Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Partial differential equations (PDEs) that fit scientific data can represent physical laws with explainable mechanisms for various mathematically-oriented subjects, such as physics and finance.
The equation of groundwater flow in fixed and deforming coordinates
Hilton H Cooper Jr. 1966 · 1966
Earlier work this paper cites.
Neural algorithm for solving differential equations
Hyuk Lee and In Seok Kang. 1990 · 1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
Discovering dynamics: from inductive logic programming to machine discovery
Saso Dzeroski and Ljupco Todorovski. 1995 · 1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
Artificial neural networks for solving ordinary and partial differential equations
Isaac E. Lagaris, Aristidis C. Likas, and Dimitrios Ioannis Fotiadis. 1998 · 1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
Convergence study of the truncated Karhunen–Loeve expansion for simulation of stochastic processes
SP Huang, ST Quek, and KK Phoon. 2001 · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Stochastic methods for flow in porous media: coping with uncertainties
Dongxiao Zhang. 2001 · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
An efficient, high-order perturbation approach for flow in random porous media via Karhunen–Loeve and polynomial expansions
Dongxiao Zhang and Zhiming Lu. 2004 · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Automated reverse engineering of nonlinear dynamical systems
Josh Bongard and Hod Lipson. 2007 · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Distilling free-form natural laws from experimental data
Michael Schmidt and Hod Lipson. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems
Steven L Brunton, Joshua L Proctor, and J Nathan Kutz. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Convolutional neural networks for steady flow approximation. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining . 481–490
Xiaoxiao Guo, Wei Li, and Francesco Iorio. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Optnet: Differentiable optimization as a layer in neural networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning . PMLR, 136–145
Brandon Amos and J Zico Kolter. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Deep learning in fluid dynamics
J Nathan Kutz. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Data-driven discovery of partial differential equations
Samuel H Rudy, Steven L Brunton, Joshua L Proctor, and J Nathan Kutz. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Learning partial differential equations via data discovery and sparse optimization
Hayden Schaeffer. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Solving high-dimensional partial differential equations using deep learning
Jiequn Han, Arnulf Jentzen, and Weinan E. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Learning Particle Dynamics for Manipulating Rigid Bodies, Deformable Objects, and Fluids. In International Conference on Learning Representations
Yunzhu Li, Jiajun Wu, Russ Tedrake, Joshua B Tenenbaum, and Antonio Torralba. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Pde-net: Learning pdes from data. In International Conference on Machine Learning . PMLR, 3208–3216
Zichao Long, Yiping Lu, Xianzhong Ma, and Bin Dong. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Neural networks trained to solve differential equations learn general representations. In 32nd Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems
Martin Magill, Faisal Qureshi, and Hendrick W de Haan. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Deep dynamical modeling and control of unsteady fluid flows. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems . 9278–9288
Jeremy Morton, Freddie D Witherden, Antony Jameson, and Mykel J Kochenderfer. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Hidden physics models: Machine learning of nonlinear partial differential equations
Maziar Raissi and George Em Karniadakis. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Learning equations for extrapolation and control. In International Conference on Machine Learning . PMLR, 4442–4450
Subham Sahoo, Christoph Lampert, and Georg Martius. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
DGM: A deep learning algorithm for solving partial differential equations
Justin Sirignano and Konstantinos Spiliopoulos. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Bayesian deep convolutional encoder–decoder networks for surrogate modeling and uncertainty quantification
Yinhao Zhu and Nicholas Zabaras. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Learning data-driven discretizations for partial differential equations
Yohai Bar-Sinai, Stephan Hoyer, Jason Hickey, and Michael P Brenner. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Solver-in-the-loop: Learning from differentiable physics to interact with iterative PDE-solvers. In 34nd Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems
Kiwon Um, Robert Brand, Philipp Holl, Nils Thuerey, et al · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Deep learning of subsurface flow via theory-guided neural network
Nanzhe Wang, Dongxiao Zhang, Haibin Chang, and Heng Li. 2020b · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
DLGA-PDE: Discovery of PDEs with incomplete candidate library via combination of deep learning and genetic algorithm
Hao Xu, Haibin Chang, and Dongxiao Zhang. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Theory-guided hard constraint projection (HCP): A knowledge-based data-driven scientific machine learning method
Yuntian Chen, Dou Huang, Dongxiao Zhang, Junsheng Zeng, Nanzhe Wang, Haoran Zhang, and Jinyue Yan. 2021a · 2021
Closest in time.
