Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Quantum matter, the research field studying phases of matter whose properties are intrinsically quantum mechanical, draws from areas as diverse as hard condensed matter physics, materials science, statistical mechanics, quantum information, quantum gravity, and large-scale numerical simulations.
Krenn M, Zeilinger A. Predicting research trends with semantic and neural networks with an application in quantum physics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2020;117(4):1910–1916
1916
Earlier work this paper cites.
Jordan P, Wigner E. Über das Paulische Äquivalenzverbot. Zeitschrift für Physik. 1928 Sep;47(9):631–651
1928
Earlier work this paper cites.
Metropolis N, Ulam S. The Monte Carlo Method. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1949 Sep;44(247):335–341. _eprint: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/01621459.1949.10483310
1949
Earlier work this paper cites.
Feynman RP, Cohen M. Energy spectrum of the excitations in liquid helium. Phys Rev. 1956 Jun;102:1189–1204. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.102.1189
1956
Earlier work this paper cites.
Frost AA, Kellogg RE, Curtis EC. Local-energy method in electronic energy calculations. Rev Mod Phys. 1960 Apr;32:313–317. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.32.313
1960
Earlier work this paper cites.
Edmonds J. Paths, Trees, and Flowers. Canadian Journal of Mathematics. 1965/ed;17:449–467
1965
Earlier work this paper cites.
Falicov LM, Kimball JC. Simple model for semiconductor-metal transitions: Sm b 6 {\mathrm{b}}_{6} and transition-metal oxides. Phys Rev Lett. 1969 May;22:997–999. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.22.997
1969
Earlier work this paper cites.
Hopfield JJ. Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1982 Apr;79(8):2554–2558
1982
Earlier work this paper cites.
Smolensky P. Information processing in dynamical systems: Foundations of harmony theory. In: Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1986. p. 194–281–
1986
Earlier work this paper cites.
Greiner W, Müller B. Quantum mechanics: Symmetries. Springer-Verlag; 1989. GREINER, WALTER//THEORETICAL PHYSICS; Available from: https://books.google.ca/books?id=PNRUAAAAYAAJ
1989
Earlier work this paper cites.
Sanders BC. Quantum dynamics of the nonlinear rotator and the effects of continual spin measurement. Phys Rev A. 1989 Sep;40:2417–2427. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.40.2417
1989
Earlier work this paper cites.
Darsey JA, Noid DW, Upadhyaya BR. Application of neural network computing to the solution for the ground-state eigenenergy of two-dimensional harmonic oscillators. Chemical Physics Letters. 1991 Feb;177(2):189–194
1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
Androsiuk J, Kulak L, Sienicki K. Neural network solution of the Schrödinger equation for a two-dimensional harmonic oscillator. Chemical Physics. 1993;173(3):377–383
1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ebeling W, Pöschel T. Entropy and long-range correlations in literary english. Europhysics Letters (EPL). 1994 may;26(4):241–246
1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ruderman DL. The statistics of natural images. Network: Computation in Neural Systems. 1994;5(4):517–548
1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
Kak SC. Quantum Neural Computing. In: Hawkes PW, editor. Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics. Vol. 94. Elsevier; 1995. p. 259–313
1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
Baeriswyl D, Campbell DK, Carmelo JMP, et al., editors. The Hubbard Model: Its Physics and Mathematical Physics. Springer US; 1995. Nato Science Series B:
1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
Georges A, Kotliar G, Krauth W, et al. Dynamical mean-field theory of strongly correlated fermion systems and the limit of infinite dimensions. Rev Mod Phys. 1996 Jan;68:13–125. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.68.13
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
Behrman EC, Niemel J, Steck JE, et al. A Quantum Dot Neural Network. Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Physics of Computation, Boston; 1996
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
Lagaris IE, Likas A, Fotiadis DI. Artificial neural network methods in quantum mechanics. Computer Physics Communications. 1997 Aug;104(1):1–14
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
Sutton RS, Barto AG. Introduction to reinforcement learning. 1st ed. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press; 1998
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fisher ME. Renormalization group theory: Its basis and formulation in statistical physics. Rev Mod Phys. 1998 Apr;70:653–681. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.70.653
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
Barkema GT, Newman MEJ. Monte carlo simulation of ice models. Phys Rev E. 1998 Jan;57:1155–1166. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.57.1155
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
Sachdev S. Quantum phase transitions. Cambridge University Press; 1999. Available from: https://books.google.ca/books?id=K_lhQgAACAAJ
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
Newman MEJ, Barkema GT. Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Physics. Oxford University Press. 1999;
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
Behrman E, Steck J, Skinner S. A spatial quantum neural computer. In: IJCNN’99. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36339); Vol. 2; Jul.; 1999. p. 874–877 vol.2
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
Sugawara M. Numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation by neural network and genetic algorithm. Computer Physics Communications. 2001 Nov;140(3):366–380
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Gottesman D, Kitaev A, Preskill J. Encoding a qubit in an oscillator. Phys Rev A. 2001 Jun;64:012310. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.64.012310
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Hinton GE. Training products of experts by minimizing contrastive divergence. Neural Computation. 2002;14(8):1771–1800. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1162/089976602760128018
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
