Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Albeit the tremendous performance improvements in designing complex artificial intelligence (AI) systems in data-intensive domains, the black-box nature of these systems leads to the lack of trustworthiness.
A sequential algorithm for training text classifiers. In SIGIR ’94
David D. Lewis and William A. Gale. 1994 · 1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
Monte Carlo Implementation of Gaussian Process Models for Bayesian Regression and Classification
Radford M Neal. 1997 · 1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
Gaussian processes in machine learning. Springer, 63–71
Carl E Rasmussen. 2003 · 2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Engineering Design via Surrogate Modelling - A Practical Guide
Alexander I. J. Forrester, Andras Sobester, and Andy J. Keane. 2008 · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
F. Pedregosa and et al. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
SLIC Superpixels Compared to State-of-the-Art Superpixel Methods
Radhakrishna Achanta, Appu Shaji, Kevin Smith, Aurélien Lucchi, Pascal Fua, and Sabine Süsstrunk. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Olga Russakovsky, Jia Deng, Hao Su, Jonathan Krause, Sanjeev Satheesh, Sean Ma, Zhiheng Huang, Andrej Karpathy, Aditya Khosla, Michael Bernstein, Alexander C. Berg, and Li Fei-Fei. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Taking the human out of the loop: A review of Bayesian optimization
B Shahriari, K Swersky, Z Wang, Ryan P Adams, and N De Freitas. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
GPyOpt: A Bayesian Optimization framework in Python
The GPyOpt authors. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
Kaiming He, X. Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Why should i trust you? Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD . 1135–1144
Marco T Ribeiro, S Singh, and C Guestrin. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
UCI Machine Learning Repository
Dheeru Dua and Casey Graff. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions
Scott M Lundberg and Su-In Lee. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Learning important features through propagating activation differences. In Proceedings of ICML . PMLR, 3145–3153
A Shrikumar, P Greenside, and A Kundaje. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Peeking inside the black-box: a survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI)
Amina Adadi and Mohammed Berrada. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Explaining Deep Learning Models–A Bayesian Non-parametric Approach
Wenbo Guo, Sui Huang, Yunzhe Tao, Xinyu Xing, and Lin Lin. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Explanations can be manipulated and geometry is to blame. In NeurIPS
Ann-Kathrin Dombrowski, Maximilian Alber, Christopher J. Anders, Marcel Ackermann, Klaus-Robert Müller, and Pan Kessel. 2019 · 2019
Muhammad R. Zafar and N. M. Khan. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Deep Learning Based Attack On Social Authentication System
Wei Zhou, Xiao-Fang Yuan, Wenjun Chai, and Hui Ma. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
On local optimizers of acquisition functions in bayesian optimization. In Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases . Springer, 675–690
Jungtaek Kim and Seungjin Choi. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methods
Dylan S, S Hilgard, E Jia, S Singh, and H Lakkaraju. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Improving LIME Robustness with Smarter Locality Sampling
Sean Saito, Eugene Chua, Nicholas Capel, and Rocco Hu. 2020 · 2020
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
Explaining Explanations in AI
Brent Daniel Mittelstadt, Chris Russell, and Sandra Wachter. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Variable selection for Gaussian processes via sensitivity analysis of the posterior predictive distribution. In AISTATS . PMLR, 1743–1752
T Paananen, J Piironen, M Andersen, and A Vehtari. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-Based Localization
Ramprasaath R. Selvaraju, Abhishek Das, Ramakrishna Vedantam, Michael Cogswell, Devi Parikh, and Dhruv Batra. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
ALIME: Autoencoder based approach for local interpretability. In IDEAL . Springer, 454–463
S M Shankaranarayana and D Runje. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
One pixel attack for fooling deep neural networks
Jiawei Su, Danilo Vasconcellos Vargas, and Kouichi Sakurai. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Gaussian process optimization in the bandit setting: no regret and experimental design. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning . 1015–1022
Niranjan Srinivas, Andreas Krause, Sham Kakade, and Matthias Seeger. 2010a
Cited in the paper.
Later among the works it cites.
Reliable Post hoc Explanations: Modeling Uncertainty in Explainability
Dylan Slack, Sophie Hilgard, Sameer Singh, and Himabindu Lakkaraju. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Statistical stability indices for LIME: obtaining reliable explanations for Machine Learning models
Giorgio V, Enrico B, F. Chesani, Alessandro P, and D. Capuzzo. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
OptiLIME: Optimized LIME Explanations for Diagnostic Computer Algorithms
G. Visani, E. Bagli, and F. Chesani. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
BayLIME: Bayesian Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations
Xingyu Zhao, Xiaowei Huang, Valentin Robu, and David Flynn. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Adversarial Attack Vulnerability of Deep Learning Models for Oncologic Images. In medRxiv
Marina Z. Joel, Sachin Umrao, Enoch Chang, Rachel Choi, D. X. Yang, Antonio M. P. Omuro, Roy S Herbst, Harlan M. Krumholz, and Sanjay Aneja. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.