Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
The Shapley value has become popular in the Explainable AI (XAI) literature, thanks, to a large extent, to a solid theoretical foundation, including four "favourable and fair" axioms for attribution in transferable utility games.
1909
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. S. Shapley, “A value for n-person games,” in Contributions to the Theory of Games (AM-28), Volume II , 1953
1953
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. W. Tukey, “The future of data analysis,” The annals of mathematical statistics , vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1–67, 1962
1962
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. H. Lindeman, “Introduction to bivariate and multivariate analysis,” Tech. Rep., 1980
1980
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. B. Myerson, “Conference structures and fair allocation rules,” International Journal of Game Theory , vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 169–182, Sep 1980. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01781371
1980
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. Kruskal, “Relative importance by averaging over orderings,” The American Statistician , vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 6–10, 1987
1987
Earlier work this paper cites.
——, “Correction to “relative importance by averaging over orderings,”,” The American Statistician , vol. 41, p. 341, 1987
1987
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Hart and A. Mas-Colell, “Potential, Value, and Consistency,” Econometrica , vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 589–614, May 1989
1989
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Roth and L. S. Shapley, “The Shapley value : essays in honor of lloyd s. Shapley,” Economica , vol. 101, p. 123, 1991
1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. V. Budescu, “Dominance analysis: a new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression.” Psychological bulletin , vol. 114, no. 3, p. 542, 1993
1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Lipovetsky and M. Conklin, “Analysis of regression in game theory approach,” Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry , vol. 17, pp. 319 – 330, 10 2001
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Keinan, C. C. Hilgetag, I. Meilijson, and E. Ruppin, “Fair attribution of functional contribution in artificial and biological networks,” Neural Computation , vol. 16, pp. 1887–1915, 2003
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
——, “Feature selection based on the Shapley value,” in Proceedings of IJCAI , 2005, pp. 1–6
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Diaconis, “Theories of data analysis: From magical thinking through classical statistics,” Exploring data tables, trends, and shapes , pp. 1–36, 2006
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
O. Israeli, “A Shapley-based decomposition of the r-square of a linear regression,” Journal of Economic Inequality , vol. 5, pp. 199–212, 02 2007
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Cohen, G. Dror, and E. Ruppin, “Feature selection via coalitional game theory,” Neural Computation , vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1939–1961, 2007
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Yin, P. Tino, E. Corchado, W. Byrne, and X. Yao, “Intelligent data engineering and automated learning - ideal 2007,” 8th International Conference, Birmingham, UK, December 16-19, 2007, Proceedings , 01 2007
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Claeskens, N. L. Hjort et al. , Model selection and model averaging . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
U. Grömping, “Variable importance assessment in regression: Linear regression versus random forest,” The American Statistician , vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 308–319, 2009. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1198/tast.2009.08199
2009
Cited alongside, same era.
U. Grömping and S. Landau, “Do not adjust coefficients in shapley value regression,” Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry , vol. 26, pp. 194 – 202, 03 2010
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
——, “An efficient explanation of individual classifications using game theory,” Journal of Machine Learning Research , vol. 11, pp. 1–18, 01 2010
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Gilles. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 01 2010, vol. 44
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
G. Chalkiadakis, E. Elkind, and M. Wooldridge, “Computational aspects of cooperative game theory,” in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6682 , vol. 5, 10 2011
D. V. Fryer, I. Strümke, and H. D. Nguyen, “Shapley value confidence intervals for attributing variance explained,” Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics , vol. 6, p. 58, 2020
2020
Later among the works it cites.
K. Aas, M. Jullum, and A. Løland, “Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley values,” 2020
2020
Later among the works it cites.
A. Redelmeier, M. Jullum, and K. Aas, “Explaining predictive models with mixed features using Shapley values and conditional inference trees,” 2020
2020
Later among the works it cites.
I. Covert, S. Lundberg, and S.-I. Lee, “Explaining by removing: A unified framework for model explanation,” 2020
2020
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2011
Cited alongside, same era.
F. Huettner and M. Sunder, “Axiomatic arguments for decomposing goodness of fit according to Shapley and Owen values,” Electronic Journal of Statistics , vol. 6, no. none, pp. 1239 – 1250, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1214/12-EJS710
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
E. Strumbelj and I. Kononenko, “Explaining prediction models and individual predictions with feature contributions,” Knowledge and Information Systems , vol. 41, pp. 647–665, 12 2013
2013
Cited alongside, same era.
A. B. Owen, “Sobol’ indices and Shapley value,” SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification , vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 245–251, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1137/130936233
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
G. Chandrashekar and F. Sahin, “A survey on feature selection methods,” Computers & Electrical Engineering , vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 16–28, 2014, 40th-year commemorative issue. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045790613003066
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
E. Song, B. Nelson, and J. Staum, “Shapley effects for global sensitivity analysis: Theory and computation,” SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification , vol. 4, pp. 1060–1083, 01 2016
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
A. B. Owen and C. Prieur, “On Shapley value for measuring importance of dependent inputs,” 2017
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
S. M. Lundberg and S.-I. Lee, “A unified approach to interpreting model predictions,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , I. Guyon, U. V. Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Garnett, Eds., vol. 30. Curran Associates, Inc., 2017. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/file/8a20a8621978632d76c43dfd28b67767-Paper.pdf
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
2020
Later among the works it cites.
C. Frye, C. Rowat, and I. Feige, “Asymmetric Shapley values: incorporating causal knowledge into model-agnostic explainability,” 2020
2020
Later among the works it cites.
I. E. Kumar, S. Venkatasubramanian, C. Scheidegger, and S. Friedler, “Problems with shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measures,” 2020
2020
Later among the works it cites.
M. Sundararajan and A. Najmi, “The many Shapley values for model explanation,” 2020
2020
Later among the works it cites.
C. Chu and D. Chan, “Feature selection using approximated high-order interaction components of the Shapley value for boosted tree classifier,” IEEE Access , vol. PP, pp. 1–1, 06 2020
2020
Later among the works it cites.
S. Tripathi, N. Hemachandra, and P. Trivedi, “On feature interactions identified by Shapley values of binary classification games,” 2020
2020
Later among the works it cites.
——, “Interpretable feature subset selection: A Shapley value based approach,” Proceedings of 2020 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, Special Session on Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Safety Critical Systems , 2020
2020
Later among the works it cites.
R. Guha, A. Kha, P. Singh, and R. Sarkar, “Cga: A new feature selection model for visual human action recognition,” Neural Computing and Applications , 05 2020
2020
Later among the works it cites.
W. Estécio Marcílio Júnior and D. Eler, “From explanations to feature selection: assessing SHAP values as feature selection mechanism,” in 2020 33rd SIBGRAPI Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images (SIBGRAPI) , 11 2020
2020
Later among the works it cites.
I. Covert, S. Lundberg, and S.-I. Lee, “Understanding global feature contributions with additive importance measures,” 2020
2020
Later among the works it cites.
S. Ma and R. Tourani, “Predictive and causal implications of using shapley value for model interpretation,” 2020
2020
Later among the works it cites.
Y. Kwon, M. A. Rivas, and J. Zou, “Efficient computation and analysis of distributional Shapley values,” 2021
2021
Closest in time.
N. Moehle, S. Boyd, and A. Ang, “Portfolio performance attribution via Shapley value,” 2021
2021
Closest in time.
N. Jothi, W. Husain, and N. A. Rashid, “Predicting generalized anxiety disorder among women using Shapley value,” Journal of Infection and Public Health , vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 103–108, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876034120304019
2021
Closest in time.