MacKay DJC. Information theory, inference and learning algorithms. USA: Cambridge University Press; 2002
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bellman RE. Dynamic programming. USA: Dover Publications, Inc.; 2003
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Kitaev AY. Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons. Annals of Physics. 2003 Jan;303(1):2–30
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bishop CM. Pattern recognition and machine learning (information science and statistics). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2006
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
D’Alessandro D. Introduction to quantum control and dynamics. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis Ltd; 2007. Chapman and Hall/CRC Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Science; Available from: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1251242
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ghose S, Sanders BC. Non-Gaussian ancilla states for continuous variable quantum computation via Gaussian maps. Journal of Modern Optics. 2007 Apr;54(6):855–869. _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340601101575
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Perez-Garcia D, Verstraete F, Wolf MM, et al. Matrix product state representations. Quantum Info Comput. 2007 Jul;7(5):401–430
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Vidal G. Class of quantum many-body states that can be efficiently simulated. Phys Rev Lett. 2008 Sep;101:110501. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.110501
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Le Roux N, Bengio Y. Representational power of restricted boltzmann machines and deep belief networks. Neural Computation. 2008 Jun;20(6):1631–1649
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference and prediction. 2nd ed. Springer; 2009. Available from: http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~tibs/ElemStatLearn/
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bakr WS, Gillen JI, Peng A, et al. A quantum gas microscope for detecting single atoms in a Hubbard-regime optical lattice. Nature. 2009 Nov;462(7269):74–77
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Dobigeon N, Moussaoui S, Coulon M, et al. Joint bayesian endmember extraction and linear unmixing for hyperspectral imagery. Trans Sig Proc. 2009 Nov;57(11):4355–4368. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2009.2025797
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Sandvik AW. Computational Studies of Quantum Spin Systems. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2010 Nov;1297(1):135–338
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Chapelle O, Schlkopf B, Zien A. Semi-supervised learning. 1st ed. The MIT Press; 2010
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Long PM, Servedio RA. Restricted boltzmann machines are hard to approximately evaluate or simulate. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning; Madison, WI, USA. Omnipress; 2010. p. 703–710; ICML’10
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Hentschel A, Sanders BC. Machine learning for precise quantum measurement. Phys Rev Lett. 2010 Feb;104:063603. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.063603
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Cramer M, Plenio MB, Flammia ST, et al. Efficient quantum state tomography. Nature Communications. 2010 Dec;1:149
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Verstraete F, Cirac JI. Continuous matrix product states for quantum fields. Phys Rev Lett. 2010 May;104:190405. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.190405
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ronhovde P, Chakrabarty S, Hu D, et al. Detecting hidden spatial and spatio-temporal structures in glasses and complex physical systems by multiresolution network clustering. The European Physical Journal E. 2011 Sep;34(9):105
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Barducci A, Bonomi M, Parrinello M. Metadynamics. WIREs Computational Molecular Science. 2011;1(5):826–843
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Brooks S, Gelman A, Jones G, et al. Handbook of markov chain monte carlo. CRC press; 2011
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Oseledets IV. Tensor-Train Decomposition. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing. 2011 Jan;33(5):2295–2317
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Levitin DJ, Chordia P, Menon V. Musical rhythm spectra from bach to joplin obey a 1/f power law. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012;109(10):3716–3720. Available from: https://www.pnas.org/content/109/10/3716
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Avella A, Mancini F, editors. Strongly Correlated Systems: Theoretical Methods. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2012. Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Rupp M, Tkatchenko A, Müller KR, et al. Fast and accurate modeling of molecular atomization energies with machine learning. Phys Rev Lett. 2012 Jan;108:058301. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.058301
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Snyder JC, Rupp M, Hansen K, et al. Finding density functionals with machine learning. Phys Rev Lett. 2012 Jun;108:253002. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.253002
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ronhovde P, Chakrabarty S, Hu D, et al. Detection of hidden structures for arbitrary scales in complex physical systems. Scientific Reports. 2012 Mar;2(1):329
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Hinton GE. A Practical Guide to Training Restricted Boltzmann Machines. In: Montavon G, Orr GB, Müller KR, editors. Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade. Vol. 7700. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2012. p. 599–619
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fernández-González C, Schuch N, Wolf MM, et al. Gapless hamiltonians for the toric code using the projected entangled pair state formalism. Phys Rev Lett. 2012 Dec;109:260401
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Pilania G, Wang C, Jiang X, et al. Accelerating materials property predictions using machine learning. Scientific Reports. 2013 Sep;3(1):1–6
