Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Decision makers often want to target interventions so as to maximize an outcome that is observed only in the long-term.
A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe
Daniel G Horvitz and Donovan J Thompson · 1952
Earlier work this paper cites.
Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: definition and operational criteria
Ross L Prentice · 1989
Earlier work this paper cites.
Statistical validation of intermediate endpoints for chronic diseases
Laurence S Freedman, Barry I Graubard, and Arthur Schatzkin · 1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
Model Assisted Survey Sampling
CE Särndal, B Swensson, and JH Wretman · 1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
Estimation of regression coefficients when some regressors are not always observed
James M Robins, Andrea Rotnitzky, and Lue Ping Zhao · 1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
On the role of the propensity score in efficient semiparametric estimation of average treatment effects
Jinyong Hahn · 1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
Marginal mean models for dynamic regimes
Susan A Murphy, Mark J van der Laan, James M Robins, and Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
The evaluation of multiple surrogate endpoints
Jane Xu and Scott L Zeger · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies
Rajeev H Dehejia and Sadek Wahba · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Discussion on causality
Steffen L Lauritzen · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Modeling customer lifetime value
Sunil Gupta, Dominique Hanssens, Bruce Hardie, Wiliam Kahn, V Kumar, Nathaniel Lin, Nalini Ravishanker, and S Sriram · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bagging and boosting classification trees to predict churn
Aurélie Lemmens and Christophe Croux · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Defection detection: Measuring and understanding the predictive accuracy of customer churn models
Scott A Neslin, Sunil Gupta, Wagner Kamakura, Junxiang Lu, and Charlotte H Mason · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Statistical evaluation of biomarkers as surrogate endpoints: a literature review
Christopher J Weir and Rosalind J Walley · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Criteria for surrogate end points
Hua Chen, Zhi Geng, and Jinzhu Jia · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Why database marketing?
Robert C Blattberg, Byung-Do Kim, and Scott A Neslin · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Related causal frameworks for surrogate outcomes
Marshall M Joffe and Tom Greene · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Surrogate measures and consistent surrogates
Tyler J VanderWeele · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Doubly robust policy evaluation and optimization
Miroslav Dudík, Dumitru Erhan, John Langford, and Lihong Li · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Thompson sampling with the online bootstrap
Dean Eckles and Maurits Kaptein · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Stochastic models of buyer behavior
Peter S Fader, Bruce GS Hardie, and Subrata Sen · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
xgboost: Extreme gradient boosting
Tianqi Chen, Tong He, Michael Benesty, et al · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Simple probability models for computing clv and ce
Peter S Fader and Bruce GS Hardie · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Robust inference on average treatment effects with possibly more covariates than observations
Max H Farrell · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Heterogeneous treatment effects and optimal targeting policy evaluation
Günter J Hitsch and Sanjog Misra · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Reinforcement learning: An introduction
Richard S Sutton and Andrew G Barto · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Estimation and inference of heterogeneous treatment effects using random forests
Stefan Wager and Susan Athey · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Offline multi-action policy learning: Generalization and optimization
Zhengyuan Zhou, Susan Athey, and Stefan Wager · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
The surrogate index: Combining short-term proxies to estimate long-term treatment effects more rapidly and precisely
Susan Athey, Raj Chetty, Guido W Imbens, and Hyunseung Kang · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Visualizing the effects of predictor variables in black box supervised learning models
Daniel W Apley and Jingyu Zhu · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
The perils of proactive churn prevention using plan recommendations: Evidence from a field experiment
Eva Ascarza, Raghuram Iyengar, and Martin Schleicher · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects
Susan Athey and Guido Imbens · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system
Tianqi Chen and Carlos Guestrin · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Locally robust semiparametric estimation
Victor Chernozhukov, Juan Carlos Escanciano, Hidehiko Ichimura, Whitney K Newey, and James M Robins · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Principal causal effect identification and surrogate end point evaluation by multiple trials
Zhichao Jiang, Peng Ding, and Zhi Geng · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Dean Eckles and Maurits Kaptein · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
A comparison of approaches to advertising measurement: Evidence from big field experiments at Facebook
Brett R Gordon, Florian Zettelmeyer, Neha Bhargava, and Dan Chapsky · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Dynamic online pricing with incomplete information using multiarmed bandit experiments
Kanishka Misra, Eric M Schwartz, and Jacob Abernethy · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Monte Carlo Theory, Methods and Examples
Art B Owen · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Weighted linear bandits for non-stationary environments
Yoan Russac, Claire Vernade, and Olivier Cappé · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Policy learning with observational data
Susan Athey and Stefan Wager · 2020
Closest in time.
Managing churn to maximize profits
Aurélie Lemmens and Sunil Gupta · 2020
Closest in time.
Design and evaluation of personalized free trials
Hema Yoganarasimhan, Ebrahim Barzegary, and Abhishek Pani · 2020
Closest in time.
Bias and high-dimensional adjustment in observational studies of peer effects
Dean Eckles and Eytan Bakshy · 2021
Closest in time.
Proximal causal inference with hidden mediators: Front-door and related mediation problems
AmirEmad Ghassami, Ilya Shpitser, and Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen · 2021
Closest in time.
Adaptive normalization for IPW estimation
Samir Khan and Johan Ugander · 2021
Closest in time.
Treatment allocation under uncertain costs
Hao Sun, Shuyang Du, and Stefan Wager · 2021
Closest in time.