Fetching the paper…

Reading the bibliography…

2020

Fourth post-Newtonian effective-one-body Hamiltonians with generic spins

Khalil, Mohammed, Steinhoff, Jan, Vines, Justin et al.

Original
PDF
Post on X

Understand

In a compact binary coalescence, the spins of the compact objects can have a significant effect on the orbital motion and gravitational-wave (GW) emission.

For generic spin orientations, the orbital plane precesses, leading to characteristic modulations of the GW signal.
The observation of precession effects is crucial to discriminate among different binary formation scenarios, and to carry out precise tests of General Relativity.
Here, we work toward an improved description of spin effects in binary inspirals, within the effective-one-body (EOB) formalism, which is commonly used to build waveform models for LIGO and Virgo data analysis.

Fourth post-Newtonian effective-one-body Hamiltonians with generic spins · Around

Built on

A. Antonelli, A. Buonanno, J. Steinhoff, M. van de Meent, and J. Vines, “Energetics of two-body Hamiltonians in post-Minkowskian gravity,” Phys. Rev. D99
Original
1901
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Foffa, P. Mastrolia, R. Sturani, C. Sturm, and W. J. Torres Bobadilla, “Static two-body potential at fifth post-Newtonian order,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122
Original
1902
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Blümlein, A. Maier, and P. Marquard, “Five-Loop Static Contribution to the Gravitational Interaction Potential of Two Point Masses,” Phys. Lett. B800
Original
1902
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Foffa and R. Sturani, “Conservative dynamics of binary systems to fourth Post-Newtonian order in the EFT approach I: Regularized Lagrangian,” Phys. Rev. D100
Original
1903
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Antonelli, M. van de Meent, A. Buonanno, J. Steinhoff, and J. Vines, “Quasicircular inspirals and plunges from nonspinning effective-one-body Hamiltonians with gravitational self-force information,” Phys. Rev. D101
Original
1907
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Bini, T. Damour, and A. Geralico, “Novel approach to binary dynamics: application to the fifth post-Newtonian level,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123
Original
1909
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Rettegno, F. Martinetti, A. Nagar, D. Bini, G. Riemenschneider, and T. Damour, “Comparing Effective One Body Hamiltonians for spin-aligned coalescing binaries,” (2019), arXiv:1911.10818 [gr-qc]
Original
1911
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Mathisson, “Neue mechanik materieller systemes,” Acta Phys. Polon. 6
1937
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Papapetrou, “Spinning test particles in general relativity. 1.” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A209
1951
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Corinaldesi and A. Papapetrou, “Spinning test particles in general relativity. 2.” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A209
1951
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. Tulczyjew, “Equations of motion of rotating bodies in general relativity theory,” Acta Phys. Polon. 18
1959
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. M. Barker and R. F. O’Connell, “Derivation of the equations of motion of a gyroscope from the quantum theory of gravitation,” Phys. Rev. D2
1970
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. M. Barker and R. F. O’Connell, “Gravitational Two-Body Problem with Arbitrary Masses, Spins, and Quadrupole Moments,” Phys. Rev. D12
1975
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. D. D’Eath, “Interaction of two black holes in the slow-motion limit,” Phys. Rev. D12
1975
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. G. Dixon, “Extended bodies in general relativity: their description and motion.” in Isolated Gravitating Systems in General Relativity , edited by J. Ehlers (1979) pp. 156–219
1979
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. M. Barker and R. F. O’Connell, “The gravitational interaction: Spin, rotation, and quantum effects—a review,” Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 11
1979
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Damour, “Probléme des deux corps et freinage de rayonnement en relativité générale,” C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. II 294
1982
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. S. Thorne and J. B. Hartle, “Laws of motion and precession for black holes and other bodies,” Phys. Rev. D31
1985
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Damour and G. Schäfer, “Higher Order Relativistic Periastron Advances and Binary Pulsars,” Nuovo Cim. B101
1988
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Poisson, “Gravitational waves from inspiraling compact binaries: The Quadrupole moment term,” Phys. Rev. D57
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Buonanno and T. Damour, “Effective one-body approach to general relativistic two-body dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D59
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Buonanno and T. Damour, “Transition from inspiral to plunge in binary black hole coalescences,” Phys. Rev. D62
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Damour, P. Jaranowski, and G. Schäfer, “On the determination of the last stable orbit for circular general relativistic binaries at the third post-Newtonian approximation,” Phys. Rev. D62
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Damour, “Coalescence of two spinning black holes: an effective one-body approach,” Phys. Rev. D64
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Tagoshi, A. Ohashi, and B. J. Owen, “Gravitational field and equations of motion of spinning compact binaries to 2.5 postNewtonian order,” Phys. Rev. D63
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Blümlein, A. Maier, P. Marquard, and G. Schäfer, “Fourth post-Newtonian Hamiltonian dynamics of two-body systems from an effective field theory approach,” (2020a), arXiv:2003.01692 [gr-qc]
Original
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Buonanno, Y. Chen, and T. Damour, “Transition from inspiral to plunge in precessing binaries of spinning black holes,” Phys. Rev. D74
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Faye, L. Blanchet, and A. Buonanno, “Higher-order spin effects in the dynamics of compact binaries. I. Equations of motion,” Phys. Rev. D74
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. A. Porto and I. Z. Rothstein, “Calculation of the First Nonlinear Contribution to the General-Relativistic Spin-Spin Interaction for Binary Systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. B. Gilmore and A. Ross, “Effective field theory calculation of second post-Newtonian binary dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D78
Original
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