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bény C. Deep learning and the renormalization group. arXiv:13013124 [quant-ph]. 2013 Mar;
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Devitt SJ, Munro WJ, Nemoto K. Quantum error correction for beginners. Reports on Progress in Physics. 2013 Jun;76(7):076001
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Gens R, Domingos PM. Deep symmetry networks. In: Ghahramani Z, Welling M, Cortes C, et al., editors. Advances in neural information processing systems 27. Curran Associates, Inc.; 2014. p. 2537–2545. Available from: http://papers.nips.cc/paper/5424-deep-symmetry-networks.pdf
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Arsenault LFmc, Lopez-Bezanilla A, von Lilienfeld OA, et al. Machine learning for many-body physics: The case of the anderson impurity model. Phys Rev B. 2014 Oct;90:155136. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.155136
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Mehta P, Schwab DJ. An exact mapping between the Variational Renormalization Group and Deep Learning. arXiv:14103831 [cond-mat, stat]. 2014 Oct;
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Gingras MJP, McClarty PA. Quantum spin ice: A search for gapless quantum spin liquids in pyrochlore magnets. Reports on Progress in Physics. 2014 May;77(5):056501
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, et al. Generative Adversarial Nets. In: Ghahramani Z, Welling M, Cortes C, et al., editors. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27. Curran Associates, Inc.; 2014. p. 2672–2680
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Peruzzo A, McClean J, Shadbolt P, et al. A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor. Nature Communications. 2014 Jul;5:4213
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Farhi E, Goldstone J, Gutmann S. A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm. arXiv:14114028 [quant-ph]. 2014 Nov;
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Schuld M, Sinayskiy I, Petruccione F. The quest for a Quantum Neural Network. Quantum Information Processing. 2014 Nov;13(11):2567–2586
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature. 2015 may;521:436. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Mnih V, Kavukcuoglu K, Silver D, et al. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature. 2015 Feb;518(7540):529–533
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Rezende D, Mohamed S. Variational inference with normalizing flows. In: Bach F, Blei D, editors. Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning; (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research; Vol. 37); 07–09 Jul; Lille, France. PMLR; 2015. p. 1530–1538. Available from: http://proceedings.mlr.press/v37/rezende15.html
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A. Deep learning. MIT Press; 2016. http://www.deeplearningbook.org
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Cohen TS, Welling M. Group equivariant convolutional networks. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning - Volume 48. JMLR.org; 2016. p. 2990–2999; ICML’16
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Li L, Snyder JC, Pelaschier IM, et al. Understanding machine-learned density functionals. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry. 2016;116(11):819–833. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/qua.25040
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Nussinov Z, Ronhovde P, Hu D, et al. Inference of Hidden Structures in Complex Physical Systems by Multi-scale Clustering. In: Lookman T, Alexander FJ, Rajan K, editors. Information Science for Materials Discovery and Design. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. Springer Series in Materials Science; p. 115–138
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Wang L. Discovering phase transitions with unsupervised learning. Phys Rev B. 2016 Nov;94:195105. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.195105
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Torlai G, Melko RG. Learning thermodynamics with boltzmann machines. Phys Rev B. 2016 Oct;94:165134. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.165134
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ziatdinov M, Maksov A, Li L, et al. Deep data mining in a real space: Separation of intertwined electronic responses in a lightly doped BaFe2As2. Nanotechnology. 2016 Oct;27(47):475706
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Stoudenmire E, Schwab DJ. Supervised learning with tensor networks. In: Lee DD, Sugiyama M, Luxburg UV, et al., editors. Advances in neural information processing systems 29. Curran Associates, Inc.; 2016. p. 4799–4807
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Biamonte J, Wittek P, Pancotti N, et al. Quantum machine learning. Nature. 2017 Sep;549(7671):195–202. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23474
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Silver D, Schrittwieser J, Simonyan K, et al. Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge. Nature. 2017 Oct;550(7676):354–359
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bartók AP, De S, Poelking C, et al. Machine learning unifies the modeling of materials and molecules. Science Advances. 2017 Dec;3(12):e1701816
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Brockherde F, Vogt L, Li L, et al. Bypassing the kohn-sham equations with machine learning. Nature Communications. 2017;8(1):872
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Carrasquilla J, Melko RG. Machine learning phases of matter. Nature Physics. 2017 May;13(5):431–434
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ch’ng K, Carrasquilla J, Melko RG, et al. Machine learning phases of strongly correlated fermions. Phys Rev X. 2017 Aug;7:031038. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.7.031038
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Broecker P, Carrasquilla J, Melko RG, et al. Machine learning quantum phases of matter beyond the fermion sign problem. Scientific Reports. 2017 Aug;7(1):8823
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
van Nieuwenburg EPL, Liu YH, Huber SD. Learning phase transitions by confusion. Nature Physics. 2017 May;13(5):435–439
