Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Statutory reasoning is the task of determining whether a legal statute, stated in natural language, applies to the text description of a case.
KERMIT: generative insertion-based modeling for sequences
William Chan, Nikita Kitaev, Kelvin Guu, Mitchell Stern, and Jakob Uszkoreit. 2019 · 1906
Earlier work this paper cites.
From ’f’ to ’a’ on the N.Y. regents science exams: An overview of the aristo project
Peter Clark, Oren Etzioni, Daniel Khashabi, Tushar Khot, Bhavana Dalvi Mishra, Kyle Richardson, Ashish Sabharwal, Carissa Schoenick, Oyvind Tafjord, Niket Tandon, Sumithra Bhakthavatsalam, Dirk Groeneveld, Michal Guerquin, and Michael Schmitz. 2019 · 1909
Earlier work this paper cites.
Dbpal: Weak supervision for learning a natural language interface to databases
Nathaniel Weir, Andrew Crotty, Alex Galakatos, Amir Ilkhechi, Shekar Ramaswamy, Rohin Bhushan, Ugur Çetintemel, Prasetya Utama, Nadja Geisler, Benjamin Hättasch, Steffen Eger, and Carsten Binnig. 2019 · 1909
Earlier work this paper cites.
Emad Elwany, Dave Moore, and Gaurav Oberoi. 2019 · 1911
Earlier work this paper cites.
On sentences which are true of direct unions of algebras
Alfred Horn. 1951 · 1951
Earlier work this paper cites.
Judith, a computer program to advise lawyers in reasoning a case
Walter G Popp and Bernhard Schlink. 1974 · 1974
Earlier work this paper cites.
Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions
Mervyn Stone. 1974 · 1974
Earlier work this paper cites.
A computer program for legal planning and analysis: Taxation of stock redemptions
Robert Hellawell. 1980 · 1980
Earlier work this paper cites.
The design of a legal analysis program
Anne v. d. L. Gardner. 1983 · 1983
Earlier work this paper cites.
A field guide to dynamical recurrent networks
John F Kolen and Stefan C Kremer. 2001 · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data
John D. Lafferty, Andrew McCallum, and Fernando C. N. Pereira. 2001 · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Project halo: Towards a digital aristotle
Noah S. Friedland, Paul G. Allen, Gavin Matthews, Michael J. Witbrock, David Baxter, Jon Curtis, Blake Shepard, Pierluigi Miraglia, Jürgen Angele, Steffen Staab, Eddie Mönch, Henrik Oppermann, Dirk Wenke, David J. Israel, Vinay K. Chaudhri, Bruce W. Porter, Ken Barker, James Fan, Shaw Yi Chaw, Peter Z. Yeh, Dan Tecuci, and Peter Clark. 2004 · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
The PASCAL recognising textual entailment challenge
Ido Dagan, Oren Glickman, and Bernardo Magnini. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Automatically classifying case texts and predicting outcomes
Kevin D. Ashley and Stefanie Brüninghaus. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Text modular networks: Learning to decompose tasks in the language of existing models
Tushar Khot, Daniel Khashabi, Kyle Richardson, Peter Clark, and Ashish Sabharwal. 2020 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Design challenges and misconceptions in named entity recognition
Lev-Arie Ratinov and Dan Roth. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Project halo update - progress toward digital aristotle
David Gunning, Vinay K. Chaudhri, Peter Clark, Ken Barker, Shaw Yi Chaw, Mark Greaves, Benjamin N. Grosof, Alice Leung, David D. McDonald, Sunil Mishra, John Pacheco, Bruce W. Porter, Aaron Spaulding, Dan Tecuci, and Jing Tien. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Learning high-level planning from text
S.R.K. Branavan, Nate Kushman, Tao Lei, and Regina Barzilay. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Aligning predicate argument structures in monolingual comparable texts: A new corpus for a new task
Michael Roth and Anette Frank. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Automatically extracting procedural knowledge from instructional texts using natural language processing
Ziqi Zhang, Philip Webster, Victoria S. Uren, Andrea Varga, and Fabio Ciravegna. 2012 · 2012
Cited alongside, same era.
