Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Tracking the dynamics of physical systems in real time is a prime application of digital quantum computers.
J. Schwinger, On Gauge Invariance and Vacuum Polarization, Phys. Rev. 82
1951
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Schwinger, The Theory of Quantized Fields. II, Phys. Rev. 91
1953
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Schwinger, Gauge Invariance and Mass. II, Phys. Rev. 128
1962
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Kogut and L. Susskind, Hamiltonian formulation of Wilson’s lattice gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 11
1975
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. P. Feynman, Simulating Physics with Computers, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21
1982
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Suzuki, General theory of fractal path integrals with applications to many-body theories and statistical physics, J. Math. Phys. 32
1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Lloyd, Universal Quantum Simulators, Science 273
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. J. Hamer, Z. Weihong, and J. Oitmaa, Series expansions for the massive Schwinger model in Hamiltonian lattice theory, Phys. Rev. D 56
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Sorensen and K. Molmer, Quantum computation with ions in thermal motion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Solano, R. L. de Matos Filho, and N. Zagury, Deterministic Bell states and measurement of the motional state of two trapped ions, Phys. Rev. A 59
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. J. Milburn, S. Schneider, and D. F. V. James, Ion Trap Quantum Computing with Warm Ions, 3.0.CO;2-1" title="" class="ltx_ref ltx_href">Fortschritte der Physik 48
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Kielpinski, C. Monroe, and D. J. Wineland, Architecture for a large-scale ion-trap quantum computer, Nature 417
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Olmschenk, K. C. Younge, D. L. Moehring, D. N. Matsukevich, P. Maunz, and C. Monroe, Manipulation and detection of a trapped Yb + hyperfine qubit, Phys. Rev. A 76
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. A. Calzetta and B.-L. B. Hu, Nonequilibrium Quantum Field Theory , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2008)
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. R. Beane, W. Detmold, K. Orginos, and M. J. Savage, Nuclear Physics from Lattice QCD, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 66
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Monz, P. Schindler, J. T. Barreiro, M. Chwalla, D. Nigg, W. A. Coish, M. Harlander, W. Hänsel, M. Hennrich, and R. Blatt, 14-Qubit Entanglement: Creation and Coherence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. M. Childs and N. Wiebe, Hamiltonian simulation using linear combinations of unitary operations, Quantum Inf. Comput. 12
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. P. Jordan, K. S. Lee, and J. Preskill, Quantum algorithms for quantum field theories, Science 336
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Banerjee, M. Dalmonte, M. Müller, E. Rico, P. Stebler, U.-J. Wiese, and P. Zoller, Atomic Quantum Simulation of Dynamical Gauge Fields coupled to Fermionic Matter: From String Breaking to Evolution after a Quench, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Stannigel, P. Hauke, D. Marcos, M. Hafezi, S. Diehl, M. Dalmonte, and P. Zoller, Constrained dynamics via the Zeno effect in quantum simulation: Implementing non-Abelian lattice gauge theories with cold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Choi, S. Debnath, T. A. Manning, C. Figgatt, Z.-X. Gong, L.-M. Duan, and C. Monroe, Optimal Quantum Control of Multimode Couplings between Trapped Ion Qubits for Scalable Entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. W. Berry, A. M. Childs, R. Cleve, R. Kothari, and R. D. Somma, Simulating Hamiltonian dynamics with a truncated Taylor series, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
H.-T. Ding, F. Karsch, and S. Mukherjee, Thermodynamics of strong-interaction matter from Lattice QCD, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 24
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Zohar, J. I. Cirac, and B. Reznik, Quantum simulations of lattice gauge theories using ultracold atoms in optical lattices, Rep. Prog. Phys. 79
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. J. Wallman and J. Emerson, Noise tailoring for scalable quantum computation via randomized compiling, Phys. Rev. A 94
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Yang, G. S. Giri, M. Johanning, C. Wunderlich, P. Zoller, and P. Hauke, Analog quantum simulation of ( 1 + 1 ) (1+1) -dimensional lattice QED with trapped ions, Phys. Rev. A 94
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. A. Martinez, C. A. Muschik, P. Schindler, D. Nigg, A. Erhard, M. Heyl, P. Hauke, M. Dalmonte, T. Monz, P. Zoller, and R. Blatt, Real-time dynamics of lattice gauge theories with a few-qubit quantum computer, Nature 534
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Debnath, N. M. Linke, C. Figgatt, K. A. Landsman, K. Wright, and C. Monroe, Demonstration of a small programmable quantum computer with atomic qubits, Nature 536
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. H. Low and I. L. Chuang, Optimal hamiltonian simulation by quantum signal processing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Temme, S. Bravyi, and J. M. Gambetta, Error mitigation for short-depth quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Muschik, M. Heyl, E. Martinez, T. Monz, P. Schindler, B. Vogell, M. Dalmonte, P. Hauke, R. Blatt, and P. Zoller, U(1) Wilson lattice gauge theories in digital quantum simulators, New J. Phys. 19
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Omran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Nature 551
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Endo, S. C. Benjamin, and Y. Li, Practical quantum error mitigation for near-future applications, Phys. Rev. X 8
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. A. Briceno, J. J. Dudek, and R. D. Young, Scattering processes and resonances from lattice QCD, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
C. Ratti, Lattice QCD and heavy ion collisions: a review of recent progress, Rept. Prog. Phys. 81
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
N. Klco, E. F. Dumitrescu, A. J. McCaskey, T. D. Morris, R. C. Pooser, M. Sanz, E. Solano, P. Lougovski, and M. J. Savage, Quantum-classical computation of schwinger model dynamics using quantum computers, Phys. Rev. A 98
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
G. H. Low and I. L. Chuang, Hamiltonian simulation by qubitization, Quantum 3
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Chakraborty, A. Gilyén, and S. Jeffery, The Power of Block-Encoded Matrix Powers: Improved Regression Techniques via Faster Hamiltonian Simulation, in 46th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2019) , Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Vol. 132, edited by C. Baier, I. Chatzigiannakis, P. Flocchini, and S. Leonardi (Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Dagstuhl, Germany, 2019) pp. 33:1–33:14
W. J. Huggins, J. R. McClean, N. C. Rubin, Z. Jiang, N. Wiebe, K. B. Whaley, and R. Babbush, Efficient and noise resilient measurements for quantum chemistry on near-term quantum computers, npj Quantum Inf. 7
2021
Closest in time.