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Hu W, Singh RRP, Scalettar RT. Discovering phases, phase transitions, and crossovers through unsupervised machine learning: A critical examination. Phys Rev E. 2017 Jun;95:062122. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.95.062122
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Wetzel SJ, Scherzer M. Machine learning of explicit order parameters: From the ising model to su(2) lattice gauge theory. Phys Rev B. 2017 Nov;96:184410. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.184410
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Broecker P, Carrasquilla J, Melko RG, et al. Machine learning quantum phases of matter beyond the fermion sign problem. Scientific Reports. 2017 Aug;7(1):1–10
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Wetzel SJ. Unsupervised learning of phase transitions: From principal component analysis to variational autoencoders. Phys Rev E. 2017 Aug;96:022140. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.022140
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Tanaka A, Tomiya A. Detection of phase transition via convolutional neural networks. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan. 2017;86(6):063001. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.86.063001
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Zhang Y, Melko RG, Kim EA. Machine learning 𝕫 2 {\mathbb{z}}_{2} quantum spin liquids with quasiparticle statistics. Phys Rev B. 2017 Dec;96:245119. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.245119
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ponte P, Melko RG. Kernel methods for interpretable machine learning of order parameters. Phys Rev B. 2017 Nov;96:205146. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.205146
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Wang C, Zhai H. Machine learning of frustrated classical spin models. i. principal component analysis. Phys Rev B. 2017 Oct;96:144432. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.144432
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Broecker P, Assaad FF, Trebst S. Quantum phase recognition via unsupervised machine learning. arXiv:170700663 [cond-mat]. 2017 Jul;
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Costa NC, Hu W, Bai ZJ, et al. Principal component analysis for fermionic critical points. Phys Rev B. 2017 Nov;96:195138. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.195138
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Morningstar A, Melko RG. Deep learning the ising model near criticality. J Mach Learn Res. 2017 Jan;18(1):5975–5991
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Carleo G, Troyer M. Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks. Science. 2017 Feb;355(6325):602–606
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Nomura Y, Darmawan AS, Yamaji Y, et al. Restricted boltzmann machine learning for solving strongly correlated quantum systems. Phys Rev B. 2017 Nov;96:205152. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.205152
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Deng DL, Li X, Das Sarma S. Machine learning topological states. Phys Rev B. 2017 Nov;96:195145. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.195145
McBrian K, Carleo G, Khatami E. Ground state phase diagram of the one-dimensional Bose-Hubbard model from restricted Boltzmann machines. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019 Oct;1290:012005
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Choo K, Mezzacapo A, Carleo G. Fermionic neural-network states for ab-initio electronic structure. arXiv:190912852 [cond-mat, physics:physics, physics:quant-ph]. 2019 Sep;
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Schmitt M, Heyl M. Quantum many-body dynamics in two dimensions with artificial neural networks. arXiv:191208828 [cond-mat, physics:quant-ph]. 2019 Dec;
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Yoshioka N, Hamazaki R. Constructing neural stationary states for open quantum many-body systems. Phys Rev B. 2019 Jun;99:214306. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.214306
2019
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Gao X, Duan LM. Efficient representation of quantum many-body states with deep neural networks. Nature Communications. 2017 Sep;8(1):1–6
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Deng DL, Li X, Das Sarma S. Quantum entanglement in neural network states. Phys Rev X. 2017 May;7:021021. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.7.021021
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Becca F, Sorella S. Quantum monte carlo approaches for correlated systems. Cambridge University Press; 2017
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Liu J, Qi Y, Meng ZY, et al. Self-learning monte carlo method. Phys Rev B. 2017 Jan;95:041101. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.041101
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Huang L, Wang L. Accelerated monte carlo simulations with restricted boltzmann machines. Phys Rev B. 2017 Jan;95:035105. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.035105
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Wang L. Exploring cluster monte carlo updates with boltzmann machines. Phys Rev E. 2017 Nov;96:051301. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.051301
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Xu XY, Qi Y, Liu J, et al. Self-learning quantum monte carlo method in interacting fermion systems. Phys Rev B. 2017 Jul;96:041119. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.041119
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Hartmann MJ, Carleo G. Neural-network approach to dissipative quantum many-body dynamics. Phys Rev Lett. 2019 Jun;122:250502. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.250502
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Nagy A, Savona V. Variational quantum monte carlo method with a neural-network ansatz for open quantum systems. Phys Rev Lett. 2019 Jun;122:250501. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.250501
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Vicentini F, Biella A, Regnault N, et al. Variational neural-network ansatz for steady states in open quantum systems. Phys Rev Lett. 2019 Jun;122:250503. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.250503
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Carrasquilla J, Torlai G, Melko RG, et al. Reconstructing quantum states with generative models. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2019 Mar;1(3):155
