Fetching the paper…

Reading the bibliography…

2022

Applications of Machine Learning to Lattice Quantum Field Theory

Boyda, Denis, Calì, Salvatore, Foreman, Sam et al.

Original
PDF
Post on X

Understand

There is great potential to apply machine learning in the area of numerical lattice quantum field theory, but full exploitation of that potential will require new strategies.

In this white paper for the Snowmass community planning process, we discuss the unique requirements of machine learning for lattice quantum field theory research and outline what is needed to enable exploration and deployment of this approach in the future.

Applications of Machine Learning to Lattice Quantum Field Theory · Around

Built on

Michelle J. Dolinski, Alan W. P. Poon, and Werner Rodejohann, “Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay: Status and Prospects,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69
Original
1902
Earlier work this paper cites.
Constantia Alexandrou, Andreas Athenodorou, Charalambos Chrysostomou, and Srijit Paul, “The critical temperature of the 2D-Ising model through Deep Learning Autoencoders,” Eur. Phys. J. B 93
Original
1903
Earlier work this paper cites.
Richard C. Brower, Anna Hasenfratz, Ethan T. Neil, Simon Catterall, George Fleming, Joel Giedt, Enrico Rinaldi, David Schaich, Evan Weinberg, and Oliver Witzel (USQCD), “Lattice Gauge Theory for Physics Beyond the Standard Model,” Eur. Phys. J. A 55
Original
1904
Earlier work this paper cites.
Christoph Lehner et al. (USQCD), “Opportunities for Lattice QCD in Quark and Lepton Flavor Physics,” Eur. Phys. J. A 55
Original
1904
Earlier work this paper cites.
Andreas S. Kronfeld, David G. Richards, William Detmold, Rajan Gupta, Huey-Wen Lin, Keh-Fei Liu, Aaron S. Meyer, Raza Sufian, and Sergey Syritsyn (USQCD), “Lattice QCD and Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering,” Eur. Phys. J. A 55
Original
1904
Earlier work this paper cites.
Vincenzo Cirigliano, Zohreh Davoudi, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, Taku Izubuchi, Phiala E. Shanahan, Sergey Syritsyn, and Michael L. Wagman (USQCD), “The Role of Lattice QCD in Searches for Violations of Fundamental Symmetries and Signals for New Physics,” Eur. Phys. J. A 55
Original
1904
Earlier work this paper cites.
William Detmold, Robert G. Edwards, Jozef J. Dudek, Michael Engelhardt, Huey-Wen Lin, Stefan Meinel, Kostas Orginos, and Phiala Shanahan (USQCD), “Hadrons and Nuclei,” Eur. Phys. J. A 55
Original
1904
Earlier work this paper cites.
Alexei Bazavov, Frithjof Karsch, Swagato Mukherjee, and Peter Petreczky (USQCD), “Hot-dense Lattice QCD: USQCD whitepaper 2018,” Eur. Phys. J. A 55
Original
1904
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bálint Joó, Chulwoo Jung, Norman H. Christ, William Detmold, Robert Edwards, Martin Savage, and Phiala Shanahan (USQCD), “Status and Future Perspectives for Lattice Gauge Theory Calculations to the Exascale and Beyond,” Eur. Phys. J. A 55
Original
1904
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. S. Albergo, G. Kanwar, and P. E. Shanahan, “Flow-based generative models for Markov chain Monte Carlo in lattice field theory,” Phys. Rev. D 100
Original
1904
Earlier work this paper cites.
Dalya Baron, “Machine learning in astronomy: a practical overview,” (2019), arXiv:1904.07248 [astro-ph.IM]
Original
1904
Earlier work this paper cites.
Lukas Kades, Jan M. Pawlowski, Alexander Rothkopf, Manuel Scherzer, Julian M. Urban, Sebastian J. Wetzel, Nicolas Wink, and Felix P. G. Ziegler, “Spectral Reconstruction with Deep Neural Networks,” Phys. Rev. D 102
Original
1905
Earlier work this paper cites.
Takuya Matsumoto, Masakiyo Kitazawa, and Yasuhiro Kohno, “Classifying topological charge in SU(3) Yang–Mills theory with machine learning,” PTEP 2021
Original
1909
Earlier work this paper cites.
Rui Zhang, Zhouyou Fan, Ruizi Li, Huey-Wen Lin, and Boram Yoon, “Machine-learning prediction for quasiparton distribution function matrix elements,” Phys. Rev. D 101
Original
1909
Earlier work this paper cites.
Kim A. Nicoli, Shinichi Nakajima, Nils Strodthoff, Wojciech Samek, Klaus-Robert Müller, and Pan Kessel, “Asymptotically unbiased estimation of physical observables with neural samplers,” Phys. Rev. E 101
Original
1910
Earlier work this paper cites.
Sam Offler, Gert Aarts, Chris Allton, Jonas Glesaaen, Benjamin Jäger, Seyong Kim, Maria Paola Lombardo, Sinead M. Ryan, and Jon-Ivar Skullerud, “News from bottomonium spectral functions in thermal QCD,” PoS LATTICE2019
Original
1912
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Duane, A. D. Kennedy, B. J. Pendleton, and D. Roweth, “Hybrid Monte Carlo,” Phys. Lett. B 195
1987
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Asakawa, T. Hatsuda, and Y. Nakahara, “Maximum entropy analysis of the spectral functions in lattice QCD,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 46
