Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Sequential recommendation aims to identify and recommend the next few items for a user that the user is most likely to purchase/review, given the user's purchase/rating trajectories.
S. Rendle, C. Freudenthaler, and L. Schmidt-Thieme, “Factorizing personalized markov chains for next-basket recommendation,” in Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web . ACM, 2010, pp. 811–820
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Kabbur, X. Ning, and G. Karypis, “Fism: factored item similarity models for top-n recommender systems,” in Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining , 2013, pp. 659–667
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. R. Min, X. Ning, C. Cheng, and M. Gerstein, “Interpretable sparse high-order boltzmann machines,” in Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , 2014, pp. 614–622
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Q. Yuan, G. Cong, and A. Sun, “Graph-based point-of-interest recommendation with geographical and temporal influences,” in Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management . ACM, 2014, pp. 659–668
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. He and J. McAuley, “Fusing similarity models with markov chains for sparse sequential recommendation,” in 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) . IEEE, 2016, pp. 191–200
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. He and J. McAuley, “Ups and downs: Modeling the visual evolution of fashion trends with one-class collaborative filtering,” in proceedings of the 25th international conference on world wide web . International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 2016, pp. 507–517
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. M. Harper and J. A. Konstan, “The movielens datasets: History and context,” Acm transactions on interactive intelligent systems (tiis) , vol. 5, no. 4, p. 19, 2016
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Zhao, T. Zhao, H. Yang, M. R. Lyu, and I. King, “Stellar: spatial-temporal latent ranking for successive point-of-interest recommendation,” in Thirtieth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , 2016
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Quadrana, A. Karatzoglou, B. Hidasi, and P. Cremonesi, “Personalizing session-based recommendations with hierarchical recurrent neural networks,” in Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Recommender Systems . ACM, 2017, pp. 130–137
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Li, P. Ren, Z. Chen, Z. Ren, T. Lian, and J. Ma, “Neural attentive session-based recommendation,” in Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management , 2017, pp. 1419–1428
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
B. Hidasi and A. Karatzoglou, “Recurrent neural networks with top-k gains for session-based recommendations,” in Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management . ACM, 2018, pp. 843–852
2018
M. Wan and J. McAuley, “Item recommendation on monotonic behavior chains,” in Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems . ACM, 2018, pp. 86–94
2018
Later among the works it cites.
M. F. Dacrema, P. Cremonesi, and D. Jannach, “Are we really making much progress? a worrying analysis of recent neural recommendation approaches,” 2019
2019
Later among the works it cites.
M. Ludewig, N. Mauro, S. Latifi, and D. Jannach, “Performance comparison of neural and non-neural approaches to session-based recommendation,” in Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems , ser. RecSys ’19. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2019, p. 462–466. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3298689.3347041
2019
Later among the works it cites.
2019
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Tang and K. Wang, “Personalized top-n sequential recommendation via convolutional sequence embedding,” in Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining . ACM, 2018, pp. 565–573
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Beutel, P. Covington, S. Jain, C. Xu, J. Li, V. Gatto, and E. H. Chi, “Latent cross: Making use of context in recurrent recommender systems,” in Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining , 2018, pp. 46–54
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Q. Liu, Y. Zeng, R. Mokhosi, and H. Zhang, “Stamp: short-term attention/memory priority model for session-based recommendation,” in Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining , 2018, pp. 1831–1839
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
W.-C. Kang and J. McAuley, “Self-attentive sequential recommendation,” in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) . IEEE, 2018, pp. 197–206
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
X. He, Z. He, X. Du, and T.-S. Chua, “Adversarial personalized ranking for recommendation,” in The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval , 2018, pp. 355–364
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
“Amazon review dataset,” {http://jmcauley.ucsd.edu/data/amazon/}
Cited in the paper.
“Goodreads dataset,” https://www.goodreads.com/
Cited in the paper.
F. Yuan, A. Karatzoglou, I. Arapakis, J. M. Jose, and X. He, “A simple convolutional generative network for next item recommendation,” in Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining , 2019, pp. 582–590
2019
Later among the works it cites.
G. Zhou, N. Mou, Y. Fan, Q. Pi, W. Bian, C. Zhou, X. Zhu, and K. Gai, “Deep interest evolution network for click-through rate prediction,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , vol. 33, 2019, pp. 5941–5948
2019
Later among the works it cites.
S. Jain and B. C. Wallace, “Attention is not explanation,” in Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) , 2019, pp. 3543–3556
2019
Later among the works it cites.
S. Serrano and N. A. Smith, “Is attention interpretable?” in Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , 2019, pp. 2931–2951
2019
Later among the works it cites.
MovieLens, “Movielens dataset,” https://movielens.org/
2020
Closest in time.