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Lu S, Gao X, Duan LM. Efficient representation of topologically ordered states with restricted boltzmann machines. Phys Rev B. 2019 Apr;99:155136. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.155136
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Czischek S, Pawlowski JM, Gasenzer T, et al. Sampling scheme for neuromorphic simulation of entangled quantum systems. Phys Rev B. 2019 Nov;100:195120. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.195120
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Choo K, Neupert T, Carleo G. Two-dimensional frustrated J 1 − J 2 {J}_{1}\text{$-$}{J}_{2} model studied with neural network quantum states. Phys Rev B. 2019 Sep;100:125124. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.125124
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Irikura N, Saito H. Neural-network quantum states at finite temperature. arXiv:191102774 [cond-mat, physics:quant-ph]. 2019 Nov;
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Luo D, Clark BK. Backflow transformations via neural networks for quantum many-body wave functions. Phys Rev Lett. 2019 Jun;122:226401. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.226401
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Hermann J, Schätzle Z, Noé F. Deep neural network solution of the electronic Schr\”odinger equation. arXiv:190908423 [physics, stat]. 2019 Dec;
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Pfau D, Spencer JS, Matthews AGdG, et al. Ab-Initio Solution of the Many-Electron Schr\”odinger Equation with Deep Neural Networks. arXiv:190902487 [physics]. 2019 Sep;
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Jia ZA, Yi B, Zhai R, et al. Quantum Neural Network States: A Brief Review of Methods and Applications. Advanced Quantum Technologies. 2019;2(7-8):1800077
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Li S, Dee PM, Khatami E, et al. Accelerating lattice quantum monte carlo simulations using artificial neural networks: Application to the holstein model. Phys Rev B. 2019 Jul;100:020302. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.020302
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Nagai Y, Okumura M, Kobayashi K, et al. Self-learning Hybrid Monte Carlo: A First-principles Approach. arXiv:190902255 [cond-mat, physics:physics]. 2019 Sep;
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Song T, Lee H. Accelerated continuous time quantum monte carlo method with machine learning. Phys Rev B. 2019 Jul;100:045153. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.045153
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Pilati S, Inack EM, Pieri P. Self-learning projective quantum monte carlo simulations guided by restricted boltzmann machines. Phys Rev E. 2019 Oct;100:043301. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.100.043301
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Zhao KW, Kao WH, Wu KH, et al. Generation of ice states through deep reinforcement learning. Phys Rev E. 2019 Jun;99:062106. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.99.062106
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Wu D, Wang L, Zhang P. Solving statistical mechanics using variational autoregressive networks. Phys Rev Lett. 2019 Feb;122:080602. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.080602
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Urban JM, Pawlowski JM. Reducing Autocorrelation Times in Lattice Simulations with Generative Adversarial Networks. arXiv:181103533 [hep-lat, physics:physics]. 2019 Dec;
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Albergo MS, Kanwar G, Shanahan PE. Flow-based generative models for markov chain monte carlo in lattice field theory. Phys Rev D. 2019 Aug;100:034515. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034515
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Zhou K, Endrődi G, Pang LG, et al. Regressive and generative neural networks for scalar field theory. Phys Rev D. 2019 Jul;100:011501. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.011501
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Noé F, Olsson S, Köhler J, et al. Boltzmann generators: Sampling equilibrium states of many-body systems with deep learning. Science. 2019;365(6457)
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Xu H, Li J, Liu L, et al. Generalizable control for quantum parameter estimation through reinforcement learning. npj Quantum Information. 2019 Oct;5(1):1–8
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Torlai G, Timar B, van Nieuwenburg EPL, et al. Integrating neural networks with a quantum simulator for state reconstruction. Phys Rev Lett. 2019 Dec;123:230504. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.230504
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Andreasson P, Johansson J, Liljestrand S, et al. Quantum error correction for the toric code using deep reinforcement learning. Quantum. 2019 Sep;3:183. Available from: https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2019-09-02-183
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Liu YH, Poulin D. Neural belief-propagation decoders for quantum error-correcting codes. Phys Rev Lett. 2019 May;122:200501. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.200501
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Poulsen Nautrup H, Delfosse N, Dunjko V, et al. Optimizing Quantum Error Correction Codes with Reinforcement Learning. Quantum. 2019 Dec;3:215. Available from: https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2019-12-16-215
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Valenti A, van Nieuwenburg E, Huber S, et al. Hamiltonian learning for quantum error correction. Phys Rev Research. 2019 Nov;1:033092. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.033092
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Day AGR, Bukov M, Weinberg P, et al. Glassy phase of optimal quantum control. Phys Rev Lett. 2019 Jan;122:020601. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.020601
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Niu MY, Boixo S, Smelyanskiy VN, et al. Universal quantum control through deep reinforcement learning. npj Quantum Information. 2019 Apr;5(1):1–8
2019
Later among the works it cites.
