Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
As machine learning models are increasingly being employed to make consequential decisions in real-world settings, it becomes critical to ensure that individuals who are adversely impacted (e.g., loan denied) by the predictions of these models are provided with a means for recourse.
Knowledge acquisition from examples via multiple models
Pedro Domingos · 1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
Random forests
Leo Breiman · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine
Jerome H Friedman · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Model compression
Cristian Bucilua, Rich Caruana, and Alexandru Niculescu-Mizil · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
”give me some credit data set”, 2011
Kaggle-Competition · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python
Fabian Pedregosa, Gaël Varoquaux, Alexandre Gramfort, Vincent Michel, Bertrand Thirion, Olivier Grisel, Mathieu Blondel, Peter Prettenhofer, Ron Weiss, Vincent Dubourg, et al · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Distilling the knowledge in a neural network
Geoffrey Hinton, Oriol Vinyals, and Jeff Dean · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Machine bias: There’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. and it’s biased against blacks, 2016
Julia Angwin, Jeff Larson, Surya Mattu, and Lauren Kirchner · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
” why should i trust you?” explaining the predictions of any classifier
Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
UCI machine learning repository, 2017
Dheeru Dua and Casey Graff · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Inverse classification for comparison-based interpretability in machine learning
Thibault Laugel, Marie-Jeanne Lesot, Christophe Marsala, Xavier Renard, and Marcin Detyniecki · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Interpretable predictions of tree-based ensembles via actionable feature tweaking
Gabriele Tolomei, Fabrizio Silvestri, Andrew Haines, and Mounia Lalmas · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
The eu general data protection regulation (gdpr)
Paul Voigt and Axel Von dem Bussche · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Robustness may be at odds with accuracy
Dimitris Tsipras, Shibani Santurkar, Logan Engstrom, Alexander Turner, and Aleksander Madry · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Counterfactual explanations without opening the black box: automated decisions and the gdpr
Sandra Wachter, Brent Mittelstadt, and Chris Russell · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Preserving causal constraints in counterfactual explanations for machine learning classifiers
Divyat Mahajan, Chenhao Tan, and Amit Sharma · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library
Adam Paszke, Sam Gross, Francisco Massa, Adam Lerer, James Bradbury, Gregory Chanan, Trevor Killeen, Zeming Lin, Natalia Gimelshein, Luca Antiga, et al · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Towards understanding knowledge distillation
Mary Phuong and Christoph Lampert · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Adversarial training can hurt generalization
Aditi Raghunathan, Sang Michael Xie, Fanny Yang, John C Duchi, and Percy Liang · 2019
Getting a clue: A method for explaining uncertainty estimates
Javier Antorán, Umang Bhatt, Tameem Adel, Adrian Weller, and José Miguel Hernández-Lobato · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Evaluating robustness of counterfactual explanations
André Artelt, Valerie Vaquet, Riza Velioglu, Fabian Hinder, Johannes Brinkrolf, Malte Schilling, and Barbara Hammer · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Consistent counterfactuals for deep models
Emily Black, Zifan Wang, Matt Fredrikson, and Anupam Datta · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Deep neural networks and tabular data: A survey
Vadim Borisov, Tobias Leemann, Kathrin Seßler, Johannes Haug, Martin Pawelczyk, and Gjergji Kasneci · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Carla: A python library to benchmark algorithmic recourse and counterfactual explanation algorithms
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
Actionable recourse in linear classification
Berk Ustun, Alexander Spangher, and Y. Liu · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Interpretable counterfactual explanations guided by prototypes
Arnaud Van Looveren and Janis Klaise · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Manipulation-proof machine learning
Daniel Björkegren, Joshua E. Blumenstock, and Samsun Knight · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Multi-objective counterfactual explanations
Susanne Dandl, Christoph Molnar, Martin Binder, and Bernd Bischl · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Explaining machine learning classifiers through diverse counterfactual explanations
Ramaravind K. Mothilal, Amit Sharma, and Chenhao Tan · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Learning model-agnostic counterfactual explanations for tabular data
Martin Pawelczyk, Klaus Broelemann, and Gjergji Kasneci · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Interpretable and interactive summaries ofactionable recourses
Kaivalya Rawal and Himabindu Lakkaraju · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Martin Pawelczyk, Sascha Bielawski, Johan Van den Heuvel, Tobias Richter, and Gjergji Kasneci · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Algorithmic recourse in the wild: Understanding the impact of data and model shifts
Kaivalya Rawal, Ece Kamar, and Himabindu Lakkaraju · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Counterfactual explanations can be manipulated
Dylan Slack, Sophie Hilgard, Himabindu Lakkaraju, and Sameer Singh · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Counterfactual explanations for arbitrary regression models
Thomas Spooner, Danial Dervovic, Jason Long, Jon Shepard, Jiahao Chen, and Daniele Magazzeni · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Towards robust and reliable algorithmic recourse
Sohini Upadhyay, Shalmali Joshi, and Himabindu Lakkaraju · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
On the adversarial robustness of causal algorithmic recourse
Ricardo Dominguez-Olmedo, Amir-Hossein Karimi, and Bernhard Schölkopf · 2022
Closest in time.
Focus: Flexible optimizable counterfactual explanations for tree ensembles
Ana Lucic, Harrie Oosterhuis, Hinda Haned, and Maarten de Rijke · 2022
Closest in time.
Exploring counterfactual explanations through the lens ofadversarial examples: A theoretical and empirical analysis
Martin Pawelczyk, Chirag Agarwal, Shalmali Joshi, Sohini Upadhyay, and Himabindu Lakkaraju · 2022
Closest in time.
On the Trade-Off between Actionable Explanations and the Right to be Forgotten
Martin Pawelczyk, Tobias Leemann, Asia Biega, and Gjergji Kasneci · 2023
Closest in time.