik, “Confinement and lattice quantum-electrodynamic electric flux tubes simulated with ultracold atoms,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 107
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Philipp Hauke, Fernando M Cucchietti, Luca Tagliacozzo, Ivan Deutsch, and Maciej Lewenstein, “Can one trust quantum simulators?” Reports on Progress in Physics 75
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Erez Zohar, J. Ignacio Cirac, and Benni Reznik, “Simulating compact quantum electrodynamics with ultracold atoms: Probing confinement and nonperturbative effects,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Banerjee, M. Dalmonte, M. Müller, E. Rico, P. Stebler, U.-J. Wiese, and P. Zoller, “Atomic quantum simulation of dynamical gauge fields coupled to fermionic matter: From string breaking to evolution after a quench,” Physical Review Letters 109
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. C. Bañuls, K. Cichy, J. I. Cirac, and K. Jansen, “The mass spectrum of the schwinger model with matrix product states,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2013
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Mari Carmen Bañuls, Krzysztof Cichy, J. Ignacio Cirac, Karl Jansen, and Hana Saito, “Matrix product states for lattice field theories,” (2013), 10.48550/ARXIV.1310.4118
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Banerjee, M. Bögli, M. Dalmonte, E. Rico, P. Stebler, U.-J. Wiese, and P. Zoller, “Atomic quantum simulation of 𝐔 ( n ) \mathbf{U}(n) and SU ( n ) \mathrm{SU}(n) non-abelian lattice gauge theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Hauke, D. Marcos, M. Dalmonte, and P. Zoller, “Quantum simulation of a lattice schwinger model in a chain of trapped ions,” Phys. Rev. X 3
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
U.-J. Wiese, “Ultracold quantum gases and lattice systems: quantum simulation of lattice gauge theories,” Annalen der Physik 525
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Hebenstreit, J. Berges, and D. Gelfand, “Real-time dynamics of string breaking,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 111
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Stannigel, P. Hauke, D. Marcos, M. Hafezi, S. Diehl, M. Dalmonte, and P. Zoller, “Constrained dynamics via the zeno effect in quantum simulation: Implementing non-abelian lattice gauge theories with cold atoms,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Stefan Kühn, J. Ignacio Cirac, and Mari-Carmen Bañuls, “Quantum simulation of the schwinger model: A study of feasibility,” Phys. Rev. A 90
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Erez Zohar, J Ignacio Cirac, and Benni Reznik, “Quantum simulations of lattice gauge theories using ultracold atoms in optical lattices,” Reports on Progress in Physics 79
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Saito, M. C. Bañuls, K. Cichy, J. I. Cirac, and K. Jansen, “Thermal evolution of the one-flavour schwinger model using matrix product states,” (2015), 10.48550/ARXIV.1511.00794
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Yoshihito Kuno, Kenichi Kasamatsu, Yoshiro Takahashi, Ikuo Ichinose, and Tetsuo Matsui, “Real-time dynamics and proposal for feasible experiments of lattice gauge–higgs model simulated by cold atoms,” New Journal of Physics 17
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Bazavov, Y. Meurice, S.-W. Tsai, J. Unmuth-Yockey, and Jin Zhang, “Gauge-invariant implementation of the abelian-higgs model on optical lattices,” Phys. Rev. D 92
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Mezzacapo, E. Rico, C. Sabín, I. L. Egusquiza, L. Lamata, and E. Solano, “Non-abelian su(2) lattice gauge theories in superconducting circuits,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Dalmonte and S. Montangero, “Lattice gauge theory simulations in the quantum information era,” Contemporary Physics 57
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Mari Carmen Bañuls, Krzysztof Cichy, Karl Jansen, and Hana Saito, “Chiral condensate in the schwinger model with matrix product operators,” Phys. Rev. D 93
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Esteban A. Martinez, Christine A. Muschik, Philipp Schindler, Daniel Nigg, Alexander Erhard, Markus Heyl, Philipp Hauke, Marcello Dalmonte, Thomas Monz, Peter Zoller, and Rainer Blatt, “Real-time dynamics of lattice gauge theories with a few-qubit quantum computer,” Nature 534
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Dayou Yang, Gouri Shankar Giri, Michael Johanning, Christof Wunderlich, Peter Zoller, and Philipp Hauke, “Analog quantum simulation of ( 1 + 1 ) (1+1) -dimensional lattice qed with trapped ions,” Phys. Rev. A 94
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Natalie Klco, Martin J. Savage, and Jesse R. Stryker, “Su(2) non-abelian gauge field theory in one dimension on digital quantum computers,” Phys. Rev. D 101
2020
Later among the works it cites.