An Z, Zhou DL. Deep reinforcement learning for quantum gate control. EPL (Europhysics Letters). 2019 Jul;126(6):60002
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Zhang XM, Wei Z, Asad R, et al. When does reinforcement learning stand out in quantum control? A comparative study on state preparation. npj Quantum Information. 2019 Oct;5(1):1–7
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Arrazola JM, Bromley TR, Izaac J, et al. Machine learning method for state preparation and gate synthesis on photonic quantum computers. Quantum Science and Technology. 2019 Jan;4(2):024004
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Killoran N, Izaac J, Quesada N, et al. Strawberry Fields: A Software Platform for Photonic Quantum Computing. Quantum. 2019 Mar;3:129. Available from: https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2019-03-11-129
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Verdon G, Broughton M, McClean JR, et al. Learning to learn with quantum neural networks via classical neural networks. arXiv:190705415 [quant-ph]. 2019 Jul;
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Vanschoren J. Meta-Learning. In: Hutter F, Kotthoff L, Vanschoren J, editors. Automated Machine Learning: Methods, Systems, Challenges. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. The Springer Series on Challenges in Machine Learning; p. 35–61
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Orús R. Tensor networks for complex quantum systems. Nature Reviews Physics. 2019 Sep;1(9):538–550
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Liu D, Ran SJ, Wittek P, et al. Machine learning by unitary tensor network of hierarchical tree structure. New Journal of Physics. 2019 Jul;21(7):073059
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Evenbly G. Number-State Preserving Tensor Networks as Classifiers for Supervised Learning. arXiv:190506352 [quant-ph, stat]. 2019 May;
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Stokes J, Terilla J. Probabilistic Modeling with Matrix Product States. Entropy. 2019 Dec;21(12):1236
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Bradley TD, Stoudenmire EM, Terilla J. Modeling Sequences with Quantum States: A Look Under the Hood. arXiv:191007425 [quant-ph, stat]. 2019 Oct;
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Glasser I, Sweke R, Pancotti N, et al. Expressive power of tensor-network factorizations for probabilistic modeling. In: Wallach H, Larochelle H, Beygelzimer A, et al., editors. Advances in neural information processing systems 32. Curran Associates, Inc.; 2019. p. 1498–1510
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Uranga BM, Lamacraft A. Schr\”odingeRNN: Generative Modeling of Raw Audio as a Continuously Observed Quantum State. arXiv:191111879 [cond-mat]. 2019 Nov;
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Roberts C, Milsted A, Ganahl M, et al. TensorNetwork: A Library for Physics and Machine Learning. arXiv:190501330 [cond-mat, physics:hep-th, physics:physics, stat]. 2019 May;
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Benedetti M, Lloyd E, Sack S, et al. Parameterized quantum circuits as machine learning models. Quantum Science and Technology. 2019 Nov;4(4):043001
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Havlíček V, Córcoles AD, Temme K, et al. Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces. Nature. 2019 Mar;567(7747):209–212
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Zhu D, Linke NM, Benedetti M, et al. Training of quantum circuits on a hybrid quantum computer. Science Advances. 2019 Oct;5(10):eaaw9918
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Hu L, Wu SH, Cai W, et al. Quantum generative adversarial learning in a superconducting quantum circuit. Science Advances. 2019 Jan;5(1):eaav2761
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Verdon G, Broughton M, Biamonte J. A quantum algorithm to train neural networks using low-depth circuits. arXiv:171205304 [cond-mat, physics:quant-ph]. 2019 Aug;
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Benedetti M, Garcia-Pintos D, Perdomo O, et al. A generative modeling approach for benchmarking and training shallow quantum circuits. npj Quantum Information. 2019 May;5(1):1–9
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Zeng J, Wu Y, Liu JG, et al. Learning and inference on generative adversarial quantum circuits. Phys Rev A. 2019 May;99:052306. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.99.052306
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Romero J, Aspuru-Guzik A. Variational quantum generators: Generative adversarial quantum machine learning for continuous distributions. arXiv:190100848 [quant-ph]. 2019 Jan;
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Goldt S, Advani M, Saxe AM, et al. Dynamics of stochastic gradient descent for two-layer neural networks in the teacher-student setup. In: Wallach H, Larochelle H, Beygelzimer A, et al., editors. Advances in neural information processing systems 32. Curran Associates, Inc.; 2019. p. 6981–6991
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Zhang Y, Ginsparg P, Kim EA. Interpreting machine learning of topological quantum phase transitions. arXiv:191210057 [cond-mat, physics:physics]. 2019 Dec;
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Senior AW, Evans R, Jumper J, et al. Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning. Nature. 2020 Jan;:1–5
2020
Closest in time.
