Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Interpretable machine learning has become a very active area of research due to the rising popularity of machine learning algorithms and their inherently challenging interpretability.
1905
Earlier work this paper cites.
Eckart C, Young G (1936) The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank. Psychometrika 1(3):211–218
1936
Earlier work this paper cites.
Shapley LS (1953) A value for n-person games. Contributions to the Theory of Games 2(28):307–317
1953
Earlier work this paper cites.
Wold S, Albano C, Dunn WJ, Edlund U, Esbensen K, Geladi P, Hellberg S, Johansson E, Lindberg W, Sjöström M (1984) Multivariate Data Analysis in Chemistry, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 17–95
1984
Earlier work this paper cites.
Toloşi L, Lengauer T (2011) Classification with correlated features: Unreliability of feature ranking and solutions. Bioinformatics 27(14):1986–1994
1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
Tibshirani R (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 58(1):267–288
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Machine Learning 45(1):5–32
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Friedman JH (2001) Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals of statistics pp 1189–1232
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Caputo B, Sim K, Furesjö F, Smola A (2002) Appearance-based object recognition using svms: Which kernel should I use. In: Proc of NIPS workshop on statistical methods for computational experiments in visual processing and computer vision, Red Hook, NY, USA
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Guyon I, Weston J, Barnhill S, Vapnik V (2002) Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines. Machine learning 46(1-3):389–422
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Shipp MA, Ross KN, Tamayo P, Weng AP, Kutok JL, Aguiar RC, Gaasenbeek M, Angelo M, Reich M, Pinkus GS, et al. (2002) Diffuse large b-cell lymphoma outcome prediction by gene-expression profiling and supervised machine learning. Nature medicine 8(1):68–74
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fukumizu K, Bach FR, Jordan MI (2004) Dimensionality reduction for supervised learning with reproducing kernel hilbert spaces. Journal of Machine Learning Research 5(Jan):73–99
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Hein M, Bousquet O (2004) Kernels, Associated Structures and Generalizations, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Cohen SB, Ruppin E, Dror G (2005) Feature selection based on the shapley value. In: Kaelbling LP, Saffiotti A (eds) IJCAI-05, Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, July 30 - August 5, 2005, Professional Book Center, pp 665–670
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Gretton A, Bousquet O, Smola A, Schölkopf B (2005) Measuring statistical dependence with hilbert-schmidt norms. In: International conference on algorithmic learning theory, Springer, pp 63–77
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bair E, Hastie T, Paul D, Tibshirani R (2006) Prediction by supervised principal components. Journal of the American Statistical Association 101(473):119–137
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Park MY, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2006) Averaged gene expressions for regression. Biostatistics 8(2):212–227
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Yuan M, Lin Y (2006) Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 68(1):49–67
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Hooker G (2007) Generalized functional anova diagnostics for high-dimensional functions of dependent variables. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 16(3):709–732
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Song L, Smola A, Gretton A, Borgwardt KM, Bedo J (2007) Supervised feature selection via dependence estimation. In: Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Machine learning, pp 823–830
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Chakraborty D, Pal NR (2008) Selecting useful groups of features in a connectionist framework. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 19(3):381–396
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Meier L, Van De Geer S, Bühlmann P (2008) The group lasso for logistic regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 70(1):53–71
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Strobl C, Boulesteix AL, Kneib T, Augustin T, Zeileis A (2008) Conditional variable importance for random forests. BMC bioinformatics 9:307
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Berk R, Sherman L, Barnes G, Kurtz E, Ahlman L (2009) Forecasting murder within a population of probationers and parolees: A high stakes application of statistical learning. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 172(1):191–211
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Raento M, Oulasvirta A, Eagle N (2009) Smartphones: An emerging tool for social scientists. Sociological Methods & Research 37(3):426–454
2009
Cited alongside, same era.
Witten DM, Tibshirani R, Hastie T (2009) A penalized matrix decomposition, with applications to sparse principal components and canonical correlation analysis. Biostatistics 10(3):515–534
2009
Cited alongside, same era.
Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2010) A note on the group lasso and a sparse group lasso. arXiv:10010736
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
He Z, Yu W (2010) Stable Feature Selection for Biomarker Discovery, vol 34, Computational Biology and Chemistry, pp 215–225
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
Jackson JJ, Wood D, Bogg T, Walton KE, Harms PD, Roberts BW (2010) What do conscientious people do? development and validation of the behavioral indicators of conscientiousness (bic). Journal of Research in Personality 44(4):501–511
Stachl C, Hilbert S, Au JQ, Buschek D, De Luca A, Bischl B, Hussmann H, Bühner M (2017) Personality traits predict smartphone usage. European Journal of Personality 31(6):701–722
2017
Later among the works it cites.
