Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Machine learning algorithms based on parametrized quantum circuits are prime candidates for near-term applications on noisy quantum computers.
M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Programmable Quantum Gate Arrays, Physical Review Letters 79
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Kearns, Efficient noise-tolerant learning from statistical queries, Journal of the ACM (JACM) 45
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Schölkopf, A. J. Smola, F. Bach, et al. , Learning with kernels: support vector machines, regularization, optimization, and beyond (MIT press, 2002)
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. A. Nielsen and I. Chuang, Quantum computation and quantum information (American Association of Physics Teachers, 2002)
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Brassard, P. Hoyer, M. Mosca, and A. Tapp, Quantum amplitude amplification and estimation, Contemporary Mathematics 305
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. J. Briegel, D. E. Browne, W. Dür, R. Raussendorf, and M. Van den Nest, Measurement-based quantum computation, Nature Physics 5
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, et al. , Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python, the Journal of machine Learning research 12
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Peruzzo, J. McClean, P. Shadbolt, M.-H. Yung, X.-Q. Zhou, P. J. Love, A. Aspuru-Guzik, and J. L. O’brien, A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor, Nature communications 5
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, Adam: A method for stochastic optimization, arXiv:1412.6980 (2014)
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Bravyi and D. Gosset, Improved classical simulation of quantum circuits dominated by clifford gates, Physical review letters 116
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Carrasquilla and R. G. Melko, Machine learning phases of matter, Nature Physics 13
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Biamonte, P. Wittek, N. Pancotti, P. Rebentrost, N. Wiebe, and S. Lloyd, Quantum machine learning, Nature 549
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Shalev-Shwartz, O. Shamir, and S. Shammah, Failures of gradient-based deep learning, in International Conference on Machine Learning (PMLR, 2017) pp. 3067–3075
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Preskill, Quantum computing in the nisq era and beyond, Quantum 2
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. Dunjko and H. J. Briegel, Machine learning & artificial intelligence in the quantum domain: a review of recent progress, Reports on Progress in Physics 81
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
J.-G. Liu and L. Wang, Differentiable learning of quantum circuit born machines, Physical Review A 98
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
J. R. McClean, S. Boixo, V. N. Smelyanskiy, R. Babbush, and H. Neven, Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes, Nature communications 9
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Benedetti, E. Lloyd, S. Sack, and M. Fiorentini, Parameterized quantum circuits as machine learning models, Quantum Science and Technology 4
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
D. Zhu, N. M. Linke, M. Benedetti, K. A. Landsman, N. H. Nguyen, C. H. Alderete, A. Perdomo-Ortiz, N. Korda, A. Garfoot, C. Brecque, et al. , Training of quantum circuits on a hybrid quantum computer, Science advances 5
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
V. Havlíček, A. D. Córcoles, K. Temme, A. W. Harrow, A. Kandala, J. M. Chow, and J. M. Gambetta, Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces, Nature 567
Y. Liu, S. Arunachalam, and K. Temme, A rigorous and robust quantum speed-up in supervised machine learning, Nature Physics , 1 (2021)
2021
Closest in time.
R. Sweke, J.-P. Seifert, D. Hangleiter, and J. Eisert, On the quantum versus classical learnability of discrete distributions, Quantum 5
2021
Closest in time.
M. Schuld, Supervised quantum machine learning models are kernel methods, arXiv:2101.11020 (2021)
2021
Closest in time.
J. M. Kübler, S. Buchholz, and B. Schölkopf, The inductive bias of quantum kernels, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34
2021
Closest in time.
E. Peters, J. Caldeira, A. Ho, S. Leichenauer, M. Mohseni, H. Neven, P. Spentzouris, D. Strain, and G. N. Perdue, Machine learning of high dimensional data on a noisy quantum processor, npj Quantum Information 7
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Schuld and N. Killoran, Quantum machine learning in feature hilbert spaces, Physical review letters 122
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Schuld, A. Bocharov, K. M. Svore, and N. Wiebe, Circuit-centric quantum classifiers, Physical Review A 101
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Du, M.-H. Hsieh, T. Liu, and D. Tao, Expressive power of parametrized quantum circuits, Physical Review Research 2
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
K. Bartkiewicz, C. Gneiting, A. Černoch, K. Jiráková, K. Lemr, and F. Nori, Experimental kernel-based quantum machine learning in finite feature space, Scientific Reports 10
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Pérez-Salinas, A. Cervera-Lierta, E. Gil-Fuster, and J. I. Latorre, Data re-uploading for a universal quantum classifier, Quantum 4
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Daniely and E. Malach, Learning parities with neural networks, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
2021
Closest in time.
T. Kusumoto, K. Mitarai, K. Fujii, M. Kitagawa, and M. Negoro, Experimental quantum kernel trick with nuclear spins in a solid, npj Quantum Information 7
2021
Closest in time.
M. Schuld, R. Sweke, and J. J. Meyer, Effect of data encoding on the expressive power of variational quantum-machine-learning models, Physical Review A 103
2021
Closest in time.
A. Pérez-Salinas, D. López-Núñez, A. García-Sáez, P. Forn-Díaz, and J. I. Latorre, One qubit as a universal approximant, Physical Review A 104
2021
Closest in time.
T. Goto, Q. H. Tran, and K. Nakajima, Universal approximation property of quantum machine learning models in quantum-enhanced feature spaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127
2021
Closest in time.
D. Hsu, Dimension lower bounds for linear approaches to function approximation, Daniel Hsu’s homepage (2021)
2021
Closest in time.
D. Hsu, C. H. Sanford, R. Servedio, and E. V. Vlatakis-Gkaragkounis, On the approximation power of two-layer networks of random relus, in Proceedings of Thirty Fourth Conference on Learning Theory , Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 134, edited by M. Belkin and S. Kpotufe (PMLR, 2021) pp. 2423–2461
2021
Closest in time.
K. Bharti, A. Cervera-Lierta, T. H. Kyaw, T. Haug, S. Alperin-Lea, A. Anand, M. Degroote, H. Heimonen, J. S. Kottmann, T. Menke, et al. , Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms, Reviews of Modern Physics 94
2022
Closest in time.
A. Skolik, S. Jerbi, and V. Dunjko, Quantum agents in the gym: a variational quantum algorithm for deep q-learning, Quantum 6
2022
Closest in time.
2022
Closest in time.
T. Haug, C. N. Self, and M. Kim, Quantum machine learning of large datasets using randomized measurements, Machine Learning: Science and Technology 4
2023
Closest in time.
C. Gyurik, V. Dunjko, et al. , Structural risk minimization for quantum linear classifiers, Quantum 7
2023
Closest in time.
S. Jerbi, sjerbi/qml-beyond-kernel: Publication release (2023)
2023
Closest in time.