Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Many technical approaches have been proposed for ensuring that decisions made by machine learning systems are fair, but few of these proposals have been stress-tested in real-world systems.
Fair inference on outcomes. In Proceedings of the… AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , Vol. 2018. NIH Public Access, 1931
Razieh Nabi and Ilya Shpitser. 2018 · 1931
Earlier work this paper cites.
Racial bias in bail decisions
David Arnold, Will Dobbie, and Crystal S Yang. 2018 · 1932
Earlier work this paper cites.
Signal detection theory and psychophysics . Vol. 1
David Marvin Green, John A Swets, et al · 1966
Earlier work this paper cites.
Value-sensitive design
Batya Friedman. 1996 · 1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
Racial bias in motor vehicle searches: Theory and evidence
John Knowles, Nicola Persico, and Petra Todd. 2001 · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
How computer systems embody values
Helen Nissenbaum. 2001 · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Sovereign virtue: The theory and practice of equality
Ronald Dworkin. 2002 · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Detection and selection decisions in the practice of screening mammography
Thomas R Stewart and Jeryl L Mumpower. 2004 · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Conflict and criterion setting in recognition memory
Tim Curran, Casey DeBuse, and P. Leynes. 2007 · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
The economics of discrimination
Gary S Becker. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fairness-aware Learning through Regularization Approach
Toshihiro Kamishima, Shotaro Akaho, and Jun Sakuma. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisions
Ian Krajbich and Antonio Rangel. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
A signal detection theory analysis of racial and ethnic disproportionality in the referral and substantiation process of the US child welfare services system
Jeryl L Mumpower and Gary H McClelland. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Certifying and removing disparate impact. In proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining . 259–268
Michael Feldman, Sorelle A Friedler, John Moeller, Carlos Scheidegger, and Suresh Venkatasubramanian. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. In Advances in neural information processing systems . 3315–3323
Moritz Hardt, Eric Price, and Nati Srebro. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Inherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores
Jon Kleinberg, Sendhil Mullainathan, and Manish Raghavan. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Generalized Social Marginal Welfare Weights for Optimal Tax Theory
Emmanuel Saez and Stefanie Stantcheva. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairness. In Proceedings of the 23rd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining . 797–806
Sam Corbett-Davies, Emma Pierson, Avi Feller, Sharad Goel, and Aziz Huq. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Avoiding discrimination through causal reasoning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems . 656–666
Niki Kilbertus, Mateo Rojas Carulla, Giambattista Parascandolo, Moritz Hardt, Dominik Janzing, and Bernhard Schölkopf. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Counterfactual fairness. In Advances in neural information processing systems . 4066–4076
Matt J Kusner, Joshua Loftus, Chris Russell, and Ricardo Silva. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
The problem of infra-marginality in outcome tests for discrimination
Camelia Simoiu, Sam Corbett-Davies, Sharad Goel, et al · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatment. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web (Perth, Australia) (WWW ’17) . International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, CHE, 1171–1180
Muhammad Bilal Zafar, Isabel Valera, Manuel Gomez Rodriguez, and Krishna P. Gummadi. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
A reductions approach to fair classification
Alekh Agarwal, Alina Beygelzimer, Miroslav Dudík, John Langford, and Hanna Wallach. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Rachel KE Bellamy, Kuntal Dey, Michael Hind, Samuel C Hoffman, Stephanie Houde, Kalapriya Kannan, Pranay Lohia, Jacquelyn Martino, Sameep Mehta, Aleksandra Mojsilovic, et al · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Fairness in criminal justice risk assessments: The state of the art
Richard Berk, Hoda Heidari, Shahin Jabbari, Michael Kearns, and Aaron Roth. 2018 · 2018
Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–16
Kenneth Holstein, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hal Daumé III, Miro Dudik, and Hanna Wallach. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Abigail Z Jacobs and Hanna Wallach. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
An algorithm for removing sensitive information: application to race-independent recidivism prediction
James E Johndrow, Kristian Lum, et al · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Millions of black people affected by racial bias in health-care algorithms
Heidi Ledford. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Model cards for model reporting. In Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency . 220–229
