Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
The societal and ethical implications of the use of opaque artificial intelligence systems for consequential decisions, such as welfare allocation and criminal justice, have generated a lively debate among multiple stakeholder groups, including computer scientists, ethicists, social scientists, policy makers, and end users.
H. Reichenbach, On probability and induction, Philosophy of Science 5 (1) (1938) 21–45
1938
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. G. Hempel, P. Oppenheim, Studies in the logic of explanation, Philosophy of Science 15 (2) (1948) 135–175
1948
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Rudner, The scientist qua scientist makes value judgments, Philosophy of science 20 (1) (1953) 1–6
1953
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. E. Meehl, Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence., University of Minnesota Press, 1954
1954
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Kim, C. Rudin, J. A. Shah, The bayesian case model: A generative approach for case-based reasoning and prototype classification, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2014, pp. 1952–1960
1960
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Dewey, The quest for certainty, 3rd Edition, New York: Capricorn Books, 1960
1960
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. Levi, Must the scientist make value judgments?, The Journal of Philosophy 57 (11) (1960) 345–357
1960
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. G. Hempel, Aspects of Scientific Explanation; And Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, New York, Free Press, 1965
1965
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. C. Salmon, Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world, Princeton University Press, 1984
1984
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Kleinmuntz, Clinical and actuarial judgment, Science 247 (4939) (1990) 146–146
1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. L. Dreyfus, L. Hubert, et al., What computers still can’t do: A critique of artificial reason, MIT press, 1992
1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. R. Swartout, J. D. Moore, Explanation in second generation expert systems, in: Second generation expert systems, Springer, 1993, pp. 543–585
1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. L. Smith, S. A. Kane, The law of large numbers and the strength of insurance, in: Insurance, risk management, and public policy, Springer, 1994, pp. 1–27
1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. E. Longino, Cognitive and non-cognitive values in science: Rethinking the dichotomy, in: Feminism, science, and the philosophy of science, Springer, 1996, pp. 39–58
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. H. Wolpert, The lack of a priori distinctions between learning algorithms, Neural computation 8 (7) (1996) 1341–1390
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. H. Wolpert, W. G. Macready, No free lunch theorems for optimization, IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation 1 (1) (1997) 67–82
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Pearl, Causality: models, reasoning and inference, Vol. 29, Springer, 2000
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Douglas, Inductive risk and values in science, Philosophy of science 67 (4) (2000) 559–579
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. W. Batterman, The devil in the details: Asymptotic reasoning in explanation, reduction, and emergence, Oxford University Press, 2001
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. D. Gottfreson, L. J. Moriarty, Clinical versus actuarial judgments in criminal justice decisions: Should one replace the other, Fed. Probation 70 (2006) 15
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Fox, D. Glasspool, D. Grecu, S. Modgil, M. South, V. Patkar, Argumentation-based inference and decision making–a medical perspective, IEEE intelligent systems 22 (6) (2007) 34–41
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Potochnik, Optimality modeling and explanatory generality, Philosophy of Science 74 (5) (2007) 680–691
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Pincock, A role for mathematics in the physical sciences, Noûs 41 (2) (2007) 253–275
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Strevens, Depth: An account of scientific explanation, Harvard University Press, 2008
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Erhan, Y. Bengio, A. Courville, P. Vincent, Visualizing higher-layer features of a deep network, University of Montreal 1341 (3) (2009) 1
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Bokulich, How scientific models can explain, Synthese 180 (1) (2011) 33–45
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, G. E. Hinton, Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks, in: Advances in neural information processing systems, 2012, pp. 1097–1105
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. A. Berk, J. Bleich, Statistical procedures for forecasting criminal behavior: A comparative assessment, Criminology & Pub. Pol’y 12 (2013) 513
2013
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Lange, Really statistical explanations and genetic drift, Philosophy of Science 80 (2) (2013) 169–188
2013
Cited alongside, same era.
D. Steel, Acceptance, values, and inductive risk, Philosophy of Science 80 (5) (2013) 818–828
2013
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Y. Chen, K. Procci, M. Boyce, J. Wright, A. Garcia, M. Barnes, Situation awareness-based agent transparency, Tech. rep., Army research lab aberdeen proving ground md human research and engineering (2014)
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
R. W. Batterman, C. C. Rice, Minimal model explanations, Philosophy of Science 81 (3) (2014) 349–376
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Sabour, N. Frosst, G. E. Hinton, Dynamic routing between capsules, in: Advances in neural information processing systems, 2017, pp. 3856–3866
2017
Later among the works it cites.
M. Chirimuuta, Explanation in computational neuroscience: Causal and non-causal, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69 (3) (2017) 849–880
2017
Later among the works it cites.
K. C. Elliott, D. Steel, Current controversies in values and science, Taylor & Francis, 2017
2017
Later among the works it cites.
M. Veale, L. Edwards, Clarity, surprises, and further questions in the article 29 working party draft guidance on automated decision-making and profiling, Computer Law & Security Review 34 (2) (2018) 398–404
2018
Later among the works it cites.