Alexander Mil, Torsten V. Zache, Apoorva Hegde, Andy Xia, Rohit P. Bhatt, Markus K. Oberthaler, Philipp Hauke, Jürgen Berges, and Fred Jendrzejewski, “A scalable realization of local u(1) gauge invariance in cold atomic mixtures,” Science 367
2020
Later among the works it cites.
João C. Pinto Barros, Michele Burrello, and Andrea Trombettoni, “Gauge theories with ultracold atoms,” in Strongly Coupled Field Theories for Condensed Matter and Quantum Information Theory , edited by Alvaro Ferraz, Kumar S. Gupta, Gordon Walter Semenoff, and Pasquale Sodano (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020) pp. 217–245
2020
Later among the works it cites.
D. González-Cuadra, A. Dauphin, P. R. Grzybowski, M. Lewenstein, and A. Bermudez, “Dynamical solitons and boson fractionalization in cold-atom topological insulators,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
D.E. Kharzeev, J. Liao, S.A. Voloshin, and G. Wang, “Chiral magnetic and vortical effects in high-energy nuclear collisions—a status report,” Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 88
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Hannes Bernien, Sylvain Schwartz, Alexander Keesling, Harry Levine, Ahmed Omran, Hannes Pichler, Soonwon Choi, Alexander S. Zibrov, Manuel Endres, Markus Greiner, Vladan Vuletić, and Mikhail D. Lukin, “Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator,” Nature 551
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Christine Muschik, Markus Heyl, Esteban Martinez, Thomas Monz, Philipp Schindler, Berit Vogell, Marcello Dalmonte, Philipp Hauke, Rainer Blatt, and Peter Zoller, “U(1) wilson lattice gauge theories in digital quantum simulators,” New Journal of Physics 19
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
C. Wetterich, “Gauge symmetry from decoupling,” Nuclear Physics B 915
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Yoshihito Kuno, Shinya Sakane, Kenichi Kasamatsu, Ikuo Ichinose, and Tetsuo Matsui, “Quantum simulation of ( 1 + 1 1+1 )-dimensional u(1) gauge-higgs model on a lattice by cold bose gases,” Phys. Rev. D 95
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
A. S. Dehkharghani, E. Rico, N. T. Zinner, and A. Negretti, “Quantum simulation of abelian lattice gauge theories via state-dependent hopping,” Phys. Rev. A 96
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Omjyoti Dutta, Luca Tagliacozzo, Maciej Lewenstein, and Jakub Zakrzewski, “Toolbox for abelian lattice gauge theories with synthetic matter,” Phys. Rev. A 95
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Christopher T. Chubb and Steven T. Flammia, “Approximate symmetries of hamiltonians,” Journal of Mathematical Physics 58
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
2020
Later among the works it cites.
Mari Carmen Bañuls and Krzysztof Cichy, “Review on novel methods for lattice gauge theories,” Reports on Progress in Physics 83
2020
Later among the works it cites.
Umberto Borla, Ruben Verresen, Fabian Grusdt, and Sergej Moroz, “Confined phases of one-dimensional spinless fermions coupled to Z 2 {Z}_{2} gauge theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124
2020
Later among the works it cites.
Thomas Iadecola and Michael Schecter, “Quantum many-body scar states with emergent kinetic constraints and finite-entanglement revivals,” Phys. Rev. B 101
2020
Later among the works it cites.
Daniel K. Mark, Cheng-Ju Lin, and Olexei I. Motrunich, “Unified structure for exact towers of scar states in the Affleck-Kennedy-Lieb-Tasaki and other models,” Phys. Rev. B 101
2020
Later among the works it cites.
