Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
We propose a method, based on matrix product states, for studying the time evolution of many-body quantum lattice systems under continuous and site-resolved measurement.
Jean Dalibard, Yvan Castin, and Klaus Mølmer, “Wave-function approach to dissipative processes in quantum optics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 68
1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
A.C. Elitzur and L. Vaidman, “Quantum mechanical interaction-free measurements,” Found. Phys. 23
1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
Heinz-Peter Breuer and Francesco Petruccione, The theory of open quantum systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002)
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Pasquale Calabrese and John Cardy, “Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory,” J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2004
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Maximilian Schlosshauer, “Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 76
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Gabriele De Chiara, Simone Montangero, Pasquale Calabrese, and Rosario Fazio, “Entanglement entropy dynamics of Heisenberg chains,” J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2006
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Kurt Jacobs and Daniel A. Steck, “A straightforward introduction to continuous quantum measurement,” Contemp. Phys. 47
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Howard M. Wiseman and Gerard J. Milburn, Quantum Measurement and Control (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK), 2009)
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ryszard Horodecki, Paweł Horodecki, Michał Horodecki, and Karol Horodecki, “Quantum entanglement,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 81
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Pasquale Calabrese and John Cardy, “Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory,” J. Phys. A 42
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Waseem S. Bakr, Jonathon I. Gillen, Amy Peng, Simon Fölling, and Markus Greiner, “A quantum gas microscope for detecting single atoms in a Hubbard-regime optical lattice,” Nature 462
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Anatoli Polkovnikov, Krishnendu Sengupta, Alessandro Silva, and Mukund Vengalattore, “Colloquium: Nonequilibrium dynamics of closed interacting quantum systems,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 83
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
U. Schollwöck, “The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states,” Ann. Phys. (N. Y.) 326
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Andrew J. Daley, “Quantum trajectories and open many-body quantum systems,” Adv. Phys. 63
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. Rotter and J. P. Bird, “A review of progress in the physics of open quantum systems: theory and experiment,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 78
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Nicolas Laflorencie, “Quantum entanglement in condensed matter systems,” Phys. Rep. 646
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Jutho Haegeman, Christian Lubich, Ivan Oseledets, Bart Vandereycken, and Frank Verstraete, “Unifying time evolution and optimization with matrix product states,” Phys. Rev. B 94
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Apoorva Patel and Parveen Kumar, “Weak measurements, quantum-state collapse, and the born rule,” Phys. Rev. A 96
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Yaodong Li, Xiao Chen, and Matthew P. A. Fisher, “Quantum Zeno effect and the many-body entanglement transition,” Phys. Rev. B 98
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Johannes Hauschild and Frank Pollmann, “Efficient numerical simulations with Tensor Networks: Tensor Network Python (TeNPy),” SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , 5 (2018) , code available from https://github.com/tenpy/tenpy
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Frank Arute et al
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Amos Chan, Rahul M. Nandkishore, Michael Pretko, and Graeme Smith, “Unitary-projective entanglement dynamics,” Phys. Rev. B 99
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Brian Skinner, Jonathan Ruhman, and Adam Nahum, “Measurement-induced phase transitions in the dynamics of entanglement,” Phys. Rev. X 9
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Yaodong Li, Xiao Chen, and Matthew P. A. Fisher, “Measurement-driven entanglement transition in hybrid quantum circuits,” Phys. Rev. B 100
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Szyniszewski, A. Romito, and H. Schomerus, “Entanglement transition from variable-strength weak measurements,” Phys. Rev. B 100
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Xiangyu Cao, Antoine Tilloy, and Andrea De Luca, “Entanglement in a fermion chain under continuous monitoring,” SciPost Phys. 7
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Sebastian Paeckel, Thomas Köhler, Andreas Swoboda, Salvatore R. Manmana, Ulrich Schollwöck, and Claudius Hubig, “Time-evolution methods for matrix-product states,” Ann. Phys. (N. Y.) 411
2019
Elmer V. H. Doggen, Igor V. Gornyi, Alexander D. Mirlin, and Dmitry G. Polyakov, “Slow many-body delocalization beyond one dimension,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125
2020
Later among the works it cites.
Kyrylo Snizhko, Parveen Kumar, and Alessandro Romito, “Quantum Zeno effect appears in stages,” Phys. Rev. Research 2
2020
Later among the works it cites.
Ruihua Fan, Sagar Vijay, Ashvin Vishwanath, and Yi-Zhuang You, “Self-organized error correction in random unitary circuits with measurement,” Phys. Rev. B 103
2021
Closest in time.
Shengqi Sang and Timothy H. Hsieh, “Measurement-protected quantum phases,” Phys. Rev. Research 3
2021
Closest in time.