A. Adadi, M. Berrada, Peeking inside the black-box: A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), IEEE Access 6 (2018) 52138–52160
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
B. Kim, Interactive and interpretable machine learning models for human machine collaboration, Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2015)
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Goldstein, A. Kapelner, J. Bleich, E. Pitkin, Peeking inside the black box: Visualizing statistical learning with plots of individual conditional expectation, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 24 (1) (2015) 44–65
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
B. Letham, C. Rudin, T. H. McCormick, D. Madigan, et al., Interpretable classifiers using rules and bayesian analysis: Building a better stroke prediction model, The Annals of Applied Statistics 9 (3) (2015) 1350–1371
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, G. Hinton, Deep learning, Nature 521 (7553) (2015) 436
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
C. Rice, Moving beyond causes: Optimality models and scientific explanation, Noûs 49 (3) (2015) 589–615
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Angwin, J. Larson, S. Mattu, L. Kirchner, Machine bias: there’s software used across the country to predict future criminals, and it’s biased against blacks. Propublica 2016 (2016)
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
M. T. Ribeiro, S. Singh, C. Guestrin, Why should i trust you?: Explaining the predictions of any classifier, in: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, ACM, 2016, pp. 1135–1144
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
2018
Later among the works it cites.
R. Binns, M. Van Kleek, M. Veale, U. Lyngs, J. Zhao, N. Shadbolt, ’it’s reducing a human being to a percentage’ perceptions of justice in algorithmic decisions, in: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2018, pp. 1–14
2018
Later among the works it cites.
B. Lepri, N. Oliver, E. Letouzé, A. Pentland, P. Vinck, Fair, transparent, and accountable algorithmic decision-making processes, Philosophy & Technology 31 (4) (2018) 611–627
2018
Later among the works it cites.
R. R. Hoffman, G. Klein, S. T. Mueller, Explaining explanation for “explainable ai”, in: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 62, SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 2018, pp. 197–201
2018
Later among the works it cites.
R. Guidotti, A. Monreale, S. Ruggieri, F. Turini, F. Giannotti, D. Pedreschi, A survey of methods for explaining black box models, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 51 (5) (2018) 1–42
2018
Later among the works it cites.
B. Kim, M. Wattenberg, J. Gilmer, C. Cai, J. Wexler, F. Viegas, R. Sayres, Interpretability beyond feature attribution: Quantitative testing with concept activation vectors (tcav), in: International Conference on Machine Learning, 2018, pp. 2673–2682
2018
Later among the works it cites.
O. Li, H. Liu, C. Chen, C. Rudin, Deep learning for case-based reasoning through prototypes: A neural network that explains its predictions, in: Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2018, pp. 3530–3537
2018
Later among the works it cites.
A. Reutlinger, J. Saatsi, Explanation beyond causation: philosophical perspectives on non-causal explanations, Oxford University Press, 2018
2018
Later among the works it cites.
T. Miller, Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences, Artificial Intelligence 267 (2019) 1–38
2019
Later among the works it cites.
J. Zerilli, A. Knott, J. Maclaurin, C. Gavaghan, Transparency in algorithmic and human decision-making: is there a double standard?, Philosophy & Technology 32 (4) (2019) 661–683
2019
Later among the works it cites.
C. Zednik, Solving the black box problem: A normative framework for explainable artificial intelligence, Philosophy & Technology (2019) 1–24
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Q. Zhao, T. Hastie, Causal interpretations of black-box models, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics (2019) 1–19
2019
Later among the works it cites.
A. Kosiorek, S. Sabour, Y. W. Teh, G. E. Hinton, Stacked capsule autoencoders, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2019, pp. 15486–15496
2019
Later among the works it cites.
B. Mittelstadt, C. Russell, S. Wachter, Explaining explanations in ai, in: Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, ACM, 2019, pp. 279–288
2019
Later among the works it cites.
P. Johnston, R. Harris, The boeing 737 max saga: lessons for software organizations, Software Quality Professional 21 (3) (2019) 4–12
2019
Later among the works it cites.
S. Mau, The metric society: On the quantification of the social, John Wiley & Sons, 2019
2019
Later among the works it cites.
B. C. Smith, The promise of Artificial Intelligence, MIT University Press, 2019
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Z. Obermeyer, B. Powers, C. Vogeli, S. Mullainathan, Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations, Science 366 (6464) (2019) 447–453
2019
Later among the works it cites.
A. Olteanu, C. Castillo, F. Diaz, E. Kiciman, Social data: Biases, methodological pitfalls, and ethical boundaries, Frontiers in Big Data 2 (2019) 13
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Y. Zhang, Q. V. Liao, R. K. Bellamy, Effect of confidence and explanation on accuracy and trust calibration in ai-assisted decision making, in: Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 2020, p. 295–305
2020
Later among the works it cites.
P. Menzies, H. Beebee, Counterfactual Theories of Causation, in: E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, summer 2020 Edition, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2020
2020
Later among the works it cites.
J. Kemper, D. Kolkman, Transparent to whom? no algorithmic accountability without a critical audience, Information, Communication & Society 22 (14) (2019) 2081–2096
2096
Closest in time.