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Gert Aarts and Jose Maria Martínez Resco, “Transport coefficients, spectral functions and the lattice,” JHEP 04
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Greensite, “The Confinement problem in lattice gauge theory,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 51
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Gurtej Kanwar, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, Sébastien Racanière, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, “Equivariant flow-based sampling for lattice gauge theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125
Original
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Stefan Blücher, Lukas Kades, Jan M. Pawlowski, Nils Strodthoff, and Julian M. Urban, “Towards novel insights in lattice field theory with explainable machine learning,” Phys. Rev. D 101
Original
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Georges Ripka, Dual superconductor models of color confinement , Vol. 639 (2004) arXiv:hep-ph/0310102
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Dimitrios Bachtis, Gert Aarts, and Biagio Lucini, “Extending machine learning classification capabilities with histogram reweighting,” Phys. Rev. E 102
Original
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. Drach, “Composite electroweak sectors on the lattice,” PoS LATTICE2019
Original
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Elena Cuoco et al. , “Enhancing Gravitational-Wave Science with Machine Learning,” Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 2
Original
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Edwin A. Bedolla-Montiel, Luis Carlos Padierna, and Ramón Castañeda Priego, “Machine Learning for Condensed Matter Physics,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter 33
Original
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Jan-Lukas Wynen, Evan Berkowitz, Stefan Krieg, Thomas Luu, and Johann Ostmeyer, “Machine learning to alleviate Hubbard-model sign problems,” Phys. Rev. B 103
Original
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Hon Man Yau and Nan Su, “On the generalizability of artificial neural networks in spin models,” (2020), arXiv:2006.15021 [cond-mat.dis-nn]
Original
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Shen Li, Yanli Zhao, Rohan Varma, Omkar Salpekar, Pieter Noordhuis, Teng Li, Adam Paszke, Jeff Smith, Brian Vaughan, Pritam Damania, and Soumith Chintala, “Pytorch distributed: Experiences on accelerating data parallel training,” (2020), arXiv:2006.15704 [cs.DC]
Original
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Kim A. Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Lena Funcke, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Pan Kessel, Shinichi Nakajima, and Paolo Stornati, “Estimation of Thermodynamic Observables in Lattice Field Theories with Deep Generative Models,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126
Original
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, Sébastien Racanière, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Michael S. Albergo, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, “Sampling using S U ( N ) SU(N) gauge equivariant flows,” Phys. Rev. D 103
Original
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Philippe de Forcrand, “Simulating QCD at finite density,” PoS LAT2009
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. L. Boyda, M. N. Chernodub, N. V. Gerasimeniuk, V. A. Goy, S. D. Liubimov, and A. V. Molochkov, “Finding the deconfinement temperature in lattice Yang-Mills theories from outside the scaling window with machine learning,” Phys. Rev. D 103
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Martin Luscher, “Trivializing maps, the Wilson flow and the HMC algorithm,” Commun. Math. Phys. 293
Original
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Dimitrios Bachtis, Gert Aarts, and Biagio Lucini, “Adding machine learning within Hamiltonians: Renormalization group transformations, symmetry breaking and restoration,” Phys. Rev. Res. 3
Original
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. A. Clark, R. Babich, K. Barros, R. C. Brower, and C. Rebbi, “Solving Lattice QCD systems of equations using mixed precision solvers on GPUs,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 181
Original
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Harvey B. Meyer, “Transport Properties of the Quark-Gluon Plasma: A Lattice QCD Perspective,” Eur. Phys. J. A 47
Original
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Zohreh Davoudi and Martin J. Savage, “Restoration of Rotational Symmetry in the Continuum Limit of Lattice Field Theories,” Phys. Rev. D 86
Original
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

