Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
In this short note, we comment on the existence of two more fermionic unitary minimal models not included in recent work by Hsieh, Nakayama, and Tachikawa.
A. Karch, D. Tong, and C. Turner, SciPost Physics 7
1902
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Friedan, Z. Qiu, and S. Shenker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52
1984
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. B. Zuber, Phys. Lett. B176
1986
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. L. Cardy, Nucl. Phys. B275
1986
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Senechal, Conformal Field Theory , Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997)
1997
Cited alongside, same era.
P. Ruelle and O. Verhoeven, Nuclear Physics B 535
1998
Cited alongside, same era.
2002
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Cappelli, C. Otzykson, and J.-B. Zuber, Nuclear Physics B 280
Cited in the paper.
A. Cappelli, C. Itzykson, and J.-B. Zuber, Communications in Mathematical Physics 113
Cited in the paper.
It is shown in [ 14 ] that the unitary minimal models do not have an ‘t Hooft anomaly
Cited in the paper.
It should be stressed that it does not make sense to think of one bosonization as being more fundamental. T f T_{f} and T f × Arf T_{f}\times\Arf are simply related by a trivial topological phase inherently linked to the Grassmann parity
Cited in the paper.
2002
Later among the works it cites.
A. Kapustin, R. Thorngren, A. Turzillo, and Z. Wang, Journal of High Energy Physics 2015
2015
Later among the works it cites.
D. Gaiotto and J. Kulp, To appear (2020)
2020
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…