Dunjko V, Wittek P. A non-review of Quantum Machine Learning: trends and explorations. Quantum Views. 2020 Mar;4:32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.22331/qv-2020-03-17-32
2020
Closest in time.
Oakes THE, Moss A, Garrahan JP. A Deep Learning Functional Estimator of Optimal Dynamics for Sampling Large Deviations. arXiv:200109719 [cond-mat]. 2020 Jan;
2020
Closest in time.
Lozano-Gómez D, Pereira D, Gingras MJP. Unsupervised Machine Learning of Quenched Gauge Symmetries: A Proof-of-Concept Demonstration. arXiv:200300039 [cond-mat, physics:physics]. 2020 Feb;
2020
Closest in time.
Kottmann K, Huembeli P, Lewenstein M, et al. Unsupervised phase discovery with deep anomaly detection. arXiv:200309905 [cond-mat, physics:quant-ph]. 2020 Mar;
2020
Closest in time.
Salcedo-Gallo JS, Galindo-González CC, Restrepo-Parra E. Deep learning approach for image classification of magnetic phases in chiral magnets. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 2020 May;501:166482
2020
Closest in time.
Greplova E, Valenti A, Boschung G, et al. Unsupervised identification of topological phase transitions using predictive models. New Journal of Physics. 2020 Apr;22(4):045003
2020
Closest in time.
Rigo JB, Mitchell AK. Machine learning effective models for quantum systems. Phys Rev B. 2020 Jun;101:241105. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.241105
2020
Closest in time.
Iten R, Metger T, Wilming H, et al. Discovering physical concepts with neural networks. Phys Rev Lett. 2020 Jan;124:010508. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.010508
2020
Closest in time.
Wetzel SJ, Melko RG, Scott J, et al. Discovering Symmetry Invariants and Conserved Quantities by Interpreting Siamese Neural Networks. arXiv:200304299 [cond-mat, physics:physics]. 2020 Mar;
2020
Closest in time.
Khatami E, Guardado-Sanchez E, Spar BM, et al. Visualizing Correlations in the 2D Fermi-Hubbard Model with AI. arXiv:200212310 [cond-mat]. 2020 Feb;
2020
Closest in time.
Casert C, Mills K, Vieijra T, et al. Optical lattice experiments at unobserved conditions and scales through generative adversarial deep learning. arXiv:200207055 [cond-mat, physics:physics]. 2020 Feb;
2020
Closest in time.
Vargas-Calderón V, Vinck-Posada H, González FA. Phase diagram reconstruction of the Bose-Hubbard model with a Restricted Boltzmann Machine wavefunction. arXiv:200412556 [cond-mat, physics:quant-ph]. 2020 Apr;
2020
Closest in time.
Huang HY, Kueng R, Preskill J. Predicting Many Properties of a Quantum System from Very Few Measurements. arXiv:200208953 [quant-ph]. 2020 Apr;
2020
Closest in time.
Vieijra T, Casert C, Nys J, et al. Restricted boltzmann machines for quantum states with non-abelian or anyonic symmetries. Phys Rev Lett. 2020 Mar;124:097201. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.097201
2020
Closest in time.
Szabó A, Castelnovo C. Neural network wave functions and the sign problem. arXiv:200204613 [cond-mat, physics:physics, physics:quant-ph]. 2020 Feb;
2020
Closest in time.
Sharir O, Levine Y, Wies N, et al. Deep autoregressive models for the efficient variational simulation of many-body quantum systems. Phys Rev Lett. 2020 Jan;124:020503. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.020503
2020
Closest in time.
