Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Current vision systems are trained on huge datasets, and these datasets come with costs: curation is expensive, they inherit human biases, and there are concerns over privacy and usage rights.
Statistics of television signals
E. R. Kretzmer · 1952
Earlier work this paper cites.
Lightness and retinex theory
Edwin H. Land and John J. McCann · 1971
Earlier work this paper cites.
The fractal geometry of nature
Benoit B Mandelbrot · 1982
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fractal-based Description of Natural Scenes
A.P. Pentland · 1983
Earlier work this paper cites.
The laplacian pyramid as a compact image code
P. Burt and E. Adelson · 1983
Earlier work this paper cites.
Color and spatial structure in natural scenes
G. J. Burton and Ian R. Moorhead · 1987
Earlier work this paper cites.
Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells
D. J. Field · 1987
Earlier work this paper cites.
Scale-invariance and Self-similar ’Wavelet’ Transforms: an Analysis of Natural Scenes and Mammalian Visual Systems
David J Field · 1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
Performance of optical flow techniques
J.L. Barron, D.J. Fleet, and S.S. Beauchemin · 1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
Pyramid-based texture analysis/synthesis
David J. Heeger and James R. Bergen · 1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
Pyramid-based texture analysis/synthesis
D.J. Heeger and J.R. Bergen · 1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
Origins of scaling in natural images
Daniel L. Ruderman · 1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
Modeling the joint statistics of images in the wavelet domain
Eero P. Simoncelli · 1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
A parametric texture model based on joint statistics of complex wavelet coefficients
J. Portilla and E. P Simoncelli · 2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
Occlusion models for natural images: A statistical study of a scale-invariant dead leaves model
A. B Lee, D. Mumford, and J. Huang · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
On benchmarking optical flow
B McCane, K Novins, D Crannitch, and B Galvin · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Statistics of natural image categories
Antonio Torralba and Aude Oliva · 2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Sparse coding of sensory inputs
Bruno A Olshausen and David J Field · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Statistical modeling of photographic images
E P Simoncelli · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Spectral statistics in natural scenes predict hue, saturation, and brightness
Fuhui Long, Zhiyong Yang, and Dale Purves · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fractal-like image statistics in visual art: similarity to natural scenes
Christoph Redies, Jens Hasenstein, and Joachim Denzler · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
A database and evaluation methodology for optical flow
Simon Baker, Stefan Roth, Daniel Scharstein, Michael J. Black, J.P. Lewis, and Richard Szeliski · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Multiscaling and information content of natural color images
Antonio Turiel, Nestor Parga, Daniel L. Ruderman, and Thomas W. Cronin · 2009
Cited alongside, same era.
Visualizing higher-layer features of a deep network
Dumitru Erhan, Yoshua Bengio, Aaron Courville, and Pascal Vincent · 2009
Cited alongside, same era.
Exact feature probabilities in images with occlusion, 2010
Xaq Pitkow · 2010
Cited alongside, same era.
An Analysis of Single-Layer Networks in Unsupervised Feature Learning
Adam Coates, Andrew Ng, and Honglak Lee · 2011
Cited alongside, same era.
A naturalistic open source movie for optical flow evaluation
D. J. Butler, J. Wulff, G. B. Stanley, and M. J. Black · 2012
Cited alongside, same era.