Dmitri E. Kharzeev and Yuta Kikuchi, “Real-time chiral dynamics from a digital quantum simulation,” Phys. Rev. Research 2
2020
Later among the works it cites.
Yuri Alexeev, Dave Bacon, Kenneth R. Brown, Robert Calderbank, Lincoln D. Carr, Frederic T. Chong, Brian DeMarco, Dirk Englund, Edward Farhi, Bill Fefferman, Alexey V. Gorshkov, Andrew Houck, Jungsang Kim, Shelby Kimmel, Michael Lange, Seth Lloyd, Mikhail D. Lukin, Dmitri Maslov, Peter Maunz, Christopher Monroe, John Preskill, Martin Roetteler, Martin J. Savage, and Jeff Thompson, “Quantum computer systems for scientific discovery,” PRX Quantum 2
2021
Later among the works it cites.
2021
Later among the works it cites.
Anthony Ciavarella, Natalie Klco, and Martin J. Savage, “Trailhead for quantum simulation of su(3) yang-mills lattice gauge theory in the local multiplet basis,” Phys. Rev. D 103
2021
Later among the works it cites.
Yasar Y. Atas, Jinglei Zhang, Randy Lewis, Amin Jahanpour, Jan F. Haase, and Christine A. Muschik, “Su(2) hadrons on a quantum computer via a variational approach,” Nature Communications 12
2021
Later among the works it cites.
Nhung H. Nguyen, Minh C. Tran, Yingyue Zhu, Alaina M. Green, C. Huerta Alderete, Zohreh Davoudi, and Norbert M. Linke, “Digital quantum simulation of the schwinger model and symmetry protection with trapped ions,” (2021), 10.48550/ARXIV.2112.14262
2021
Later among the works it cites.
2021
Later among the works it cites.
Zhan Wang, Zi-Yong Ge, Zhongcheng Xiang, Xiaohui Song, Rui-Zhen Huang, Pengtao Song, Xue-Yi Guo, Luhong Su, Kai Xu, Dongning Zheng, and Heng Fan, “Observation of emergent ℤ 2 \mathbb{Z}_{2} gauge invariance in a superconducting circuit,” (2021), 10.48550/ARXIV.2111.05048
2021
Later among the works it cites.
Carlos Barceló, Raúl Carballo-Rubio, Luis J. Garay, and Gerardo García-Moreno, “Emergent gauge symmetries: Yang-mills theory,” Phys. Rev. D 104
2021
Later among the works it cites.
Steven D. Bass, “Emergent gauge symmetries: making symmetry as well as breaking it,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 380
2021
Later among the works it cites.
Minh C. Tran, Yuan Su, Daniel Carney, and Jacob M. Taylor, “Faster digital quantum simulation by symmetry protection,” PRX Quantum 2
2021
Later among the works it cites.
Umberto Borla, Ruben Verresen, Jeet Shah, and Sergej Moroz, “Gauging the Kitaev chain,” SciPost Phys. 10
2021
Later among the works it cites.
2021
Later among the works it cites.
Matja ž Kebrič, Luca Barbiero, Christian Reinmoser, Ulrich Schollwöck, and Fabian Grusdt, “Confinement and mott transitions of dynamical charges in one-dimensional lattice gauge theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127
2021
Later among the works it cites.
Federica Maria Surace, Matteo Votto, Eduardo Gonzalez Lazo, Alessandro Silva, Marcello Dalmonte, and Giuliano Giudici, “Exact many-body scars and their stability in constrained quantum chains,” Phys. Rev. B 103
2021
Later among the works it cites.
D. Banerjee, S. Caspar, F. J. Jiang, J. H. Peng, and U. J. Wiese, “Nematic confined phases in the u ( 1 ) u(1) quantum link model on a triangular lattice: An opportunity for near-term quantum computations of string dynamics on a chip,” (2021), 10.48550/ARXIV.2107.01283
2021
Later among the works it cites.
Angus Kan, Lena Funcke, Stefan Kühn, Luca Dellantonio, Jinglei Zhang, Jan F. Haase, Christine A. Muschik, and Karl Jansen, “3+1d θ \theta -term on the lattice from the hamiltonian perspective,” (2021), 10.48550/ARXIV.2111.02238
2021
Later among the works it cites.