Y. Pan, A. Buonanno, L. T. Buchman, T. Chu, L. E. Kidder, H. P. Pfeiffer, and M. A. Scheel, “Effective-one-body waveforms calibrated to numerical relativity simulations: coalescence of non-precessing, spinning, equal-mass black holes,” Phys. Rev. D81
Original
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
E. Barausse and A. Buonanno, “An Improved effective-one-body Hamiltonian for spinning black-hole binaries,” Phys. Rev. D81
Original
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
T. Damour, “Gravitational Self Force in a Schwarzschild Background and the Effective One Body Formalism,” Phys. Rev. D81
Original
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Mathisson, “Republication of: New mechanics of material systems,” Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 42
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
R. A. Porto, “Next to leading order spin-orbit effects in the motion of inspiralling compact binaries,” Class. Quant. Grav. 27

Then

S. Balmelli and P. Jetzer, “Effective-one-body Hamiltonian with next-to-leading order spin-spin coupling,” Phys. Rev. D91
Original
2015
Later among the works it cites.
S. Balmelli and T. Damour, “New effective-one-body Hamiltonian with next-to-leading order spin-spin coupling,” Phys. Rev. D92
Original
2015
Later among the works it cites.
A. Bohé, G. Faye, S. Marsat, and E. K. Porter, “Quadratic-in-spin effects in the orbital dynamics and gravitational-wave energy flux of compact binaries at the 3PN order,” Class. Quant. Grav. 32
Original
2015
Later among the works it cites.
S. Marsat, “Cubic order spin effects in the dynamics and gravitational wave energy flux of compact object binaries,” Class. Quant. Grav. 32
Original
2015
Later among the works it cites.
V. Vaidya, “Gravitational spin Hamiltonians from the S matrix,” Phys. Rev. D91

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Original

2010

Cited alongside, same era.

R. A. Porto and I. Z. Rothstein, “Spin(1)Spin(2) Effects in the Motion of Inspiralling Compact Binaries at Third Order in the Post-Newtonian Expansion,” Phys. Rev. D78

2010

Cited alongside, same era.

R. A. Porto and I. Z. Rothstein, “Next to Leading Order Spin(1)Spin(1) Effects in the Motion of Inspiralling Compact Binaries,” Phys. Rev. D78

2010

Cited alongside, same era.

B. Iyer et al. (LIGO Collaboration), “LIGO-India, Proposal of the Consortium for Indian Initiative in Gravitational-wave Observations,” (2011), LIGO Document M1100296-v2

2011

Cited alongside, same era.

E. Barausse and A. Buonanno, “Extending the effective-one-body Hamiltonian of black-hole binaries to include next-to-next-to-leading spin-orbit couplings,” Phys. Rev. D84

2011

Cited alongside, same era.

D. L. Perrodin, “Subleading Spin-Orbit Correction to the Newtonian Potential in Effective Field Theory Formalism,” in Proceedings of the 12th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity (World Scientific, Singapore, 2011) pp. 725–727, arXiv:1005.0634 [gr-qc]

2011

Cited alongside, same era.

E. Barausse, E. Racine, and A. Buonanno, “Hamiltonian of a spinning test-particle in curved spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D80

2012

Cited alongside, same era.

A. Taracchini, Y. Pan, A. Buonanno, E. Barausse, M. Boyle, T. Chu, G. Lovelace, H. P. Pfeiffer, and M. A. Scheel, “Prototype effective-one-body model for nonprecessing spinning inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms,” Phys. Rev. D86

2012

Cited alongside, same era.

2015

Later among the works it cites.

T. Damour, P. Jaranowski, and G. Schäfer, “Fourth post-Newtonian effective one-body dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D91

2015

Later among the works it cites.

A. Nagar, T. Damour, C. Reisswig, and D. Pollney, “Energetics and phasing of nonprecessing spinning coalescing black hole binaries,” Phys. Rev. D93

2016

Later among the works it cites.