Pilar Hernández and Fernando Romero-López, “The large N c N_{c} limit of QCD on the lattice,” Eur. Phys. J. A 57
Original
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, “Lattice Gauge Equivariant Convolutional Neural Networks,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128
Original
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
Xiangdong Ji, “Parton Physics on a Euclidean Lattice,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110
Original
2013
Cited alongside, same era.
Biagio Lucini and Marco Panero, “SU(N) gauge theories at large N,” Phys. Rept. 526
Original
2013
Cited alongside, same era.
Peter Boyle, Azusa Yamaguchi, Guido Cossu, and Antonin Portelli, “Grid: A next generation data parallel C++ QCD library,” (2015), arXiv:1512.03487 [hep-lat]

Then

Steven L. Brunton, Bernd R. Noack, and Petros Koumoutsakos, “Machine learning for fluid mechanics,” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 52
2020
Later among the works it cites.
Kristof T Schütt, Stefan Chmiela, O Anatole von Lilienfeld, Alexandre Tkatchenko, Koji Tsuda, and Klaus-Robert Müller, “Machine learning meets quantum physics,” Lecture Notes in Physics (2020)
2020
Later among the works it cites.
Y. Aoki et al. , “FLAG Review 2021,” (2021), arXiv:2111.09849 [hep-lat]
Original
2021
Later among the works it cites.
B. Abi et al. (Muon g-2), “Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.46 ppm,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126
Original
2021
Later among the works it cites.
A. X. El-Khadra, “Review of muon g-2,” (2021), The 38th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

2015

Cited alongside, same era.

Martín Abadi, Ashish Agarwal, Paul Barham, Eugene Brevdo, Zhifeng Chen, Craig Citro, Greg S. Corrado, Andy Davis, Jeffrey Dean, Matthieu Devin, Sanjay Ghemawat, Ian Goodfellow, Andrew Harp, Geoffrey Irving, Michael Isard, Yangqing Jia, Rafal Jozefowicz, Lukasz Kaiser, Manjunath Kudlur, Josh Levenberg, Dandelion Mané, Rajat Monga, Sherry Moore, Derek Murray, Chris Olah, Mike Schuster, Jonathon Shlens, Benoit Steiner, Ilya Sutskever, Kunal Talwar, Paul Tucker, Vincent Vanhoucke, Vijay Vasudevan, Fernanda Viégas, Oriol Vinyals, Pete Warden, Martin Wattenberg, Martin Wicke, Yuan Yu, and Xiaoqiang Zheng, “TensorFlow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems,” (2015), software available from tensorflow.org

2015

Cited alongside, same era.

Gert Aarts, “Introductory lectures on lattice QCD at nonzero baryon number,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 706

2016

Cited alongside, same era.

Thomas DeGrand, “Lattice tests of beyond standard model dynamics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 88

2016

Cited alongside, same era.

Manu Mathur and T. P. Sreeraj, “Lattice Gauge Theories and Spin Models,” Phys. Rev. D 94

2016

Cited alongside, same era.

