Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
There have been growing interests in leveraging experimental measurements to discover the underlying partial differential equations (PDEs) that govern complex physical phenomena.
Neural algorithm for solving differential equations
Hyuk Lee and In Seok Kang · 1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
Discovering dynamics: from inductive logic programming to machine discovery
Saso Dzeroski and Ljupco Todorovski · 1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Robert Tibshirani · 1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
Artificial neural networks for solving ordinary and partial differential equations
Isaac E Lagaris, Aristidis Likas, and Dimitrios I Fotiadis · 1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
Signal reconstruction from noisy random projections
Jarvis Haupt and Robert Nowak · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Automated reverse engineering of nonlinear dynamical systems
Josh Bongard and Hod Lipson · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Iterative hard thresholding for compressed sensing
Thomas Blumensath and Mike E Davies · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Distilling free-form natural laws from experimental data
Michael Schmidt and Hod Lipson · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fourier neural operator for parametric partial differential equations
Zongyi Li, Nikola Kovachki, Kamyar Azizzadenesheli, Burigede Liu, Kaushik Bhattacharya, Andrew Stuart, and Anima Anandkumar · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Min Lin, Qiang Chen, and Shuicheng Yan · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems
Steven L Brunton, Joshua L Proctor, and J Nathan Kutz · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks
Thomas N Kipf and Max Welling · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a survey
Atılım Günes Baydin, Barak A Pearlmutter, Alexey Andreyevich Radul, and Jeffrey Mark Siskind · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Geometric deep learning: going beyond euclidean data
Michael M Bronstein, Joan Bruna, Yann LeCun, Arthur Szlam, and Pierre Vandergheynst · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Data-driven discovery of partial differential equations
Samuel H Rudy, Steven L Brunton, Joshua L Proctor, and J Nathan Kutz · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
The deep ritz method: a deep learning-based numerical algorithm for solving variational problems
Bing Yu et al · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networks
Peter W Battaglia, Jessica B Hamrick, Victor Bapst, Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Vinicius Zambaldi, Mateusz Malinowski, Andrea Tacchetti, David Raposo, Adam Santoro, Ryan Faulkner, et al · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Denoising and spatial resolution enhancement of 4d flow mri using proper orthogonal decomposition and lasso regularization
Mojtaba F Fathi, Ali Bakhshinejad, Ahmadreza Baghaie, David Saloner, Raphael H Sacho, Vitaliy L Rayz, and Roshan M D’Souza · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Solving high-dimensional partial differential equations using deep learning
Jiequn Han, Arnulf Jentzen, and E Weinan · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Learning particle dynamics for manipulating rigid bodies, deformable objects, and fluids
Yunzhu Li, Jiajun Wu, Russ Tedrake, Joshua B Tenenbaum, and Antonio Torralba · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Pde-net: Learning pdes from data
Zichao Long, Yiping Lu, Xianzhong Ma, and Bin Dong · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Deep hidden physics models: Deep learning of nonlinear partial differential equations
Maziar Raissi · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Meshfreeflownet: a physics-constrained deep continuous space-time super-resolution framework
Soheil Esmaeilzadeh, Kamyar Azizzadenesheli, Karthik Kashinath, Mustafa Mustafa, Hamdi A Tchelepi, Philip Marcus, Mr Prabhat, Anima Anandkumar, et al · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Modeling the dynamics of pde systems with physics-constrained deep auto-regressive networks
Nicholas Geneva and Nicholas Zabaras · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Disentangling physical dynamics from unknown factors for unsupervised video prediction
Vincent Le Guen and Nicolas Thome · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Integration of neural network-based symbolic regression in deep learning for scientific discovery
Samuel Kim, Peter Y Lu, Srijon Mukherjee, Michael Gilbert, Li Jing, Vladimir Čeperić, and Marin Soljačić · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Deep learning methods for super-resolution reconstruction of turbulent flows
Bo Liu, Jiupeng Tang, Haibo Huang, and Xi-Yun Lu · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Learning equations for extrapolation and control
Subham Sahoo, Christoph Lampert, and Georg Martius · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Bayesian deep convolutional encoder–decoder networks for surrogate modeling and uncertainty quantification
Yinhao Zhu and Nicholas Zabaras · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Learning data-driven discretizations for partial differential equations
Yohai Bar-Sinai, Stephan Hoyer, Jason Hickey, and Michael P Brenner · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Robust flow reconstruction from limited measurements via sparse representation
Jared L Callaham, Kazuki Maeda, and Steven L Brunton · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Pde-net 2.0: Learning pdes from data with a numeric-symbolic hybrid deep network
Zichao Long, Yiping Lu, and Bin Dong · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations
Maziar Raissi, Paris Perdikaris, and George E Karniadakis · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Lagrangian fluid simulation with continuous convolutions
Benjamin Ummenhofer, Lukas Prantl, Nils Thuerey, and Vladlen Koltun · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Adversarial super-resolution of climatological wind and solar data
Karen Stengel, Andrew Glaws, Dylan Hettinger, and Ryan N King · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Towards physics-informed deep learning for turbulent flow prediction
Rui Wang, Karthik Kashinath, Mustafa Mustafa, Adrian Albert, and Rose Yu · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Physics-informed learning of governing equations from scarce data
Zhao Chen, Yang Liu, and Hao Sun · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Machine-learning-based spatio-temporal super resolution reconstruction of turbulent flows
Kai Fukami, Koji Fukagata, and Kunihiko Taira · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Physics-informed machine learning
George Em Karniadakis, Ioannis G Kevrekidis, Lu Lu, Paris Perdikaris, Sifan Wang, and Liu Yang · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Machine learning–accelerated computational fluid dynamics
Dmitrii Kochkov, Jamie A Smith, Ayya Alieva, Qing Wang, Michael P Brenner, and Stephan Hoyer · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Learning nonlinear operators via deeponet based on the universal approximation theorem of operators
Lu Lu, Pengzhan Jin, Guofei Pang, Zhongqiang Zhang, and George Em Karniadakis · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
A physics-informed operator regression framework for extracting data-driven continuum models
Ravi G Patel, Nathaniel A Trask, Mitchell A Wood, and Eric C Cyr · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Phycrnet: Physics-informed convolutional-recurrent network for solving spatiotemporal pdes
Pu Ren, Chengping Rao, Yang Liu, Jianxun Wang, and Hao Sun · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Physics-informed spline learning for nonlinear dynamics discovery
Fangzheng Sun, Yang Liu, and Hao Sun · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Deep-learning of parametric partial differential equations from sparse and noisy data
Hao Xu, Dongxiao Zhang, and Junsheng Zeng · 2021
Later among the works it cites.