Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
A well motivated method for demonstrating that an experiment resists any classical explanation is to show that its statistics violate generalized noncontextuality.
1909
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. S. Motzkin, H. Raiffa, G. L. Thompson, and R. M. Thrall, “The double description method,” Contributions to the Theory of Games 2
1953
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. S. Bell, “On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox,” Physics 1
1964
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Kochen and E. Specker, “The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics,” J. Math. & Mech. 17
1967
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. McMullen, “The maximum numbers of faces of a convex polytope,” Mathematika 17
1970
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Avis and K. Fukuda, “A pivoting algorithm for convex hulls and vertex enumeration of arrangements and polyhedra,” in Proceedings of the seventh annual symposium on Computational geometry (1991) pp. 98–104
1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Hardy, “Quantum theory from five reasonable axioms,” arXiv preprint quant-ph/0101012 (2001)
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Hardy, “Quantum Theory From Five Reasonable Axioms,” arXiv:quant-ph/0101012 (2001)
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Kimura, “The bloch vector for n-level systems,” Physics Letters A 314
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. W. Spekkens, “Contextuality for preparations, transformations, and unsharp measurements,” Phys. Rev. A 71
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Barrett, N. Linden, S. Massar, S. Pironio, S. Popescu, and D. Roberts, “Nonlocal correlations as an information-theoretic resource,” Physical Review A 71
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Barrett, “Information processing in generalized probabilistic theories,” Phys. Rev. A 75
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. W. Spekkens, “Evidence for the epistemic view of quantum states: A toy theory,” Phys. Rev. A 75
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. W. Spekkens, “Negativity and Contextuality are Equivalent Notions of Nonclassicality,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. W. Spekkens, D. H. Buzacott, A. J. Keehn, B. Toner, and G. J. Pryde, “Preparation Contextuality Powers Parity-Oblivious Multiplexing,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Chiribella, G. M. D’Ariano, and P. Perinotti, “Probabilistic theories with purification,” Phys. Rev. A 81
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Hardy, “Reformulating and reconstructing quantum theory,” arXiv:1104.2066 (2011)
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. D. Bartlett, T. Rudolph, and R. W. Spekkens, “Reconstruction of Gaussian quantum mechanics from Liouville mechanics with an epistemic restriction,” Phys. Rev. A 86
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
M. F. Pusey, “Anomalous Weak Values Are Proofs of Contextuality,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Kunjwal and R. W. Spekkens, “From the Kochen-Specker Theorem to Noncontextuality Inequalities without Assuming Determinism,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
G. Chiribella, G. M. D’Ariano, and P. Perinotti, “Quantum from Principles,” in Fundamental Theories of Physics (Springer Netherlands, 2015) pp. 171–221
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Chailloux, I. Kerenidis, S. Kundu, and J. Sikora, “Optimal bounds for parity-oblivious random access codes,” New J. Phys. 18
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Lostaglio, “Certifying Quantum Signatures in Thermodynamics and Metrology via Contextuality of Quantum Linear Response,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125
2020
Later among the works it cites.
F. Shahandeh, “Contextuality of general probabilistic theories,” PRX Quantum 2
2021
Later among the works it cites.
R. D. Baldijão, R. Wagner, C. Duarte, B. Amaral, and M. T. Cunha, “Emergence of Noncontextuality under Quantum Darwinism,” PRX Quantum 2
2021
Later among the works it cites.
J. Shin, D. Ha, and Y. Kwon, “Quantum contextual advantage depending on nonzero prior probabilities in state discrimination of mixed qubit states,” Entropy 23
2021
Later among the works it cites.
A. Chaturvedi, M. Farkas, and V. J. Wright, “Characterising and bounding the set of quantum behaviours in contextuality scenarios,” Quantum 5
2021
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
M. D. Mazurek, M. F. Pusey, R. Kunjwal, K. J. Resch, and R. W. Spekkens, “An experimental test of noncontextuality without unphysical idealizations,” Nature communications 7
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
R. W. Spekkens, “Quasi-Quantization: Classical Statistical Theories with an Epistemic Restriction,” in Quantum Theory: Informational Foundations and Foils , edited by G. Chiribella and R. W. Spekkens (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2016) pp. 83–135
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
B. Coecke, T. Fritz, and R. W. Spekkens, “A mathematical theory of resources,” Info. Comp. 250
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Krishna, R. W. Spekkens, and E. Wolfe, “Deriving robust noncontextuality inequalities from algebraic proofs of the kochen–specker theorem: the peres–mermin square,” New Journal of Physics 19
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
F. Shahandeh, M. J. W. Hall, and T. C. Ralph, “Measurement-Device-Independent Approach to Entanglement Measures,” Physical Review Letters 118
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Kunjwal and R. W. Spekkens, “From statistical proofs of the kochen-specker theorem to noise-robust noncontextuality inequalities,” Phys. Rev. A 97
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
D. Schmid and R. W. Spekkens, “Contextual advantage for state discrimination,” Phys. Rev. X 8
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
M. D. Mazurek, M. F. Pusey, K. J. Resch, and R. W. Spekkens, “Experimentally bounding deviations from quantum theory in the landscape of generalized probabilistic theories,” PRX Quantum 2
2021
Later among the works it cites.
M. Müller, “Probabilistic theories and reconstructions of quantum theory,” SciPost Physics Lecture Notes , 028 (2021)
2021
Later among the works it cites.
S. A. Yadavalli and R. Kunjwal, “Contextuality in entanglement-assisted one-shot classical communication,” (2022)
2022
Closest in time.
D. Schmid, H. Du, J. H. Selby, and M. F. Pusey, “Uniqueness of noncontextual models for stabilizer subtheories,” (2022)
2022
Closest in time.
K. Flatt, H. Lee, C. R. I. Carceller, J. B. Brask, and J. Bae, “Contextual advantages and certification for maximum-confidence discrimination,” PRX Quantum 3
2022
Closest in time.
S. Mukherjee, S. Naonit, and A. K. Pan, “Discriminating three mirror-symmetric states with a restricted contextual advantage,” Phys. Rev. A 106
2022
Closest in time.
V. Gitton and M. P. Woods, “Solvable criterion for the contextuality of any prepare-and-measure scenario,” Quantum 6
2022
Closest in time.
https://github.com/eliewolfe/SimplexEmbedding (2022), open-source Mathematica code for implementing the linear program introduced in this manuscript
2022
Closest in time.
M. J. Grabowecky, C. A. J. Pollack, A. R. Cameron, R. W. Spekkens, and K. J. Resch, “Experimentally bounding deviations from quantum theory for a photonic three-level system using theory-agnostic tomography,” Phys. Rev. A 105
2022
Closest in time.
M. P. Müller and A. J. P. Garner, “Testing quantum theory by generalizing noncontextuality,” Phys. Rev. X 13
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
L. Catani, M. Leifer, D. Schmid, and R. W. Spekkens, “Why interference phenomena do not capture the essence of quantum theory,” Quantum 7
2023
Closest in time.
M. Plávala, “General probabilistic theories: An introduction,” (2023), general probabilistic theories: An introduction
2023
Closest in time.
T. Gonda and R. W. Spekkens, “Monotones in General Resource Theories,” (2023)
2023
Closest in time.
V. P. Rossi, D. Schmid, J. H. Selby, and A. B. Sainz, “Contextuality with vanishing coherence and maximal robustness to dephasing,” Phys. Rev. A 108
2023
Closest in time.