Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Given the increasingly prominent role NLP models (will) play in our lives, it is important for human expectations of model behavior to align with actual model behavior.
Well-read students learn better: The impact of student initialization on knowledge distillation
Iulia Turc, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019 · 1908
Earlier work this paper cites.
On the “probable error” of a coefficient of correlation deduced from a small sample
Ronald Aylmer Fisher. 1921 · 1921
Earlier work this paper cites.
Long short-term memory
Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997 · 1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
Gagan Bansal, Besmira Nushi, Ece Kamar, Eric Horvitz, and Daniel S Weld. 2020a · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Does the whole exceed its parts? the effect of AI explanations on complementary team performance
Gagan Bansal, Tongshuang Wu, Joyce Zhou, Raymond Fok, Besmira Nushi, Ece Kamar, Marco Túlio Ribeiro, and Daniel S. Weld. 2020b · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
The PASCAL recognising textual entailment challenge
Ido Dagan, Oren Glickman, and Bernardo Magnini. 2006 · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Aligning faithful interpretations with their social attribution
Alon Jacovi and Yoav Goldberg. 2020 · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Natural Language Processing with Python
Steven Bird, Edward Loper, and Ewan Klein. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
XTE: Explainable text entailment
Vivian S Silva, André Freitas, and Siegfried Handschuh. 2020 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
LIREx: Augmenting language inference with relevant explanation
Xinyan Zhao and V. G. Vinod Vydiswaran. 2020 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inference
Samuel R. Bowman, Gabor Angeli, Christopher Potts, and Christopher D. Manning. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Research priorities for robust and beneficial artificial intelligence
Stuart Russell, Daniel Dewey, and Max Tegmark. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Human attention in visual question answering: Do humans and deep networks look at the same regions?
Abhishek Das, Harsh Agrawal, Larry Zitnick, Devi Parikh, and Dhruv Batra. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
“Why should I trust you?”: Explaining the predictions of any classifier
Marco Túlio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Supervised learning of universal sentence representations from natural language inference data
Alexis Conneau, Douwe Kiela, Holger Schwenk, Loïc Barrault, and Antoine Bordes. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
A unified approach to interpreting model predictions
Scott M. Lundberg and Su-In Lee. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Shortcut-stacked sentence encoders for multi-domain inference
Yixin Nie and Mohit Bansal. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Axiomatic attribution for deep networks
Mukund Sundararajan, Ankur Taly, and Qiqi Yan. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
e-SNLI: Natural language inference with natural language explanations
Oana-Maria Camburu, Tim Rocktäschel, Thomas Lukasiewicz, and Phil Blunsom. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Annotation artifacts in natural language inference data
Suchin Gururangan, Swabha Swayamdipta, Omer Levy, Roy Schwartz, Samuel Bowman, and Noah A. Smith. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
The mythos of model interpretability
Zachary C Lipton. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Hypothesis only baselines in natural language inference
Adam Poliak, Jason Naradowsky, Aparajita Haldar, Rachel Rudinger, and Benjamin Van Durme. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Are red roses red? evaluating consistency of question-answering models
Marco Túlio Ribeiro, Carlos Guestrin, and Sameer Singh. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
The FEVER2.0 shared task
James Thorne, Andreas Vlachos, Oana Cocarascu, Christos Christodoulopoulos, and Arpit Mittal. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Universal adversarial triggers for attacking and analyzing NLP
Eric Wallace, Shi Feng, Nikhil Kandpal, Matt Gardner, and Sameer Singh. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Attention is not not explanation
Sarah Wiegreffe and Yuval Pinter. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Understanding the effect of accuracy on trust in machine learning models
Ming Yin, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, and Hanna Wallach. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
ELECTRA: pre-training text encoders as discriminators rather than generators
Kevin Clark, Minh-Thang Luong, Quoc V. Le, and Christopher D. Manning. 2020 · 2020
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Semantically equivalent adversarial rules for debugging NLP models
Marco Túlio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Performance impact caused by hidden bias of training data for recognizing textual entailment
Masatoshi Tsuchiya. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
A broad-coverage challenge corpus for sentence understanding through inference
Adina Williams, Nikita Nangia, and Samuel Bowman. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Can I trust the explainer? verifying post-hoc explanatory methods
Oana-Maria Camburu, Eleonora Giunchiglia, Jakob Foerster, Thomas Lukasiewicz, and Phil Blunsom. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding
Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Interpretation of neural networks is fragile
Amirata Ghorbani, Abubakar Abid, and James Zou. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Closest in time.
Evaluating explainable AI: Which algorithmic explanations help users predict model behavior?
Peter Hase and Mohit Bansal. 2020 · 2020
Closest in time.
XplaiNLI: Explainable natural language inference through visual analytics
Aikaterini-Lida Kalouli, Rita Sevastjanova, Valeria de Paiva, Richard Crouch, and Mennatallah El-Assady. 2020 · 2020
Closest in time.
Adversarial NLI: A new benchmark for natural language understanding
Yixin Nie, Adina Williams, Emily Dinan, Mohit Bansal, Jason Weston, and Douwe Kiela. 2020 · 2020
Closest in time.
Reducing non-normative text generation from language models
Xiangyu Peng, Siyan Li, Spencer Frazier, and Mark Riedl. 2020 · 2020
Closest in time.
Squinting at VQA models: Introspecting VQA models with sub-questions
Ramprasaath R. Selvaraju, Purva Tendulkar, Devi Parikh, Eric Horvitz, Marco Túlio Ribeiro, Besmira Nushi, and Ece Kamar. 2020 · 2020
Closest in time.
Fooling LIME and SHAP: adversarial attacks on post hoc explanation methods
Dylan Slack, Sophie Hilgard, Emily Jia, Sameer Singh, and Himabindu Lakkaraju. 2020 · 2020
Closest in time.
Learning helpful inductive biases from self-supervised pretraining
Alex Warstadt, Yian Zhang, Xiaocheng Li, Haokun Liu, and Samuel R. Bowman. 2020 · 2020
Closest in time.
Effect of confidence and explanation on accuracy and trust calibration in ai-assisted decision making
Yunfeng Zhang, Q Vera Liao, and Rachel KE Bellamy. 2020 · 2020
Closest in time.
The struggles of feature-based explanations: Shapley values vs. minimal sufficient subsets
Oana-Maria Camburu, Eleonora Giunchiglia, Jakob Foerster, Thomas Lukasiewicz, and Phil Blunsom. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
Dynabench: Rethinking benchmarking in NLP
Douwe Kiela, Max Bartolo, Yixin Nie, Divyansh Kaushik, Atticus Geiger, Zhengxuan Wu, Bertie Vidgen, Grusha Prasad, Amanpreet Singh, Pratik Ringshia, Zhiyi Ma, Tristan Thrush, Sebastian Riedel, Zeerak Waseem, Pontus Stenetorp, Robin Jia, Mohit Bansal, Christopher Potts, and Adina Williams. 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.