Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
We apply machine learning methods to build a time-domain model for gravitational waveforms from binary black hole mergers, called mlgw.
R. A. Jacobs, M. I. Jordan, S. J. Nowlan, and G. E. Hinton, “Adaptive mixtures of local experts,” Neural Computation
1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Buonanno and T. Damour, “Transition from inspiral to plunge in binary black hole coalescences,” Phys. Rev
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Damour and A. Nagar, “Faithful Effective-One-Body waveforms of small-mass-ratio coalescing black-hole binaries,” Phys. Rev
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Damour and A. Nagar, “An improved analytical description of inspiralling and coalescing black-hole binaries,” Phys. Rev
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Damour and A. Nagar, “Effective One Body description of tidal effects in inspiralling compact binaries,” Phys. Rev
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Ajith, M. Boyle, D. A. Brown, S. Fairhurst, M. Hannam, I. Hinder, S. Husa, B. Krishnan, R. A. Mercer, F. Ohme, C. D. Ott, J. S. Read, L. Santamaria, and J. T. Whelan, “Data formats for numerical relativity waves,” 2011
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning series, MIT Press, 2012
K. Murphy, Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Aasi et al
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Ohme, A. B. Nielsen, D. Keppel, and A. Lundgren, “Statistical and systematic errors for gravitational-wave inspiral signals: A principal component analysis,” Physical Review D
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. H. Mroue, M. A. Scheel, B. Szilagyi, H. P. Pfeiffer, M. Boyle, et al
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Damour and A. Nagar, “A new analytic representation of the ringdown waveform of coalescing spinning black hole binaries,” Phys.Rev
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Taracchini, A. Buonanno, Y. Pan, T. Hinderer, M. Boyle, et al
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. K. Porter and J. Carré, “A hamiltonian monte–carlo method for bayesian inference of supermassive black hole binaries,” Classical and Quantum Gravity
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Veitch et al
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Schmidt, F. Ohme, and M. Hannam, “Towards models of gravitational waveforms from generic binaries: Modelling precession effects with a single effective precession parameter,” Physical Review D
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Khan, S. Husa, M. Hannam, F. Ohme, M. Pürrer, X. Jiménez Forteza, and A. Bohé, “Frequency-domain gravitational waves from nonprecessing black-hole binaries. II. A phenomenological model for the advanced detector era,” Phys. Rev
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Pürrer, “Frequency domain reduced order model of aligned-spin effective-one-body waveforms with generic mass-ratios and spins,” Phys. Rev
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Devine, Z. B. Etienne, and S. T. McWilliams, “Optimizing spinning time-domain gravitational waveforms for Advanced LIGO data analysis,” Class. Quant. Grav
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Bohé et al
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Pürrer, R. Smith, S. Field, P. Cañizares, V. Raymond, J. Gair, and M. Hannam, “Accelerating parameter estimation of gravitational waves from black hole binaries with reduced order quadratures,” in 14th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on Recent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity, Astrophysics, and Relativistic Field Theories
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
D. George and E. Huerta, “Deep Learning for Real-time Gravitational Wave Detection and Parameter Estimation with LIGO Data,” in NiPS Summer School 2017
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Babak, A. Taracchini, and A. Buonanno, “Validating the effective-one-body model of spinning, precessing binary black holes against numerical relativity,” Phys. Rev
A. J. Chua, C. R. Galley, and M. Vallisneri, “Reduced-order modeling with artificial neurons for gravitational-wave inference,” Physical Review Letters
2019
Later among the works it cites.
A. Rebei, E. Huerta, S. Wang, S. Habib, R. Haas, D. Johnson, and D. George, “Fusing numerical relativity and deep learning to detect higher-order multipole waveforms from eccentric binary black hole mergers,” Phys. Rev. D
2019
Later among the works it cites.
A. Nagar, G. Pratten, G. Riemenschneider, and R. Gamba, “A Multipolar Effective One Body Model for Non-Spinning Black Hole Binaries,” 2019
2019
Later among the works it cites.
B. P. Abbott et al
2019
Later among the works it cites.
P. Rettegno, F. Martinetti, A. Nagar, D. Bini, G. Riemenschneider, and T. Damour, “Comparing Effective One Body Hamiltonians for spin-aligned coalescing binaries,” 2019
2019
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Veitch, W. D. Pozzo, Cody, M. Pitkin, and ed1d1a8d, “johnveitch/cpnest: Minor optimisation,” July 2017
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Betancourt, “A conceptual introduction to hamiltonian monte carlo,” 2017
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
H. Gabbard, M. Williams, F. Hayes, and C. Messenger, “Matching matched filtering with deep networks for gravitational-wave astronomy,” Phys. Rev. Lett
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
D. George and E. Huerta, “Deep Learning for Real-time Gravitational Wave Detection and Parameter Estimation: Results with Advanced LIGO Data,” Phys. Lett. B
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Nagar et al
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Boyle et al
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Healy, C. O. Lousto, J. Lange, R. O’Shaughnessy, Y. Zlochower, and M. Campanelli, “Second RIT binary black hole simulations catalog and its application to gravitational waves parameter estimation,” Phys. Rev. D
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Later among the works it cites.
J. Healy and C. O. Lousto, “The Third RIT binary black hole simulations catalog,” 7 2020
2020
Closest in time.
A. Nagar, G. Riemenschneider, G. Pratten, P. Rettegno, and F. Messina, “A multipolar effective one body waveform model for spin-aligned black hole binaries,” 2020
2020
Closest in time.
D. Chiaramello and A. Nagar, “Faithful analytical effective-one-body waveform model for spin-aligned, moderately eccentric, coalescing black hole binaries,” Phys. Rev. D
2020
Closest in time.
S. Ossokine et al
2020
Closest in time.
G. Pratten et al
2020
Closest in time.
H. Estellés, A. Ramos-Buades, S. Husa, C. García-Quirós, M. Colleoni, L. Haegel, and R. Jaume, “IMRPhenomTP: A phenomenological time domain model for dominant quadrupole gravitational wave signal of coalescing binary black holes,” 4 2020
2020
Closest in time.
N. E. Rifat, S. E. Field, G. Khanna, and V. Varma, “Surrogate model for gravitational wave signals from comparable and large-mass-ratio black hole binaries,” Phys. Rev. D
2020
Closest in time.
S. Khan and R. Green, “Gravitational-wave surrogate models powered by artificial neural networks: The ANN-Sur for waveform generation,” 8 2020
2020
Closest in time.
R. Cotesta, S. Marsat, and M. Pürrer, “Frequency domain reduced order model of aligned-spin effective-one-body waveforms with higher-order modes,” Phys. Rev. D
2020
Closest in time.
A. Khan, E. Huerta, and A. Das, “Physics-inspired deep learning to characterize the signal manifold of quasi-circular, spinning, non-precessing binary black hole mergers,” Phys. Lett. B
2020
Closest in time.
G. Riemenschneider, P. Rettegno, and A. Nagar in preparation, 2020
2020
Closest in time.
N. Aghanim et al
2020
Closest in time.