Hibat-Allah M, Ganahl M, Hayward LE, et al. Recurrent Neural Network Wavefunctions. arXiv:200202973 [cond-mat, physics:physics, physics:quant-ph]. 2020 Feb;
2020
Closest in time.
Roth C. Iterative Retraining of Quantum Spin Models Using Recurrent Neural Networks. arXiv:200306228 [cond-mat, physics:physics]. 2020 Mar;
2020
Closest in time.
Liu Y, Wang W, Sun K, et al. Designer monte carlo simulation for the gross-neveu-yukawa transition. Phys Rev B. 2020 Feb;101:064308. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.064308
2020
Closest in time.
Mills K, Ronagh P, Tamblyn I. Controlled Online Optimization Learning (COOL): Finding the ground state of spin Hamiltonians with reinforcement learning. arXiv:200300011 [physics]. 2020 Feb;
2020
Closest in time.
Sprague K, Carrasquilla J, Whitelam S, et al. Watch and learn – a generalized approach for transferrable learning in deep neural networks via physical principles. arXiv:200302647 [physics]. 2020 Mar;
2020
Closest in time.
McNaughton B, Milošević MV, Perali A, et al. Boosting Monte Carlo simulations of spin glasses using autoregressive neural networks. arXiv:200204292 [cond-mat, physics:physics]. 2020 Feb;
2020
Closest in time.
Nicoli KA, Nakajima S, Strodthoff N, et al. Asymptotically unbiased estimation of physical observables with neural samplers. Phys Rev E. 2020 Feb;101:023304. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.101.023304
2020
Closest in time.
Lohani S, Kirby BT, Brodsky M, et al. Machine learning assisted quantum state estimation. arXiv:200303441 [quant-ph]. 2020 Mar;
2020
Closest in time.
Youssry A, Paz-Silva GA, Ferrie C. Beyond Quantum Noise Spectroscopy: Modelling and mitigating noise with quantum feature engineering. arXiv:200306827 [quant-ph]. 2020 Mar;
2020
Closest in time.
Schäfer F, Kloc M, Bruder C, et al. A differentiable programming method for quantum control. arXiv:200208376 [cond-mat, physics:physics, physics:quant-ph]. 2020 Feb;
2020
Closest in time.
Yao J, Bukov M, Lin L. Policy Gradient based Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm. arXiv:200201068 [cond-mat, physics:physics, physics:quant-ph]. 2020 Feb;
2020
Closest in time.
González FA, Vargas-Calderón V, Vinck-Posada H. Supervised Learning with Quantum Measurements. arXiv:200401227 [quant-ph]. 2020 Apr;
2020
Closest in time.
Miller J, Rabusseau G, Terilla J. Tensor Networks for Language Modeling. arXiv:200301039 [quant-ph, stat]. 2020 Mar;
2020
Closest in time.
Ran SJ. Bayesian Tensor Network with Polynomial Complexity for Probabilistic Machine Learning. arXiv:191212923 [cond-mat, stat]. 2020 Jan;
2020
Closest in time.
Bergholm V, Izaac J, Schuld M, et al. PennyLane: Automatic differentiation of hybrid quantum-classical computations. arXiv:181104968 [physics, physics:quant-ph]. 2020 Feb;
2020
Closest in time.
Broughton M, Verdon G, McCourt T, et al. TensorFlow Quantum: A Software Framework for Quantum Machine Learning. arXiv:200302989 [cond-mat, physics:quant-ph]. 2020 Mar;
2020
Closest in time.
Situ H, He Z, Wang Y, et al. Quantum generative adversarial network for generating discrete distribution. Information Sciences. 2020 Oct;538:193–208
2020
Closest in time.
Trenti M, Sestini L, Gianelle A, et al. Quantum-inspired Machine Learning on high-energy physics data. arXiv:200413747 [cond-mat, physics:hep-ex, physics:physics, physics:quant-ph, stat]. 2020 Apr;
2020
Closest in time.
Bahri Y, Kadmon J, Pennington J, et al. Statistical mechanics of deep learning. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics. 2020;11(1):501–528
2020
Closest in time.
Blücher S, Kades L, Pawlowski JM, et al. Towards novel insights in lattice field theory with explainable machine learning. Phys Rev D. 2020 May;101:094507. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.094507
2020
Closest in time.
Dawid A, Huembeli P, Tomza M, et al. Phase Detection with Neural Networks: Interpreting the Black Box. arXiv:200404711 [cond-mat, physics:quant-ph]. 2020 Apr;
2020
Closest in time.