Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
The existence of incompatible measurements is often believed to be a feature of quantum theory which signals its inconsistency with any classical worldview.
D. Gottesman, Stabilizer codes and quantum error correction , Ph.D. thesis , California Institute of Technology (1997), arXiv:quant-ph/9705052
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Busch, M. Grabowski, and P. J. Lahti, Operational quantum physics , Vol. 31 (Springer Science & Business Media, 1997)
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. W. Spekkens, “Contextuality for preparations, transformations, and unsharp measurements,” Phys. Rev. A 71
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. W. Spekkens, “Negativity and Contextuality are Equivalent Notions of Nonclassicality,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Heinosaari, D. Reitzner, and P. Stano, “Notes on joint measurability of quantum observables,” Found. Phys. 38
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. W. Spekkens, D. H. Buzacott, A. J. Keehn, B. Toner, and G. J. Pryde, “Preparation Contextuality Powers Parity-Oblivious Multiplexing,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. J. Hoban, E. T. Campbell, K. Loukopoulos, and D. E. Browne, “Non-adaptive measurement-based quantum computation and multi-party Bell inequalities,” New J. Phys. 13
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y.-C. Liang, R. W. Spekkens, and H. M. Wiseman, “Specker’s parable of the overprotective seer: A road to contextuality, nonlocality and complementarity,” Physics Reports 506
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. García-Patrón, N. J. Cerf, T. C. Ralph, J. H. Shapiro, and S. Lloyd, “Gaussian quantum information,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 84
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Fritz, “Beyond Bell’s theorem: correlation scenarios,” New J. Phys. 14
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Raussendorf, “Contextuality in measurement-based quantum computation,” Phys. Rev. A 88
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. F. Pusey, “Anomalous Weak Values Are Proofs of Contextuality,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. W. Spekkens, “The Status of Determinism in Proofs of the Impossibility of a Noncontextual Model of Quantum Theory,” Found. Phys. 44
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Kunjwal and R. W. Spekkens, “From the Kochen-Specker Theorem to Noncontextuality Inequalities without Assuming Determinism,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
C. J. Wood and R. W. Spekkens, “The lesson of causal discovery algorithms for quantum correlations: Causal explanations of Bell-inequality violations require fine-tuning,” New J. Phys. 17
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
R. W. Spekkens, “Quasi-Quantization: Classical Statistical Theories with an Epistemic Restriction,” in Quantum Theory: Informational Foundations and Foils , edited by G. Chiribella and R. W. Spekkens (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2016) pp. 83–135
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
D. Saha, P. Horodecki, and M. Pawłowski, “State independent contextuality advances one-way communication,” New J. Phys. 21
2019
Later among the works it cites.
R. Kunjwal, M. Lostaglio, and M. F. Pusey, “Anomalous weak values and contextuality: Robustness, tightness, and imaginary parts,” Phys. Rev. A 100
2019
Later among the works it cites.
R. Kunjwal, “Beyond the Cabello-Severini-Winter framework: Making sense of contextuality without sharpness of measurements,” Quantum 3
2019
Later among the works it cites.
E. Wolfe, R. W. Spekkens, and T. Fritz, “The Inflation Technique for Causal Inference with Latent Variables,” J. Causal Inference 7
2019
Later among the works it cites.
M. Lostaglio and G. Senno, “Contextual advantage for state-dependent cloning,” Quantum 4
2020
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
A. Chailloux, I. Kerenidis, S. Kundu, and J. Sikora, “Optimal bounds for parity-oblivious random access codes,” New J. Phys. 18
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
M. D. Mazurek, M. F. Pusey, R. Kunjwal, K. J. Resch, and R. W. Spekkens, “An experimental test of noncontextuality without unphysical idealizations,” Nat. Comm. 7
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Kunjwal, “Contextuality beyond the Kochen-Specker theorem,” arXiv:1612.07250 (2016)
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
T. Fritz, “Beyond Bell’s theorem II: Scenarios with arbitrary causal structure,” Comm. Math. Phys. 341
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
L. Guerini, J. Bavaresco, M. Terra Cunha, and A. Acín, “Operational framework for quantum measurement simulability,” J. Math. Phys. 58
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Krishna, R. W. Spekkens, and E. Wolfe, “Deriving robust noncontextuality inequalities from algebraic proofs of the Kochen-Specker theorem: the Peres-Mermin square,” New J. Phys. 19
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
D. Schmid and R. W. Spekkens, “Contextual advantage for state discrimination,” Phys. Rev. X 8
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
D. Schmid, R. W. Spekkens, and E. Wolfe, “All the noncontextuality inequalities for arbitrary prepare-and-measure experiments with respect to any fixed set of operational equivalences,” Phys. Rev. A 97
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Lostaglio, “Certifying Quantum Signatures in Thermodynamics and Metrology via Contextuality of Quantum Linear Response,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125
2020
Later among the works it cites.
2020
Later among the works it cites.
A. Tavakoli and R. Uola, “Measurement incompatibility and steering are necessary and sufficient for operational contextuality,” Phys. Rev. Research 2
2020
Later among the works it cites.
R. Kunjwal, “Hypergraph framework for irreducible noncontextuality inequalities from logical proofs of the Kochen-Specker theorem,” Quantum 4
2020
Later among the works it cites.
2021
Closest in time.
F. Shahandeh, “Contextuality of General Probabilistic Theories,” PRX Quantum 2
2021
Closest in time.
2021
Closest in time.
2021
Closest in time.