J. Barata, N. Mueller, A. Tarasov, and R. Venugopalan, Single-particle digitization strategy for quantum computation of a ϕ 4 \phi^{4} scalar field theory, Phys. Rev. A 103
2021
Closest in time.
A. Ciavarella, N. Klco, and M. J. Savage, Trailhead for quantum simulation of SU(3) Yang-Mills lattice gauge theory in the local multiplet basis, Phys. Rev. D 103
2021
Closest in time.
2021
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Gilyén, Y. Su, G. H. Low, and N. Wiebe, Quantum singular value transformation and beyond: exponential improvements for quantum matrix arithmetics, in Proceedings of the 51st Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing (2019) pp. 193–204
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
A. M. Childs and Y. Su, Nearly Optimal Lattice Simulation by Product Formulas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
N. Klco and M. J. Savage, Digitization of scalar fields for quantum computing, Phys. Rev. A 99
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
H. Lamm, S. Lawrence, and Y. Yamauchi (NuQS), General Methods for Digital Quantum Simulation of Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. D 100
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
J. R. Stryker, Oracles for Gauss’s law on digital quantum computers, Phys. Rev. A 99
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Kandala, K. Temme, A. D. Córcoles, A. Mezzacapo, J. M. Chow, and J. M. Gambetta, Error mitigation extends the computational reach of a noisy quantum processor, Nature 567
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
S. S. Tannu and M. K. Qureshi, Mitigating measurement errors in quantum computers by exploiting state-dependent bias, in Proceedings of the 52nd Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture , MICRO ’52 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2019) p. 279–290
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
D. Paulson, L. Dellantonio, J. F. Haase, A. Celi, A. Kan, A. Jena, C. Kokail, R. van Bijnen, K. Jansen, P. Zoller, and C. A. Muschik, Simulating 2d effects in lattice gauge theories on a quantum computer, PRX Quantum 2
2021
Closest in time.
B. Nachman, D. Provasoli, W. A. de Jong, and C. W. Bauer, Quantum algorithm for high energy physics simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126
2021
Closest in time.
M. C. Tran, Y. Su, D. Carney, and J. M. Taylor, Faster digital quantum simulation by symmetry protection, PRX Quantum 2
2021
Closest in time.
A. Shaw, Classical-Quantum Noise Mitigation for NISQ Hardware, arXiv:2105.08701 (2021)
2021
Closest in time.
P. Czarnik, A. Arrasmith, P. J. Coles, and L. Cincio, Error mitigation with clifford quantum-circuit data, Quantum 5
2021
Closest in time.
J. Vovrosh, K. E. Khosla, S. Greenaway, C. Self, M. S. Kim, and J. Knolle, Simple mitigation of global depolarizing errors in quantum simulations, Phys. Rev. E 104
2021
Closest in time.
Y. Aoki et al. , FLAG Review 2021, arXiv:2111.09849 (2021)
2021
Closest in time.
2021
Closest in time.
J. R. Stryker, Shearing approach to gauge invariant trotterization, arXiv:2105.11548 (2021)
2021
Closest in time.
2021
Closest in time.
2021
Closest in time.
2021
Closest in time.
2021
Closest in time.
2021
Closest in time.
L. Egan, D. M. Debroy, C. Noel, A. Risinger, D. Zhu, D. Biswas, M. Newman, M. Li, K. R. Brown, M. Cetina, and C. Monroe, Fault-tolerant control of an error-corrected qubit, Nature 598
2021
Closest in time.
2021
Closest in time.
Y. Su, H.-Y. Huang, and E. T. Campbell, Nearly tight trotterization of interacting electrons, Quantum 5
2021
Closest in time.
D. An, D. Fang, and L. Lin, Time-dependent unbounded hamiltonian simulation with vector norm scaling, Quantum 5
2021
Closest in time.
2021
Closest in time.
2021
Closest in time.
B. Şahinoğlu and R. D. Somma, Hamiltonian simulation in the low-energy subspace, npj Quantum Inf. 7
2021
Closest in time.
2021
Closest in time.
Y. Y. Atas, J. Zhang, R. Lewis, A. Jahanpour, J. F. Haase, and C. A. Muschik, Su(2) hadrons on a quantum computer via a variational approach, Nat. Comm. 12
2021
Closest in time.
S. A Rahman, R. Lewis, E. Mendicelli, and S. Powell, Su(2) lattice gauge theory on a quantum annealer, Phys. Rev. D 104
2021
Closest in time.
J. F. Haase, L. Dellantonio, A. Celi, D. Paulson, A. Kan, K. Jansen, and C. A. Muschik, A resource efficient approach for quantum and classical simulations of gauge theories in particle physics, Quantum 5
2021
Closest in time.
2021
Closest in time.
2021
Closest in time.