Built on

A. Barreira, The squeezed matter bispectrum covariance with responses
Original
1901
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Chudaykin and M. M. Ivanov, Measuring neutrino masses with large-scale structure: Euclid forecast with controlled theoretical error
Original
1907
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Oddo, E. Sefusatti, C. Porciani, P. Monaco, and A. G. Sánchez, Toward a robust inference method for the galaxy bispectrum: likelihood function and model selection
Original
1908
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. d’Amico, J. Gleyzes, N. Kokron, K. Markovic, L. Senatore, P. Zhang, F. Beutler, and H. Gil-Marín, The cosmological analysis of the SDSS/BOSS data from the Effective Field Theory of Large-Scale Structure
Original
1909
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Hahn, F. Villaescusa-Navarro, E. Castorina, and R. Scoccimarro, Constraining M ν
Original
1909
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Gualdi, H. Gil-Marín, M. Manera, B. Joachimi, and O. Lahav, GEOMAX: beyond linear compression for three-point galaxy clustering statistics
Original
1912
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Gil-Marín, L. Verde, J. Noreña, A. J. Cuesta, L. Samushia, W. J. Percival, C. Wagner, M. Manera, and D. P. Schneider, The power spectrum and bispectrum of SDSS DR11 BOSS galaxies - II. Cosmological interpretation
Original
1921
Earlier work this paper cites.
Wiley New York, 1958
T. W. Anderson, An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis · 1958
Earlier work this paper cites.
Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press, 1980. 435 p., 1980
P. J. E. Peebles, The large-scale structure of the universe · 1980
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. N. Fry and E. Gaztañaga, Biasing and hierarchical statistics in large-scale structure
1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Hivon, F. R. Bouchet, S. Colombi, and R. Juszkiewicz, Redshift distortions of clustering: a Lagrangian approach
1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Matarrese, L. Verde, and A. F. Heavens, Large-scale bias in the universe: bispectrum method
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Verde, A. F. Heavens, S. Matarrese, and L. Moscardini, Large-scale bias in the universe - ii. redshift-space bispectrum
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Scoccimarro, H. M. P. Couchman, and J. A. Frieman, The bispectrum as a signature of gravitational instability in redshift space
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Scoccimarro, The bispectrum: From theory to observations
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Bernardeau, S. Colombi, E. Gaztañaga, and R. Scoccimarro, Large-scale structure of the universe and cosmological perturbation theory
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Monaco, T. Theuns, and G. Taffoni, The pinocchio algorithm: pinpointing orbit-crossing collapsed hierarchical objects in a linear density field
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Gualdi and L. Verde, Galaxy redshift-space bispectrum: the importance of being anisotropic
Original
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Nishimichi, G. D’Amico, M. M. Ivanov, L. Senatore, M. Simonović, M. Takada, M. Zaldarriaga, and P. Zhang, Blinded challenge for precision cosmology with large-scale structure: Results from effective field theory for the redshift-space galaxy power spectrum
Original
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Eggemeier, R. Scoccimarro, M. Crocce, A. Pezzotta, and A. G. Sánchez, Testing one-loop galaxy bias: Power spectrum
Original
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Agarwal, V. Desjacques, D. Jeong, and F. Schmidt, Information content in the redshift-space galaxy power spectrum and bispectrum
Original
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Hartlap, T. Schrabback, P. Simon, and P. Schneider, The non-Gaussianity of the cosmic shear likelihood or how odd is the Chandra Deep Field South?
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Taruya, T. Nishimichi, and S. Saito, Baryon acoustic oscillations in 2D: Modeling redshift-space power spectrum from perturbation theory
Original
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

R. Laureijs, J. Amiaux, S. Arduini, J. . Auguères, J. Brinchmann, R. Cole, M. Cropper, C. Dabin, L. Duvet, A. Ealet, and et al., Euclid Definition Study Report
Original
2011
Cited alongside, same era.
C. Hahn and F. Villaescusa-Navarro, Constraining M ν
Original
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
K. C. Chan, R. Scoccimarro, and R. K. Sheth, Gravity and large-scale nonlocal bias
Original
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
T. Baldauf, U. Seljak, V. Desjacques, and P. McDonald, Evidence for quadratic tidal tensor bias from the halo bispectrum
Original
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Levi, C. Bebek, T. Beers, R. Blum, R. Cahn, D. Eisenstein, B. Flaugher, K. Honscheid, R. Kron, O. Lahav, P. McDonald, N. Roe, D. Schlegel, and representing the DESI collaboration, The DESI Experiment, a whitepaper for Snowmass 2013

Then

D. Ginzburg, V. Desjacques, and K. C. Chan, Shot noise and biased tracers: A new look at the halo model
Original
2017
Later among the works it cites.
E. Munari, P. Monaco, E. Sefusatti, E. Castorina, F. G. Mohammad, S. Anselmi, and S. Borgani, Improving fast generation of halo catalogues with higher order Lagrangian perturbation theory
Original
2017
Later among the works it cites.
D. W. Pearson and L. Samushia, A Detection of the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation features in the SDSS BOSS DR12 Galaxy Bispectrum
Original
2018
Later among the works it cites.
V. Yankelevich and C. Porciani, Cosmological information in the redshift-space bispectrum
Original
2018
Later among the works it cites.
V. Desjacques, D. Jeong, and F. Schmidt, The galaxy power spectrum and bispectrum in redshift space

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Reading the bibliography…

2022

The Halo Bispectrum Multipoles in Redshift Space

Rizzo, Federico, Moretti, Chiara, Pardede, Kevin et al.

Understand

We present the analysis of the halo bispectrum in redshift-space in terms of its multipoles, monopole, quadrupole and hexadecapole, measured from a large set of simulations.

We fit such measurements with a tree-level model in perturbation theory that depends on linear and nonlinear bias parameters as well as on the growth rate $f$ of density fluctuations.
The likelihood analysis takes advantage of a very large set of mock catalogs, enabling a robust estimation of the covariance properties for all multipoles.
We compare the numerical estimate of the covariance matrix to its Gaussian prediction finding discrepancies of 10% or less for all configurations with the sole exception of the squeezed triangles in the monopole case.