Physics-informed learning of governing equations from scarce data
Zhao Chen, Yang Liu, and Hao Sun. 2021b · 2021
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Data-driven discovery of coordinates and governing equations
Kathleen Champion, Bethany Lusch, J Nathan Kutz, and Steven L Brunton. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Deep Learning For Symbolic Mathematics. In International Conference on Learning Representations
Guillaume Lample and François Charton. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Learning Compositional Koopman Operators for Model-Based Control. In International Conference on Learning Representations
Yunzhu Li, Hao He, Jiajun Wu, Dina Katabi, and Antonio Torralba. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
PDE-Net 2.0: Learning PDEs from data with a numeric-symbolic hybrid deep network
Zichao Long, Yiping Lu, and Bin Dong. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations
Maziar Raissi, Paris Perdikaris, and George E Karniadakis. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Data-driven identification of parametric partial differential equations
Samuel Rudy, Alessandro Alla, Steven L Brunton, and J Nathan Kutz. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Lagrangian fluid simulation with continuous convolutions. In International Conference on Learning Representations
Benjamin Ummenhofer, Lukas Prantl, Nils Thuerey, and Vladlen Koltun. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
PhyGeoNet: physics-informed geometry-adaptive convolutional neural networks for solving parameterized steady-state PDEs on irregular domain
Han Gao, Luning Sun, and Jian-Xun Wang. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
Learning continuous-time {PDE}s from sparse data with graph neural networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations
Valerii Iakovlev, Markus Heinonen, and Harri Lähdesmäki. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
Physics-informed machine learning
George Em Karniadakis, Ioannis G Kevrekidis, Lu Lu, Paris Perdikaris, Sifan Wang, and Liu Yang. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
Machine learning–accelerated computational fluid dynamics
Dmitrii Kochkov, Jamie A Smith, Ayya Alieva, Qing Wang, Michael P Brenner, and Stephan Hoyer. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
Physical equation discovery using physics-consistent neural network (pcnn) under incomplete observability. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining . 925–933
Haoran Li and Yang Weng. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
Learning nonlinear operators via DeepONet based on the universal approximation theorem of operators
Lu Lu, Pengzhan Jin, Guofei Pang, Zhongqiang Zhang, and George Em Karniadakis. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
Physics-informed deep learning for computational elastodynamics without labeled data
Chengping Rao, Hao Sun, and Yang Liu. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
Differential Spectral Normalization (DSN) for PDE Discovery. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Chi Chiu So, Tsz On Li, Chufang Wu, and Siu Pang Yung. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
Deep-learning of parametric partial differential equations from sparse and noisy data
Hao Xu, Dongxiao Zhang, and Junsheng Zeng. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
Symbolic genetic algorithm for discovering open-form partial differential equations (SGA-PDE)
Yuntian Chen, Yingtao Luo, Qiang Liu, Hao Xu, and Dongxiao Zhang. 2022 · 2022
Closest in time.
Integration of knowledge and data in machine learning
Yuntian Chen and Dongxiao Zhang. 2022 · 2022
Closest in time.
Physics-informed graph neural Galerkin networks: A unified framework for solving PDE-governed forward and inverse problems
Han Gao, Matthew J Zahr, and Jian-Xun Wang. 2022 · 2022
Closest in time.
Learning differential operators for interpretable time series modeling. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining . 1192–1201
Yingtao Luo, Chang Xu, Yang Liu, Weiqing Liu, Shun Zheng, and Jiang Bian. 2022 · 2022
Closest in time.
Discovering Nonlinear PDEs from Scarce Data with Physics-encoded Learning. In International Conference on Learning Representations
Chengping Rao, Pu Ren, Yang Liu, and Hao Sun. 2022 · 2022
Closest in time.