Matteo Ippoliti, Michael J. Gullans, Sarang Gopalakrishnan, David A. Huse, and Vedika Khemani, “Entanglement phase transitions in measurement-only dynamics,” Phys. Rev. X 11
2021
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
Sthitadhi Roy, J. T. Chalker, I. V. Gornyi, and Yuval Gefen, “Measurement-induced steering of quantum systems,” Phys. Rev. Research 2
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Szyniszewski, A. Romito, and H. Schomerus, “Universality of entanglement transitions from stroboscopic to continuous measurements,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Yimu Bao, Soonwon Choi, and Ehud Altman, “Theory of the phase transition in random unitary circuits with measurements,” Phys. Rev. B 101
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Soonwon Choi, Yimu Bao, Xiao-Liang Qi, and Ehud Altman, “Quantum error correction in scrambling dynamics and measurement-induced phase transition,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Xiao Chen, Yaodong Li, Matthew P. A. Fisher, and Andrew Lucas, “Emergent conformal symmetry in nonunitary random dynamics of free fermions,” Phys. Rev. Research 2
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Aidan Zabalo, Michael J. Gullans, Justin H. Wilson, Sarang Gopalakrishnan, David A. Huse, and J. H. Pixley, “Critical properties of the measurement-induced transition in random quantum circuits,” Phys. Rev. B 101
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Oliver Lunt and Arijeet Pal, “Measurement-induced entanglement transitions in many-body localized systems,” Phys. Rev. Research 2
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Lavasani, Y. Alavirad, and M. Barkeshli, “Measurement-induced topological entanglement transitions in symmetric random quantum circuits,” Nat. Phys. 17
2021
Closest in time.
Matteo Ippoliti and Vedika Khemani, “Postselection-free entanglement dynamics via spacetime duality,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126
2021
Closest in time.
Alberto Biella and Marco Schiró, “Many-Body Quantum Zeno Effect and Measurement-Induced Subradiance Transition,” Quantum 5
2021
Closest in time.
Xhek Turkeshi, Alberto Biella, Rosario Fazio, Marcello Dalmonte, and Marco Schiró, “Measurement-induced entanglement transitions in the quantum ising chain: From infinite to zero clicks,” Phys. Rev. B 103
2021
Closest in time.
O. Alberton, M. Buchhold, and S. Diehl, “Entanglement transition in a monitored free-fermion chain: From extended criticality to area law,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126
2021
Closest in time.
M. Buchhold, Y. Minoguchi, A. Altland, and S. Diehl, “Effective theory for the measurement-induced phase transition of Dirac fermions,” Phys. Rev. X 11
2021
Closest in time.
Jonathan T. Monroe, Nicole Yunger Halpern, Taeho Lee, and Kater W. Murch, “Weak measurement of a superconducting qubit reconciles incompatible operators,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126
2021
Closest in time.
2021
Closest in time.
Mathias Van Regemortel, Ze-Pei Cian, Alireza Seif, Hossein Dehghani, and Mohammad Hafezi, “Entanglement entropy scaling transition under competing monitoring protocols,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126
2021
Closest in time.
Shengqi Sang, Yaodong Li, Tianci Zhou, Xiao Chen, Timothy H. Hsieh, and Matthew P.A. Fisher, “Entanglement negativity at measurement-induced criticality,” PRX Quantum 2
2021
Closest in time.
Yaodong Li and Matthew P. A. Fisher, “Statistical mechanics of quantum error correcting codes,” Phys. Rev. B 103
2021
Closest in time.
Yimu Bao, Soonwon Choi, and Ehud Altman, “Symmetry enriched phases of quantum circuits,” Annals of Physics 435
2021
Closest in time.
Shao-Kai Jian, Chunxiao Liu, Xiao Chen, Brian Swingle, and Pengfei Zhang, “Measurement-induced phase transition in the monitored Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127
2021
Closest in time.
Sarang Gopalakrishnan and Michael J. Gullans, “Entanglement and purification transitions in non-hermitian quantum mechanics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126
2021
Closest in time.
Elmer V. H. Doggen, Igor V. Gornyi, and Dmitry G. Polyakov, “Stark many-body localization: Evidence for Hilbert-space shattering,” Phys. Rev. B 103
2021
Closest in time.
Takaaki Minato, Koudai Sugimoto, Tomotaka Kuwahara, and Keiji Saito, “Fate of measurement-induced phase transition in long-range interactions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128
2022
Closest in time.
Hirsh Kamakari, Shi-Ning Sun, Mario Motta, and Austin J. Minnich, “Digital quantum simulation of open quantum systems using quantum imaginary–time evolution,” PRX Quantum 3
2022
Closest in time.