Thomas D. Cohen, Henry Lamm, Scott Lawrence, and Yukari Yamauchi (NuQS Collaboration), “Quantum algorithms for transport coefficients in gauge theories,” Phys. Rev. D 104
2021
Later among the works it cites.
Niklas Mueller, Torsten V. Zache, and Robert Ott, “Quantum thermalization of gauge theories: chaos, turbulence and universality,” (2021), 10.48550/ARXIV.2111.01155
2021
Later among the works it cites.
Proceedings of the 2021 Quantum Simulation for Strong Interactions (QuaSi) Workshops (2022), https://iqus.uw.edu/
2022
Closest in time.
Monika Aidelsburger, Luca Barbiero, Alejandro Bermudez, Titas Chanda, Alexandre Dauphin, Daniel González-Cuadra, Przemysław R. Grzybowski, Simon Hands, Fred Jendrzejewski, Johannes Jünemann, Gediminas Juzeliūnas, Valentin Kasper, Angelo Piga, Shi-Ju Ran, Matteo Rizzi, Germán Sierra, Luca Tagliacozzo, Emanuele Tirrito, Torsten V. Zache, Jakub Zakrzewski, Erez Zohar, and Maciej Lewenstein, “Cold atoms meet lattice gauge theory,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 380
2022
Closest in time.
2022
Closest in time.
Christian W. Bauer. Zohreh Davoudi, A. Baha Balantekin, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, Marcela Carena, Wibe A. de Jong, Patrick Draper, Aida El-Khadra, Nate Gemelke, Masanori Hanada, Dmitri Kharzeev, Henry Lamm, Ying-Ying Li, Junyu Liu, Mikhail Lukin, Yannick Meurice, Christopher Monroe, Benjamin Nachman, Guido Pagano, John Preskill, Enrico Rinaldi, Alessandro Roggero, David I. Santiago, Martin J. Savage, Irfan Siddiqi, George Siopsis, David Van Zanten, Nathan Wiebe, Yukari Yamauchi, Kübra Yeter-Aydeniz, and Silvia Zorzetti, “Quantum simulation for high energy physics,” (2022), 10.48550/ARXIV.2204.03381
2022
Closest in time.
Julius Mildenberger, Wojciech Mruczkiewicz, Jad C. Halimeh, Zhang Jiang, and Philipp Hauke, “Probing confinement in a ℤ 2 \mathbb{Z}_{2} lattice gauge theory on a quantum computer,” (2022), 10.48550/ARXIV.2203.08905
2022
Closest in time.
Jad C. Halimeh, Haifeng Lang, and Philipp Hauke, “Gauge protection in non-abelian lattice gauge theories,” New Journal of Physics (2022)
2022
Closest in time.
2022
Closest in time.
2022
Closest in time.
Jean-Yves Desaules, Ana Hudomal, Debasish Banerjee, Arnab Sen, Zlatko Papić, and Jad C. Halimeh, “Prominent quantum many-body scars in a truncated schwinger model,” (2022), 10.48550/ARXIV.2204.01745
2022
Closest in time.
Adith Sai Aramthottil, Utso Bhattacharya, Daniel González-Cuadra, Maciej Lewenstein, Luca Barbiero, and Jakub Zakrzewski, “Scar states in deconfined ℤ 2 \mathbb{Z}_{2} lattice gauge theories,” (2022), 10.48550/ARXIV.2201.10260
2022
Closest in time.
2022
Closest in time.
Jad C. Halimeh, Ian P. McCulloch, Bing Yang, and Philipp Hauke, “Tuning the topological θ \theta -angle in cold-atom quantum simulators of gauge theories,” (2022), 10.48550/ARXIV.2204.06570
2022
Closest in time.
Yanting Cheng, Shang Liu, Wei Zheng, Pengfei Zhang, and Hui Zhai, “Tunable confinement-deconfinement transition in an ultracold atom quantum simulator,” (2022), 10.48550/ARXIV.2204.06586
2022
Closest in time.