Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
LIGO interferometer is considered the most sensitive and complicated gravitational experimental equipment ever built.
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Krizhevsky, ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks, NeurIPS Proceedings, (2012)
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. P. Abbott et al., “Characterization of transient noise in Advanced LIGO relevant to gravitational wave signal GW150914,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 33, no. 13, p. 134001, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/33/13/134001
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Zevin, S. Coughlin, S. Bahaadini, E. Besler, N. Rohani, S. Allen, M. Cabero, K. Crowston, A. K. Katsaggelos, S. L. Larson, T. K. Lee, C. Lintott, T. B. Littenberg, A. Lundgren, C. Østerlund, J. R. Smith, L. Trouille, and V. Kalogera, “Gravity Spy: integrating advanced LIGO detector characterization, machine learning, and citizen science,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 34, no. 6, p. 064003, 2017
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
George, Daniel, Shen, Hongyu, Huerta, E.A. (2017). Glitch Classification and Clustering for LIGO with Deep Transfer Learning. Workshop on Deep Learning for Physical Sciences (DLPS 2017), NIPS 2017, Long Beach, CA, USA
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Bahaadini, N. Rohani, S. Coughlin, M. Zevin, V. Kalogera, and A. K. Katsaggelos, “Deep multiview models for glitch classification,” 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2017
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Bahaadini et al., “Machine learning for Gravity Spy: Glitch classification and dataset,” Information Sciences, vol. 444, pp. 172–186, May 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2018.02.068
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Coughlin, Scott. (2018). Updated Gravity Spy Data Set (v1.1.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1476551
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Llorens-Monteagudo, A. Torres-Forné, J. A. Font, and A. Marquina, “Classification of gravitational-wave glitches via dictionary learning,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 36, no. 7, p. 075005, 2019
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Coughlin, S. Bahaadini, N. Rohani, M. Zevin, O. Patane, M. Harandi, C. Jackson, V. Noroozi, S. Allen, J. Areeda, M. Coughlin, P. Ruiz, C. P. L. Berry, K. Crowston, A. K. Katsaggelos, A. Lundgren, C. Østerlund, J. R. Smith, L. Trouille, and V. Kalogera, “Classifying the unknown: Discovering novel gravitational-wave detector glitches using similarity learning,” Physical Review D, vol. 99, no. 8, 2019
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
] R. H. Brandenberger, “Is the spectrum of gravitational waves the ‘Holy Grail’ of inflation?,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 79, no. 5, May 2019, doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6883-4
A. Ghosh, Fundamental Concepts of ConvolutionalNeural Network, Recent Trends and Advances in Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things, (2020)
2020
Later among the works it cites.
R. E. Colgan et al., “Efficient gravitational-wave glitch identification from environmental data through machine learning,” Physical Review D, vol. 101, no. 10, May 2020, doi: 10.1103/physrevd.101.102003
2020
Later among the works it cites.
“Zooniverse,” Zooniverse.org, 2021. https://www.zooniverse.org/projects /zooniverse/gravity-spy/about/research (accessed Jul. 04, 2021)
2021
Closest in time.
S. Doughton, “Ripples in space-time or 3-pound bird? Ravens at Hanford foul test of Einstein’s theory,” The Seattle Times, May 14, 2018. https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/science/suddenly-there-came-a-tapping-ravens-cause-blipsin-massive-physics-instrument-at-hanford/ (accessed Jul. 04, 2021)
2021
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
V. Phung and E. Rhee, A High‐Accuracy Model Average Ensemble of Convolutional Neural Networks for Classification of Cloud Image Patches on Small Datasets, Applied Sciences 9 (2019)
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
R. E. Colgan, K. R. Corley, Y. Lau, I. Bartos, J. N. Wright, Z. Márka, and S. Márka, “Efficient gravitational-wave glitch identification from environmental data through machine learning,” Physical Review D, vol. 101, no. 10, 2020
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
D. Davis, L. V. White, and P. R. Saulson, “Utilizing aLIGO glitch classifications to validate gravitational-wave candidates,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 37, no. 14, p. 145001, 2020
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Michimura, T. Fujita, S. Morisaki, H. Nakatsuka, and I. Obata, “Ultralight vector dark matter search with auxiliary length channels of gravitational wave detectors,” Physical Review D, vol. 102, no. 10, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1103/physrevd.102.102001
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
A. U. Ruby, D. I. Prasannavenkatesan Theerthagiri, and Y. Vamsidhar, Binary cross entropy with deep learning technique for image classification, International Journal 9 (2020)
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
I. Kandel, M. Castelli, and A. Popoviˇc, Comparative study of first order optimizers for image classification using convolutional neural networks on histopathology images, Journal of Imaging 6, 92 (2020)
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
A. U. Ruby, D. I. Prasannavenkatesan Theerthagiri, and Y. Vamsidhar, Binary cross entropy with deep learning technique for image classification, International Journal 9 (2020)
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
V. Nair and G. Hinton, “Rectified Linear Units Improve Restricted Boltzmann Machines,.” [Online]. Available: https://www.cs.toronto.edu/ fritz/absps/reluICML.pdf
Cited in the paper.
“Gravitational waves from inflation,” Www.sif.it, 2015. https://www.sif.it/riviste/sif/ncr/econtents/2016/039/09/article/0 (accessed Jul. 04, 2021)
2021
Closest in time.
2021
Closest in time.
M. H. Esfe, S. A. Eftekhari, M. Hekmatifar, and D. Toghraie, “A well-trained artificial neural network for predicting the rheological behavior of MWCNT–Al2O3 (30–70%)/oil SAE40 hybrid nanofluid,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 17696, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96808-4
2021
Closest in time.
Wikipedia Contributors, “File:Roc-draft-xkcd-style.svg,” Wikipedia, 2022. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Roc-draft-xkcd-style.svg (accessed Apr. 30, 2022)
2022
Closest in time.
R. Abbott et al., “GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 Solar Mass Black Hole with a 2.6 Solar Mass Compact Object,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 896, no. 2, p. L44, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab960f
2041
Closest in time.
J. Calderón Bustillo, S. Leong, T. Dietrich and P. Lasky, ”Mapping the Universe Expansion: Enabling Percent-level Measurements of the Hubble Constant with a Single Binary Neutron-star Merger Detection”, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 912, no. 1, p. L10, 2021. Available: 10.3847/2041-8213/abf502
2041
Closest in time.
W. M. Farr, M. Fishbach, J. Ye, and D. E. Holz, “A Future Percent-level Measurement of the Hubble Expansion at Redshift 0.8 with Advanced LIGO,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 883, no. 2, p. L42, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab4284
2041
Closest in time.