Semantic parsing on freebase from question-answer pairs
Jonathan Berant, Andrew Chou, Roy Frostig, and Percy Liang. 2013 · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
Parsing with compositional vector grammars
Richard Socher, John Bauer, Christopher D. Manning, and Andrew Y. Ng. 2013 · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
PARMA: A predicate argument aligner
Travis Wolfe, Benjamin Van Durme, Mark Dredze, Nicholas Andrews, Charley Beller, Chris Callison-Burch, Jay DeYoung, Justin Snyder, Jonathan Weese, Tan Xu, and Xuchen Yao. 2013 · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
Toward automated international law compliance monitoring (tailcm)
Leora Morgenstern. 2014 · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Scoring coreference partitions of predicted mentions: A reference implementation
Large-scale multi-label text classification on EU legislation
Ilias Chalkidis, Manos Fergadiotis, Prodromos Malakasiotis, and Ion Androutsopoulos. 2019b · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Everything happens for a reason: Discovering the purpose of actions in procedural text
Bhavana Dalvi, Niket Tandon, Antoine Bosselut, Wen-tau Yih, and Peter Clark. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding
Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Combining similarity and transformer methods for case law entailment
Juliano Rabelo, Mi-Young Kim, and Randy Goebel. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Litigation analytics: Case outcomes extracted from US federal court dockets
Thomas Vacek, Ronald Teo, Dezhao Song, Timothy Nugent, Conner Cowling, and Frank Schilder. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Sameer Pradhan, Xiaoqiang Luo, Marta Recasens, Eduard Hovy, Vincent Ng, and Michael Strube. 2014 · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Adam: A method for stochastic optimization
Diederik P. Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2015 · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
The utility of text: The case of amicus briefs and the supreme court
Yanchuan Sim, Bryan R. Routledge, and Noah A. Smith. 2015 · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Neural module networks
Jacob Andreas, Marcus Rohrbach, Trevor Darrell, and Dan Klein. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Judging ordinary meaning
Thomas R Lee and Stephen C Mouritsen. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Towards formalizing statute law as default logic through automatic semantic parsing
Marcos A. Pertierra, Sarah Lawsky, Erik Hemberg, and Una-May O’Reilly. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Snorkel: Rapid training data creation with weak supervision
Alexander Ratner, Stephen H. Bach, Henry R. Ehrenberg, Jason Alan Fries, Sen Wu, and Christopher Ré. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Mining user-generated repair instructions from automotive web communities
Thiemo Wambsganss and Hansjörg Fromm. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Procedural reading comprehension with attribute-aware context flow
Aida Amini, Antoine Bosselut, Bhavana Dalvi Mishra, Yejin Choi, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Performance in the courtroom: Automated processing and visualization of appeal court decisions in france
Paul Boniol, George Panagopoulos, Christos Xypolopoulos, Rajaa El Hamdani, David Restrepo Amariles, and Michalis Vazirgiannis. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Reading the manual: Event extraction as definition comprehension
Yunmo Chen, Tongfei Chen, Seth Ebner, Aaron Steven White, and Benjamin Van Durme. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Neural module networks for reasoning over text
Nitish Gupta, Kevin Lin, Dan Roth, Sameer Singh, and Matt Gardner. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
A dataset for statutory reasoning in tax law entailment and question answering
Nils Holzenberger, Andrew Blair-Stanek, and Benjamin Van Durme. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
The gap between deep learning and law: Predicting employment notice
Jason T. Lam, David Liang, Samuel Dahan, and Farhana H. Zulkernine. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Explaining potentially unfair clauses to the consumer with the CLAUDETTE tool
Rūta Liepiņa, Federico Ruggeri, Francesca Lagioia, Marco Lippi, Kasper Drazewski, and Paolo Torroni. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Learning from task descriptions
Orion Weller, Nicholas Lourie, Matt Gardner, and Matthew E. Peters. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Break it down: A question understanding benchmark
Tomer Wolfson, Mor Geva, Ankit Gupta, Matt Gardner, Yoav Goldberg, Daniel Deutch, and Jonathan Berant. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
JEC-QA: A legal-domain question answering dataset
Haoxi Zhong, Chaojun Xiao, Cunchao Tu, Tianyang Zhang, Zhiyuan Liu, and Maosong Sun. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Stickiness and incomplete contracts
Julian Nyarko. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
A universal part-of-speech tagset
Slav Petrov, Dipanjan Das, and Ryan T. McDonald. 2012 · 2096
Closest in time.
Interpretation of natural language rules in conversational machine reading
Marzieh Saeidi, Max Bartolo, Patrick S. H. Lewis, Sameer Singh, Tim Rocktäschel, Mike Sheldon, Guillaume Bouchard, and Sebastian Riedel. 2018 · 2097
Closest in time.