Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Since the average treatment effect (ATE) measures the change in social welfare, even if positive, there is a risk of negative effect on, say, some 10% of the population.
Inequalities
Godfrey Harold Hardy, John Edensor Littlewood, George Pólya, and György Pólya. 1952 · 1952
Earlier work this paper cites.
Optimal global rates of convergence for nonparametric regression
Charles J Stone. 1982 · 1982
Earlier work this paper cites.
Testing for qualitative interactions between treatment effects and patient subsets
M Gail and Richard Simon. 1985 · 1985
Earlier work this paper cites.
Comment: Which ifs have causal answers
Donald B Rubin. 1986 · 1986
Earlier work this paper cites.
On Asymptotically Efficient Estimation in Semiparametric Models
Anton Schick. 1986 · 1986
Earlier work this paper cites.
Nonparametric tests of interaction in experimental design
Shlomo S Sawilowsky. 1990 · 1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
Treatment effect heterogeneity in paired data
AC Davison. 1992 · 1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
Estimation of regression-coefficients when some regressors are not always observed
James M Robins, Andrea Rotnitzky, and Lue Ping Zhao. 1994 · 1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
Making the most out of programme evaluations and social experiments: Accounting for heterogeneity in programme impacts
James J Heckman, Jeffrey Smith, and Nancy Clements. 1997 · 1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
Coherent measures of risk
Philippe Artzner, Freddy Delbaen, Jean-Marc Eber, and David Heath. 1999 · 1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
Optimization of conditional value-at-risk
R Tyrrell Rockafellar and Stanislav Uryasev. 2000 · 2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
A distribution-free theory of nonparametric regression
László Györfi, Michael Kohler, Adam Krzyżak, and Harro Walk. 2002 · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Portfolio optimization with conditional value-at-risk objective and constraints
Pavlo Krokhmal, Jonas Palmquist, and Stanislav Uryasev. 2002 · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Robust supervised learning. In AAAI
J Andrew Bagnell. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Optimization of convex risk functions
Andrzej Ruszczyński and Alexander Shapiro. 2006 · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
A Distributional Approach for Causal Inference Using Propensity Scores
Zhiqiang Tan. 2006 · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Efficient semiparametric estimation of quantile treatment effects
Sergio Firpo. 2007 · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Nonparametric tests for treatment effect heterogeneity
Richard K Crump, V Joseph Hotz, Guido W Imbens, and Oscar A Mitnik. 2008 · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation
Guido W Imbens and Jeffrey M Wooldridge. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Quantile and probability curves without crossing
Victor Chernozhukov, Iván Fernández-Val, and Alfred Galichon. 2010 · 2010
Cited alongside, same era.
Performance guarantees for individualized treatment rules
Min Qian and Susan A Murphy. 2011 · 2011
Cited alongside, same era.
Cross-validated targeted minimum-loss-based estimation
Wenjing Zheng and Mark J van der Laan. 2011 · 2011
Cited alongside, same era.
Entropic value-at-risk: A new coherent risk measure
Amir Ahmadi-Javid. 2012 · 2012
Cited alongside, same era.
Estimating individualized treatment rules using outcome weighted learning
Yingqi Zhao, Donglin Zeng, A John Rush, and Michael R Kosorok. 2012 · 2012
Cited alongside, same era.
Robust solutions of optimization problems affected by uncertain probabilities
Aharon Ben-Tal, Dick Den Hertog, Anja De Waegenaere, Bertrand Melenberg, and Gijs Rennen. 2013 · 2013
Residual unfairness in fair machine learning from prejudiced data. In ICML
Nathan Kallus and Angela Zhou. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Preventing fairness gerrymandering: Auditing and learning for subgroup fairness. In ICML
Michael Kearns, Seth Neel, Aaron Roth, and Zhiwei Steven Wu. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Who should be treated? empirical welfare maximization methods for treatment choice
Toru Kitagawa and Aleksey Tetenov. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Estimation and inference of heterogeneous treatment effects using random forests
Stefan Wager and Susan Athey. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Fairness under unawareness: Assessing disparity when protected class is unobserved. In FAccT
Jiahao Chen, Nathan Kallus, Xiaojie Mao, Geoffry Svacha, and Madeleine Udell. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
Estimating treatment effect heterogeneity in randomized program evaluation
Kosuke Imai and Marc Ratkovic. 2013 · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
Private and public provision of counseling to job seekers: Evidence from a large controlled experiment
Luc Behaghel, Bruno Crépon, and Marc Gurgand. 2014 · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Causal inference in statistics, social, and biomedical sciences
Guido W Imbens and Donald B Rubin. 2015 · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects
Susan Athey and Guido Imbens. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Randomization inference for treatment effect variation
Peng Ding, Avi Feller, and Luke Miratrix. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
“Why should i trust you?” Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In KDD
Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Peng Ding, Avi Feller, and Luke Miratrix. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Localized debiased machine learning: Efficient inference on quantile treatment effects and beyond
Nathan Kallus, Xiaojie Mao, and Masatoshi Uehara. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Assessing disparate impacts of personalized interventions: Identifiability and bounds
Nathan Kallus and Angela Zhou. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Metalearners for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects using machine learning
Sören R Künzel, Jasjeet S Sekhon, Peter J Bickel, and Bin Yu. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Faithful and customizable explanations of black box models. In AIES
Himabindu Lakkaraju, Ece Kamar, Rich Caruana, and Jure Leskovec. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Bayesian sensitivity analysis for offline policy evaluation. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society . 64–70
Jongbin Jung, Ravi Shroff, Avi Feller, and Sharad Goel. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Optimal doubly robust estimation of heterogeneous causal effects
Edward H Kennedy. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
The sensitivity of counterfactual fairness to unmeasured confounding. In UAI
Niki Kilbertus, Philip J Ball, Matt J Kusner, Adrian Weller, and Ricardo Silva. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learning. In NeurIPS
Preethi Lahoti, Alex Beutel, Jilin Chen, Kang Lee, Flavien Prost, Nithum Thain, Xuezhi Wang, and Ed Chi. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Doubly-Valid/Doubly-Sharp Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Inference with Unmeasured Confounding
Jacob Dorn, Kevin Guo, and Nathan Kallus. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Assessing algorithmic fairness with unobserved protected class using data combination
Nathan Kallus, Xiaojie Mao, and Angela Zhou. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Minimax-optimal policy learning under unobserved confounding
Nathan Kallus and Angela Zhou. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Quasi-oracle estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects
Xinkun Nie and Stefan Wager. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Experimental design in two-sided platforms: An analysis of bias
Ramesh Johari, Hannah Li, Inessa Liskovich, and Gabriel Y Weintraub. 2022 · 2022
Closest in time.