Retinal waves coordinate patterned activity throughout the developing visual system
James B Ackman, Timothy J Burbridge, and Michael C Crair · 2012
Ingan: Capturing and remapping the "dna" of a natural image
Assaf Shocher, Shai Bagon, Phillip Isola, and Michal Irani · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Singan: Learning a generative model from a single natural image
Tamar Rott Shaham, Tali Dekel, and Tomer Michaeli · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Classification accuracy score for conditional generative models
Suman Ravuri and Oriol Vinyals · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
The visual task adaptation benchmark
Xiaohua Zhai, Joan Puigcerver, Alexander Kolesnikov, Pierre Ruyssen, Carlos Riquelme, Mario Lucic, Josip Djolonga, Andre Susano Pinto, Maxim Neumann, Alexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Olivier Bachem, Michael Tschannen, Marcin Michalski, Olivier Bousquet, Sylvain Gelly, and Neil Houlsby · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
MineRL: A large-scale dataset of Minecraft demonstrations
William H. Guss, Brandon Houghton, Nicholay Topin, Phillip Wang, Cayden Codel, Manuela Veloso, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
Invariant scattering convolution networks
Joan Bruna and Stephane Mallat · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
Generative adversarial nets
Ian Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Olga Russakovsky, Jia Deng, Hao Su, Jonathan Krause, Sanjeev Satheesh, Sean Ma, Zhiheng Huang, Andrej Karpathy, Aditya Khosla, Michael Bernstein, Alexander C. Berg, and Li Fei-Fei · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Flownet: Learning optical flow with convolutional networks
A. Dosovitskiy, P. Fischer, E. Ilg, P. Häusser, C. Hazırbaş, V. Golkov, P. v.d. Smagt, D. Cremers, and T. Brox · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
A large dataset to train convolutional networks for disparity, optical flow, and scene flow estimation
Nikolaus Mayer, Eddy Ilg, Philip Häusser, Philipp Fischer, Daniel Cremers, Alexey Dosovitskiy, and Thomas Brox · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Domain randomization for transferring deep neural networks from simulation to the real world, 2017
Josh Tobin, Rachel Fong, Alex Ray, Jonas Schneider, Wojciech Zaremba, and Pieter Abbeel · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Yonglong Tian, Dilip Krishnan, and Phillip Isola · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Improved precision and recall metric for assessing generative models
Tuomas Kynkäänniemi, Tero Karras, Samuli Laine, Jaakko Lehtinen, and Timo Aila · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Improved baselines with momentum contrastive learning, 2020
Xinlei Chen, Haoqi Fan, Ross Girshick, and Kaiming He · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
A critical analysis of self-supervision, or what we can learn from a single image
Yuki M Asano, Christian Rupprecht, and Andrea Vedaldi · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Analyzing and improving the image quality of stylegan
Tero Karras, Samuli Laine, Miika Aittala, Janne Hellsten, Jaakko Lehtinen, and Timo Aila · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
This dataset does not exist: training models from generated images
Victor Besnier, Himalaya Jain, Andrei Bursuc, Matthieu Cord, and Patrick Pérez · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Harmonic convolutional networks based on discrete cosine transform
Matej Ulicny, Vladimir A. Krylov, and Rozenn Dahyot · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Understanding contrastive representation learning through alignment and uniformity on the hypersphere
Tongzhou Wang and Phillip Isola · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
A large-scale study of representation learning with the visual task adaptation benchmark, 2020
Xiaohua Zhai, Joan Puigcerver, Alexander Kolesnikov, Pierre Ruyssen, Carlos Riquelme, Mario Lucic, Josip Djolonga, Andre Susano Pinto, Maxim Neumann, Alexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Olivier Bachem, Michael Tschannen, Marcin Michalski, Olivier Bousquet, Sylvain Gelly, and Neil Houlsby · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
What makes for good views for contrastive learning?
Yonglong Tian, Chen Sun, Ben Poole, Dilip Krishnan, Cordelia Schmid, and Phillip Isola · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Self-supervised pretraining of visual features in the wild, 2021
Priya Goyal, Mathilde Caron, Benjamin Lefaudeux, Min Xu, Pengchao Wang, Vivek Pai, Mannat Singh, Vitaliy Liptchinsky, Ishan Misra, Armand Joulin, and Piotr Bojanowski · 2021
Closest in time.
Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision
Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al · 2021
Closest in time.
Generative models as a data source for multiview representation learning, 2021
Ali Jahanian, Xavier Puig, Yonglong Tian, and Phillip Isola · 2021
Closest in time.
Datasetgan: Efficient labeled data factory with minimal human effort
Yuxuan Zhang, Huan Ling, Jun Gao, Kangxue Yin, Jean-Francois Lafleche, Adela Barriuso, Antonio Torralba, and Sanja Fidler · 2021
Closest in time.
Repurposing gans for one-shot semantic part segmentation
Nontawat Tritrong, Pitchaporn Rewatbowornwong, and Supasorn Suwajanakorn · 2021
Closest in time.
Semantic segmentation with generative models: Semi-supervised learning and strong out-of-domain generalization
Daiqing Li, Junlin Yang, Kreis Karsten, Torralba Antonio, and Sanja Fidler · 2021
Closest in time.
Pre-training without natural images, 2021
Hirokatsu Kataoka, Kazushige Okayasu, Asato Matsumoto, Eisuke Yamagata, Ryosuke Yamada, Nakamasa Inoue, Akio Nakamura, and Yutaka Satoh · 2021
Closest in time.