Mark D Wilkinson, Michel Dumontier, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, Gabrielle Appleton, Myles Axton, Arie Baak, Niklas Blomberg, Jan-Willem Boiten, Luiz Bonino da Silva Santos, Philip E Bourne, et al. , “The fair guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship,” Scientific data 3

2016

Cited alongside, same era.

Michael L. Wagman and Martin J. Savage, “Statistics of baryon correlation functions in lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 96

2017

Cited alongside, same era.

Jonathan Engel and Javier Menéndez, “Status and Future of Nuclear Matrix Elements for Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay: A Review,” Rept. Prog. Phys. 80

Original

2017

Cited alongside, same era.

2021

Later among the works it cites.

Michael S. Albergo, Gurtej Kanwar, Sébastien Racanière, Danilo J. Rezende, Julian M. Urban, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, “Flow-based sampling for fermionic lattice field theories,” (2021), arXiv:2106.05934 [hep-lat]

2021

Later among the works it cites.

Daniel C. Hackett, Chung-Chun Hsieh, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Jiunn-Wei Chen, Kai-Feng Chen, Kyle Cranmer, Gurtej Kanwar, and Phiala E. Shanahan, “Flow-based sampling for multimodal distributions in lattice field theory,” (2021), arXiv:2107.00734 [hep-lat]

2021

Later among the works it cites.

Marylou Gabrié, Grant M. Rotskoff, and Eric Vanden-Eijnden, “Adaptive Monte Carlo augmented with normalizing flows,” (2021), arXiv:2105.12603 [physics.data-an]

2021

Later among the works it cites.

Luigi Del Debbio, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Michael Wilson, “Efficient Modelling of Trivializing Maps for Lattice ϕ 4 \phi^{4} Theory Using Normalizing Flows: A First Look at Scalability,” (2021), arXiv:2105.12481 [hep-lat]

2021

Later among the works it cites.

Dian Wu, Riccardo Rossi, and Giuseppe Carleo, “Unbiased Monte Carlo Cluster Updates with Autoregressive Neural Networks,” (2021), arXiv:2105.05650 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

2021

Later among the works it cites.

Sam Foreman, Xiao-Yong Jin, and James C. Osborn, “Deep Learning Hamiltonian Monte Carlo,” in 9th International Conference on Learning Representations (2021) arXiv:2105.03418 [hep-lat]

2021

Later among the works it cites.

Sam Foreman, Taku Izubuchi, Luchang Jin, Xiao-Yong Jin, James C. Osborn, and Akio Tomiya, “HMC with Normalizing Flows,” in 38th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (2021) arXiv:2112.01586 [cs.LG]

2021

Later among the works it cites.

Sam Foreman, Xiao-Yong Jin, and James C. Osborn, “LeapfrogLayers: A Trainable Framework for Effective Topological Sampling,” in 38th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (2021) arXiv:2112.01582 [hep-lat]

2021

Later among the works it cites.

Pim de Haan, Corrado Rainone, Miranda C. N. Cheng, and Roberto Bondesan, “Scaling Up Machine Learning For Quantum Field Theory with Equivariant Continuous Flows,” (2021), arXiv:2110.02673 [cs.LG]

2021

Later among the works it cites.

Akio Tomiya and Yuki Nagai, “Gauge covariant neural network for 4 dimensional non-abelian gauge theory,” (2021), arXiv:2103.11965 [hep-lat]

Original

2021

Later among the works it cites.

Scott Lawrence and Yukari Yamauchi, “Normalizing Flows and the Real-Time Sign Problem,” Phys. Rev. D 103

2021

Later among the works it cites.

Srinath Bulusu, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, “Generalization capabilities of translationally equivariant neural networks,” Phys. Rev. D 104

2021

Later among the works it cites.

Andrea Palermo, Lucio Anderlini, Maria Paola Lombardo, Andrey Kotov, and Anton Trunin, “Machine learning approaches to the QCD transition,” in 38th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (2021) arXiv:2111.05216 [hep-lat]

2021

Later among the works it cites.

D. R Tan, J. H Peng, Y. H Tseng, and F. J Jiang, “A universal neural network for learning phases,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136

Original

2021

Later among the works it cites.

