Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Shapley values are widely used to explain black-box models, but they are costly to calculate because they require many model evaluations.
Aas, K., Jullum, M., and Løland, A. (2019) · 1903
Earlier work this paper cites.
Estimation of the Shapley value by ergodic sampling
Illés, F. and Kerényi, P. (2019) · 1906
Earlier work this paper cites.
A value for n-person games
Shapley, L. S. (1953) · 1953
Earlier work this paper cites.
Extremal principle solutions of games in characteristic function form: core, Chebychev and Shapley value generalizations
Charnes, A., Golany, B., Keane, M., and Rousseau, J. (1988) · 1988
Earlier work this paper cites.
Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function
Cybenko, G. (1989) · 1989
Earlier work this paper cites.
Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks
Hornik, K. (1991) · 1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
Scaling up the accuracy of naive-bayes classifiers: A decision-tree hybrid
Kohavi, R. et al. (1996) · 1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
The family of least square values for transferable utility games
Ruiz, L. M., Valenciano, F., and Zarzuelo, J. M. (1998) · 1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
Analysis of regression in game theory approach
Lipovetsky, S. and Conklin, M. (2001) · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Restricting the flow: Information bottlenecks for attribution
Schulz, K., Sixt, L., Tombari, F., and Landgraf, T. (2020) · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Polynomial calculation of the Shapley value based on sampling
Castro, J., Gómez, D., and Tejada, J. (2009) · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images
Krizhevsky, A., Hinton, G., et al. (2009) · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
A data-driven approach to predict the success of bank telemarketing
Moro, S., Cortez, P., and Rita, P. (2014) · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Explaining prediction models and individual predictions with feature contributions
Štrumbelj, E. and Kononenko, I. (2014) · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
A proactive intelligent decision support system for predicting the popularity of online news
Fernandes, K., Vinagre, P., and Cortez, P. (2015) · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system
Chen, T. and Guestrin, C. (2016) · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Algorithmic Transparency via Quantitative Input Influence: Theory and Experiments with Learning Systems
Datta, A., Sen, S., and Zick, Y. (2016) · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Deep residual learning for image recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016) · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Financial ratios and corporate governance indicators in bankruptcy prediction: A comprehensive study
Liang, D., Lu, C.-C., Tsai, C.-F., and Shih, G.-A. (2016) · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Real time image saliency for black box classifiers
Dabkowski, P. and Gal, Y. (2017) · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
UCI machine learning repository
Dua, D. and Graff, C. (2017) · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
INVASE: Instance-wise variable selection using neural networks
Yoon, J., Jordon, J., and van der Schaar, M. (2018) · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Explaining deep neural networks with a polynomial time algorithm for Shapley value approximation
Ancona, M., Oztireli, C., and Gross, M. (2019) · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
CXPlain: Causal explanations for model interpretation under uncertainty
Schwab, P. and Karlen, W. (2019) · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Understanding global feature contributions with additive importance measures
Covert, I., Lundberg, S., and Lee, S.-I. (2020) · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Shapley explainability on the data manifold
Frye, C., de Mijolla, D., Begley, T., Cowton, L., Stanley, M., and Feige, I. (2020) · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
FastAI: A layered API for deep learning
Howard, J. and Gugger, S. (2020) · 2020
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
LightGBM: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree
Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., Ma, W., Ye, Q., and Liu, T.-Y. (2017) · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
A unified approach to interpreting model predictions
Lundberg, S. M. and Lee, S.-I. (2017) · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Grad-CAM: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization
Selvaraju, R. R., Cogswell, M., Das, A., Vedantam, R., Parikh, D., and Batra, D. (2017) · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Learning important features through propagating activation differences
Shrikumar, A., Greenside, P., and Kundaje, A. (2017) · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Smoothgrad: removing noise by adding noise
Smilkov, D., Thorat, N., Kim, B., Viégas, F., and Wattenberg, M. (2017) · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Axiomatic attribution for deep networks
Sundararajan, M., Taly, A., and Yan, Q. (2017) · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Later among the works it cites.
Feature relevance quantification in explainable AI: A causal problem
Janzing, D., Minorics, L., and Blöbaum, P. (2020) · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees
Lundberg, S. M., Erion, G., Chen, H., DeGrave, A., Prutkin, J. M., Nair, B., Katz, R., Himmelfarb, J., Bansal, N., and Lee, S.-I. (2020) · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Improving KernelSHAP: Practical Shapley value estimation using linear regression
Covert, I. and Lee, S.-I. (2021) · 2021
Closest in time.
Explaining by removing: A unified framework for model explanation
Covert, I., Lundberg, S., and Lee, S.-I. (2021) · 2021
Closest in time.
Have we learned to explain?: How interpretability methods can learn to encode predictions in their interpretations
Jethani, N., Sudarshan, M., Aphinyanaphongs, Y., and Ranganath, R. (2021) · 2021
Closest in time.
Sampling permutations for Shapley value estimation
Mitchell, R., Cooper, J., Frank, E., and Holmes, G. (2021) · 2021
Closest in time.
On the tractability of SHAP explanations
Van den Broeck, G., Lykov, A., Schleich, M., and Suciu, D. (2021) · 2021
Closest in time.
Shapley explanation networks
Wang, R., Wang, X., and Inouye, D. I. (2021) · 2021
Closest in time.