Margaret Mitchell, Simone Wu, Andrew Zaldivar, Parker Barnes, Lucy Vasserman, Ben Hutchinson, Elena Spitzer, Inioluwa Deborah Raji, and Timnit Gebru. 2019 · 2019
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
Help wanted: An exploration of hiring algorithms, equity and bias
Miranda Bogen and Rieke Aaron. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency . 77–91
Joy Buolamwini and Timnit Gebru. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
The measure and mismeasure of fairness: A critical review of fair machine learning
Sam Corbett-Davies and Sharad Goel. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Measuring and mitigating unintended bias in text classification. In Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society . 67–73
Lucas Dixon, John Li, Jeffrey Sorensen, Nithum Thain, and Lucy Vasserman. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Timnit Gebru, Jamie Morgenstern, Briana Vecchione, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hanna Wallach, Hal Daumé III, and Kate Crawford. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
A short-term intervention for long-term fairness in the labor market. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference . 1389–1398
Lily Hu and Yiling Chen. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Algorithmic fairness. In Aea papers and proceedings , Vol. 108. 22–27
Jon Kleinberg, Jens Ludwig, Sendhil Mullainathan, and Ashesh Rambachan. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Delayed impact of fair machine learning
Lydia T Liu, Sarah Dean, Esther Rolf, Max Simchowitz, and Moritz Hardt. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Later among the works it cites.
Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm that guides health decisions for 70 million people. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency . 89–89
Ziad Obermeyer and Sendhil Mullainathan. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Problem Formulation and Fairness. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Atlanta, GA, USA) (FAT* ’19) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 39–48
Samir Passi and Solon Barocas. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Creating Fair Models of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk. In Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (Honolulu, HI, USA) (AIES ’19) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 271–278
Stephen Pfohl, Ben Marafino, Adrien Coulet, Fatima Rodriguez, Latha Palaniappan, and Nigam H. Shah. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Fairness and abstraction in sociotechnical systems. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency . 59–68
Andrew D Selbst, Danah Boyd, Sorelle A Friedler, Suresh Venkatasubramanian, and Janet Vertesi. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Fairness without Harm: Decoupled Classifiers with Preference Guarantees (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 97) , Kamalika Chaudhuri and Ruslan Salakhutdinov (Eds.). PMLR, Long Beach, California, USA, 6373–6382
Berk Ustun, Yang Liu, and David Parkes. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Fairlearn: A toolkit for assessing and improving fairness in AI
Sarah Bird, Miro Dudík, Richard Edgar, Brandon Horn, Roman Lutz, Vanessa Milan, Mehrnoosh Sameki, Hanna Wallach, and Kathleen Walker. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Awareness in Practice: Tensions in Access to Sensitive Attribute Data for Antidiscrimination. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Barcelona, Spain) (FAT* ’20) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 492–500
Miranda Bogen, Aaron Rieke, and Shazeda Ahmed. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Individual Fairness in Pipelines
Cynthia Dwork, Christina Ilvento, and Meena Jagadeesan. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Fairness Evaluation in Presence of Biased Noisy Labels
Riccardo Fogliato, Max G’Sell, and Alexandra Chouldechova. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Fair classification and social welfare. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency . 535–545
Lily Hu and Yiling Chen. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Fairness, equality, and power in algorithmic decision making
Maximilian Kasy and Rediet Abebe. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Mitigating bias in algorithmic hiring: Evaluating claims and practices. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency . 469–481
Manish Raghavan, Solon Barocas, Jon Kleinberg, and Karen Levy. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Closing the AI accountability gap: defining an end-to-end framework for internal algorithmic auditing. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency . 33–44
Inioluwa Deborah Raji, Andrew Smart, Rebecca N White, Margaret Mitchell, Timnit Gebru, Ben Hutchinson, Jamila Smith-Loud, Daniel Theron, and Parker Barnes. 2020b · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
What does it mean to’solve’the problem of discrimination in hiring? social, technical and legal perspectives from the UK on automated hiring systems. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency . 458–468
Javier Sánchez-Monedero, Lina Dencik, and Lilian Edwards. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
The What-If Tool: Interactive Probing of Machine Learning Models
J. Wexler, M. Pushkarna, T. Bolukbasi, M. Wattenberg, F. Viégas, and J. Wilson. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.