Understand
Human reading behavior is tuned to the statistics of natural language: the time it takes human subjects to read a word can be predicted from estimates of the word's probability in context.
- However, it remains an open question what computational architecture best characterizes the expectations deployed in real time by humans that determine the behavioral signatures of reading.
- Here we test over two dozen models, independently manipulating computational architecture and training dataset size, on how well their next-word expectations predict human reading time behavior on naturalistic text corpora.
- We find that across model architectures and training dataset sizes the relationship between word log-probability and reading time is (near-)linear.
Built on
Nothing clear enough to list yet.
Similar
Nothing clear enough to list yet.
Then
Nothing clear enough to list yet.
Beyond the bibliography
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…