Yarkoni T, Westfall J (2017) Choosing prediction over explanation in psychology: Lessons from machine learning. Perspectives on Psychological Science 12(6):1100–1122
2017
Later among the works it cites.
Gregorova M, Kalousis A, Marchand-Maillet S (2018) Structured nonlinear variable selection. In: Globerson A, Silva R (eds) Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, UAI 2018, Monterey, California, USA, August 6-10, 2018, AUAI Press, pp 23–32
2018
Later among the works it cites.
Lei J, G’Sell M, Rinaldo A, Tibshirani RJ, Wasserman L (2018) Distribution-free predictive inference for regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association 113(523):1094–1111
2018
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
Meinshausen N, Bühlmann P (2010) Stability selection. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 72(4):417–473
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
Nicodemus K, Malley J, Strobl C, Ziegler A (2010) The behaviour of random forest permutation-based variable importance measures under predictor correlation. BMC Bioinformatics pp 11–110
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
Rachuri KK, Musolesi M, Mascolo C, Rentfrow PJ, Longworth C, Aucinas A (2010) Emotionsense: A mobile phones based adaptive platform for experimental social psychology research. In: UbiComp’10 - Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
Barshan E, Ghodsi A, Azimifar Z, Jahromi MZ (2011) Supervised principal component analysis: Visualization, classification and regression on subspaces and submanifolds. Pattern Recognition 44(7):1357–1371
2011
Cited alongside, same era.
Miller G (2012) The smartphone psychology manifesto. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7(3):221–237
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
Song L, Smola A, Gretton A, Bedo J, Borgwardt K (2012) Feature selection via dependence maximization. Journal of Machine Learning Research 13(May):1393–1434
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
Lipton ZC (2018) The mythos of model interpretability: In machine learning, the concept of interpretability is both important and slippery. Queue 16(3):31–57
2018
Later among the works it cites.
2018
Later among the works it cites.
Schoedel R, Au Q, Völkel ST, Lehmann F, Becker D, Bühner M, Bischl B, Hussmann H, Stachl C (2018) Digital footprints of sensation seeking. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 226(4):232–245
2018
Later among the works it cites.
Thomée S (2018) Mobile phone use and mental health. a review of the research that takes a psychological perspective on exposure. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15(12):2692
2018
Later among the works it cites.
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Casalicchio G, Molnar C, Bischl B (2019) Visualizing the Feature Importance for Black Box Models, Springer International Publishing. Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pp 655–670
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Fisher A, Rudin C, Dominici F (2019) All models are wrong, but many are useful: Learning a variable’s importance by studying an entire class of prediction models simultaneously. Journal of Machine Learning Research 20(177):1–81
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Harari GM, Müller SR, Stachl C, Wang R, Wang W, Bühner M, Rentfrow PJ, Campbell AT, Gosling SD (2019) Sensing sociability: Individual differences in young adults’ conversation, calling, texting, and app use behaviors in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Molnar C (2019) Interpretable Machine Learning. https://christophm.github.io/interpretable-ml-book/
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Schuwerk T, Kaltefleiter LJ, Au JQ, Hoesl A, Stachl C (2019) Enter the wild: Autistic traits and their relationship to mentalizing and social interaction in everyday life. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders pp 1–16
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Watson DS, Wright MN (2019) Testing Conditional Independence in Supervised Learning Algorithms. arXiv:190109917
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Covert I, Lundberg SM, Lee SI (2020) Understanding global feature contributions with additive importance measures. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33
2020
Later among the works it cites.
Schoedel R, Pargent F, Au Q, Völkel ST, Schuwerk T, Bühner M, Stachl C (2020) To challenge the morning lark and the night owl: Using smartphone sensing data to investigate day–night behaviour patterns. European Journal of Personality p per.2258
2020
Later among the works it cites.
Tripathi S, Hemachandra N, Trivedi P (2020) Interpretable feature subset selection: A shapley value based approach. In: Proceedings of 2020 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, Special Session on Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Safety Critical Systems
2020
Later among the works it cites.
Valentin S, Harkotte M, Popov T (2020) Interpreting neural decoding models using grouped model reliance. PLOS Computational Biology 16(1):e1007148
2020
Later among the works it cites.
Williamson BD, Gilbert PB, Simon NR, Carone M (2020) A unified approach for inference on algorithm-agnostic variable importance. arXiv:200403683
2020
Later among the works it cites.
Witten D, Tibshirani R (2020) PMA: Penalized Multivariate Analysis. R package version 1.2.1
2020
Later among the works it cites.
2021
Closest in time.
Brenning A (2021) Transforming feature space to interpret machine learning models. arXiv:210404295
2021
Closest in time.
Seedorff N, Brown G (2021) totalvis: A principal components approach to visualizing total effects in black box models. SN Computer Science 2(3):1–12
2021
Closest in time.