J. Vines, D. Kunst, J. Steinhoff, and T. Hinderer, “Canonical Hamiltonian for an extended test body in curved spacetime: To quadratic order in spin,” Phys. Rev. D93

2016

Later among the works it cites.

T. Hinderer et al. , “Effects of neutron-star dynamic tides on gravitational waveforms within the effective-one-body approach,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116

2016

Later among the works it cites.

J. Steinhoff, T. Hinderer, A. Buonanno, and A. Taracchini, “Dynamical Tides in General Relativity: Effective Action and Effective-One-Body Hamiltonian,” Phys. Rev. D94

2016

Later among the works it cites.

T. Damour, “Gravitational scattering, post-Minkowskian approximation and Effective One-Body theory,” Phys. Rev. D94

2016

Later among the works it cites.

D. Bini, T. Damour, and A. Geralico, “Spin-dependent two-body interactions from gravitational self-force computations,” Phys. Rev. D92

2016

Later among the works it cites.

B. Abbott et al. (Virgo, LIGO Scientific), “GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119

2017

Later among the works it cites.

A. Nagar, G. Riemenschneider, and G. Pratten, “Impact of Numerical Relativity information on effective-one-body waveform models,” Phys. Rev. D96

2017

Later among the works it cites.

A. Bohé et al. , “Improved effective-one-body model of spinning, nonprecessing binary black holes for the era of gravitational-wave astrophysics with advanced detectors,” Phys. Rev. D95

2017

Later among the works it cites.

S. Babak, A. Taracchini, and A. Buonanno, “Validating the effective-one-body model of spinning, precessing binary black holes against numerical relativity,” Phys. Rev. D95

2017

Later among the works it cites.

L. Bernard, L. Blanchet, A. Bohé, G. Faye, and S. Marsat, “Energy and periastron advance of compact binaries on circular orbits at the fourth post-Newtonian order,” Phys. Rev. D95

2017

Later among the works it cites.

T. Dietrich, S. Bernuzzi, M. Ujevic, and W. Tichy, “Gravitational waves and mass ejecta from binary neutron star mergers: Effect of the stars’ rotation,” Phys. Rev. D95

2017

Later among the works it cites.

A. Nagar et al. , “Time-domain effective-one-body gravitational waveforms for coalescing compact binaries with nonprecessing spins, tides and self-spin effects,” Phys. Rev. D98

2018

Later among the works it cites.

R. Cotesta, A. Buonanno, A. Bohé, A. Taracchini, I. Hinder, and S. Ossokine, “Enriching the Symphony of Gravitational Waves from Binary Black Holes by Tuning Higher Harmonics,” Phys. Rev. D98

2018

Later among the works it cites.

T. Damour, “High-energy gravitational scattering and the general relativistic two-body problem,” Phys. Rev. D97

2018

Later among the works it cites.

J. Vines and J. Steinhoff, “Spin-multipole effects in binary black holes and the test-body limit,” Phys. Rev. D97

2018

Later among the works it cites.

S. Ossokine, T. Dietrich, E. Foley, R. Katebi, and G. Lovelace, “Assessing the Energetics of Spinning Binary Black Hole Systems,” Phys. Rev. D98

2018

Later among the works it cites.

B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs,” Phys. Rev. X9

Original

2019

Later among the works it cites.

S. Akcay, S. Bernuzzi, F. Messina, A. Nagar, N. Ortiz, and P. Rettegno, “Effective-one-body multipolar waveform for tidally interacting binary neutron stars up to merger,” Phys. Rev. D99

2019

Later among the works it cites.

A. Nagar and P. Rettegno, “Efficient effective one body time-domain gravitational waveforms,” Phys. Rev. D99

2019

Later among the works it cites.

A. Nagar, F. Messina, P. Rettegno, D. Bini, T. Damour, A. Geralico, S. Akcay, and S. Bernuzzi, “Nonlinear-in-spin effects in effective-one-body waveform models of spin-aligned, inspiralling, neutron star binaries,” Phys. Rev. D99

2019

Later among the works it cites.

T. Damour, B. R. Iyer, and A. Nagar, “Improved resummation of post-Newtonian multipolar waveforms from circularized compact binaries,” Phys. Rev. D79

2069

Closest in time.

S. Hergt, J. Steinhoff, and G. Schäfer, “Reduced Hamiltonian for next-to-leading order Spin-Squared Dynamics of General Compact Binaries,” Class. Quant. Grav. 27

2093

Closest in time.

S. Hergt, J. Steinhoff, and G. Schäfer, “Elimination of the spin supplementary condition in the effective field theory approach to the post-Newtonian approximation,” Annals Phys. 327

Original

2094

Closest in time.