William Detmold, Gurtej Kanwar, Henry Lamm, Michael L. Wagman, and Neill C. Warrington, “Path integral contour deformations for observables in S U ( N ) SU(N) gauge theory,” Phys. Rev. D 103

2021

Later among the works it cites.

R. J. Hudspith and D. Mohler, “A fully non-perturbative charm-quark tuning using machine learning,” (2021), arXiv:2112.01997 [hep-lat]

2021

Later among the works it cites.

Jan Horak, Jan M. Pawlowski, José Rodríguez-Quintero, Jonas Turnwald, Julian M. Urban, Nicolas Wink, and Savvas Zafeiropoulos, “Reconstructing QCD Spectral Functions with Gaussian Processes,” (2021), arXiv:2107.13464 [hep-ph]

2021

Later among the works it cites.

S. Y. Chen, H. T. Ding, F. Y. Liu, G. Papp, and C. B. Yang, “Machine learning spectral functions in lattice QCD,” (2021), arXiv:2110.13521 [hep-lat]

Original

2021

Later among the works it cites.

Lingxiao Wang, Shuzhe Shi, and Kai Zhou, “Automatic differentiation approach for reconstructing spectral functions with neural networks,” in 35th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (2021) arXiv:2112.06206 [physics.comp-ph]

2021

Later among the works it cites.

Jiqun Tu, M. A. Clark, Chulwoo Jung, and Robert Mawhinney, “Solving DWF Dirac Equation Using Multi-splitting Preconditioned Conjugate Gradient with Tensor Cores on NVIDIA GPUs,” (2021), 10.1145/3468267.3470613 , arXiv:2104.05615 [hep-lat]

2021

Later among the works it cites.

Matthew Feickert and Benjamin Nachman, “A Living Review of Machine Learning for Particle Physics,” (2021), arXiv:2102.02770 [hep-ph]

2021

Later among the works it cites.

Amber Boehnlein et al. , “Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Nuclear Physics,” (2021), arXiv:2112.02309 [nucl-th]

Original

2021

Later among the works it cites.

Akinori Tanaka, Akio Tomiya, and Kōji Hashimoto, Deep Learning and Physics (Springer, 2021)

2021

Later among the works it cites.

Dmitrii Kochkov, Jamie A. Smith, Ayya Alieva, Qing Wang, Michael P. Brenner, and Stephan Hoyer, “Machine learning–accelerated computational fluid dynamics,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118

2021

Later among the works it cites.

Aaron S. Meyer, André Walker-Loud, and Callum Wilkinson, “Status of Lattice QCD Determination of Nucleon Form Factors and their Relevance for the Few-GeV Neutrino Program,” (2022), arXiv:2201.01839 [hep-lat]

2022

Closest in time.

Xiao-Yong Jin, “Neural Network Field Transformation and Its Application in HMC,” in 38th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (2022) arXiv:2201.01862 [hep-lat]

Original

2022

Closest in time.

Jacob Finkenrath, “Tackling critical slowing down using global correction steps with equivariant flows: the case of the Schwinger model,” (2022), arXiv:2201.02216 [hep-lat]

2022

Closest in time.

Shuzhe Shi, Lingxiao Wang, and Kai Zhou, “Rethinking the ill-posedness of the spectral function reconstruction - why is it fundamentally hard and how Artificial Neural Networks can help,” (2022), arXiv:2201.02564 [hep-ph]

2022

Closest in time.

“Symmetry Group Equivariant Architectures for Physics,” in Snowmass 2022 , in preparation

2022

Closest in time.

M. Lüscher et al. , “openQCD,” https://luscher.web.cern.ch/luscher/openQCD/ (2022)

2022

Closest in time.

R. Edwards et al. (USQCD), “SciDAC,” https://usqcd-software.github.io/ (2022)

2022

Closest in time.

“Uncertainty Quantification in Machine Learning,” in Snowmass 2022 , in preparation

2022

Closest in time.

“Data Science & Machine Learning Education in HEP,” in Snowmass 2022 , in preparation

2022

Closest in time.