Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
High-quality, large-scale datasets have played a crucial role in the development and success of classical machine learning.
A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, “Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?” Physical Review 47
1935
Earlier work this paper cites.
DF Andrews and AM Herzberg, “Iris data,” in Data (Springer, 1985) pp. 5–8
1985
Earlier work this paper cites.
David E. Rumelhart, Geoffrey E. Hinton, and Ronald J. Williams, “Learning representations by back-propagating errors,” Nature 1986 323:6088 323
1986
Earlier work this paper cites.
Hava T Siegelmann and Eduardo D Sontag, “On the computational power of neural nets,” Journal of computer and system sciences 50
1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
Yann LeCun, “The mnist database of handwritten digits,” http://yann. lecun. com/exdb/mnist/ (1998)
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
Artur Ekert and Peter L. Knight, “Entangled quantum systems and the Schmidt decomposition,” American Journal of Physics 63
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
Wolfgang Dür, Guifre Vidal, and J Ignacio Cirac, “Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways,” Physical Review A 62
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
William K Wootters, “Entanglement of formation and concurrence.” Quantum Inf. Comput. 1
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Jens Eisert and Hans J. Briegel, “Schmidt measure as a tool for quantifying multiparticle entanglement,” Physical Review A 64
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Farrokh Vatan and Colin Williams, “Optimal quantum circuits for general two-qubit gates,” Physical Review A 69
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Thomas Hofmann, Bernhard Schölkopf, and Alexander J Smola, “Kernel methods in machine learning,” The annals of statistics 36
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Eric Chitambar, Runyao Duan, and Yaoyun Shi, “Tripartite entanglement transformations and tensor rank,” Physical review letters 101
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ryszard Horodecki, Paweł Horodecki, Michał Horodecki, and Karol Horodecki, “Quantum entanglement,” Reviews of modern physics 81
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Dafa Li, Xiangrong Li, Hongtao Huang, and Xinxin Li, “Slocc classification for nine families of four-qubits,” Quantum Info. Comput. 9
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Tamara G. Kolda and Brett W. Bader, “Tensor Decompositions and Applications,” SIAM review 51
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
J Robert Johansson and D Paul, “Qutip 2: A python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems,” Computer Physics Communications 183
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Patrick J. Coles, “Unification of different views of decoherence and discord,” Physical Review A 85
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Marcio F. Cornelio, “Multipartite monogamy of the concurrence,” Physical Review A 87
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Michael Siomau, “A quantum model for autonomous learning automata,” Quantum information processing 13
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Alberto Peruzzo, Jarrod McClean, Peter Shadbolt, Man-Hong Yung, Xiao-Qi Zhou, Peter J Love, Alán Aspuru-Guzik, and Jeremy L O’brien, “A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor,” Nature communications 5
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Maria Schuld, Ilya Sinayskiy, and Francesco Petruccione, “An introduction to quantum machine learning,” Contemporary Physics 56
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Szilárd Szalay, “Multipartite entanglement measures,” Physical Review A 92
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Alexander Wissner-Gross, “Datasets over algorithms,” (2016)
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Michael Walter, David Gross, and Jens Eisert, “Multipartite entanglement,” Quantum Information: From Foundations to Quantum Technology Applications , 293–330 (2016)
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Fernando GSL Brandao, Aram W Harrow, and Michał Horodecki, “Local random quantum circuits are approximate polynomial-designs,” Communications in Mathematical Physics 346
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Jacob Biamonte, Peter Wittek, Nicola Pancotti, Patrick Rebentrost, Nathan Wiebe, and Seth Lloyd, “Quantum machine learning,” Nature 549
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Jonathan Romero, Jonathan P Olson, and Alan Aspuru-Guzik, “Quantum autoencoders for efficient compression of quantum data,” Quantum Science and Technology 2
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Hannes Bernien, Sylvain Schwartz, Alexander Keesling, Harry Levine, Ahmed Omran, Hannes Pichler, Soonwon Choi, Alexander S Zibrov, Manuel Endres, Markus Greiner, et al. , “Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator,” Nature 551
Kerstin Beer, Dmytro Bondarenko, Terry Farrelly, Tobias J. Osborne, Robert Salzmann, Daniel Scheiermann, and Ramona Wolf, “Training deep quantum neural networks,” Nature Communications 11
2020
Later among the works it cites.
2020
Later among the works it cites.
Ryan LaRose and Brian Coyle, “Robust data encodings for quantum classifiers,” Physical Review A 102
2020
Later among the works it cites.
AV Uvarov, AS Kardashin, and Jacob D Biamonte, “Machine learning phase transitions with a quantum processor,” Physical Review A 102
2020
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Abhinav Kandala, Antonio Mezzacapo, Kristan Temme, Maika Takita, Markus Brink, Jerry M. Chow, and Jay M. Gambetta, “Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets,” Nature 549
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Mehryar Mohri, Afshin Rostamizadeh, and Ameet Talwalkar, Foundations of Machine Learning (MIT Press, 2018)
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
John Preskill, “Quantum computing in the nisq era and beyond,” Quantum 2
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Jarrod R McClean, Sergio Boixo, Vadim N Smelyanskiy, Ryan Babbush, and Hartmut Neven, “Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes,” Nature communications 9
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Edward Grant, Marcello Benedetti, Shuxiang Cao, Andrew Hallam, Joshua Lockhart, Vid Stojevic, Andrew G Green, and Simone Severini, “Hierarchical quantum classifiers,” npj Quantum Information 4
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
2020
Later among the works it cites.
N Gigena, Marco Di Tullio, and R Rossignoli, “One-body entanglement as a quantum resource in fermionic systems,” Physical Review A 102
2020
Later among the works it cites.
2020
Later among the works it cites.
2020
Later among the works it cites.
2020
Later among the works it cites.
2020
Later among the works it cites.
Adrián Pérez-Salinas, Alba Cervera-Lierta, Elies Gil-Fuster, and José I Latorre, “Data re-uploading for a universal quantum classifier,” Quantum 4
2020
Later among the works it cites.
2020
Later among the works it cites.
Amira Abbas, David Sutter, Christa Zoufal, Aurélien Lucchi, Alessio Figalli, and Stefan Woerner, “The power of quantum neural networks,” Nature Computational Science 1
2021
Closest in time.
2021
Closest in time.
Supanut Thanaslip and et. al, “Manuscript in progress,” (2021)
2021
Closest in time.
2021
Closest in time.
2021
Closest in time.
2021
Closest in time.
Louis Schatzki, Andrew Arrasmith, Patrick J. Coles, and M. Cerezo, “Ntangled dataset,” (2021)
2021
Closest in time.
Maria Schuld, Ryan Sweke, and Johannes Jakob Meyer, “Effect of data encoding on the expressive power of variational quantum-machine-learning models,” Physical Review A 103
2021
Closest in time.
2021
Closest in time.
M. Cerezo and Patrick J Coles, “Higher order derivatives of quantum neural networks with barren plateaus,” Quantum Science and Technology 6
2021
Closest in time.
2021
Closest in time.
Ewin Tang, “Quantum Principal Component Analysis Only Achieves an Exponential Speedup Because of Its State Preparation Assumptions,” Physical Review Letters 127
2021
Closest in time.
Jacob L. Beckey, N. Gigena, Patrick J. Coles, and M. Cerezo, “Computable and operationally meaningful multipartite entanglement measures,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127
2021
Closest in time.