Built on

M.S. Madhavacheril, N. Battaglia, K.M. Smith, J.L. Sievers, Cosmology with kSZ: breaking the optical depth degeneracy with Fast Radio Bursts, Phys. Rev. D 100, 103532 (2019) [arXiv:1901.02418]
Original
1901
Earlier work this paper cites.
J.X. Prochaska and Y. Zheng, Probing Galactic haloes with fast radio bursts, MNRAS 485, 648 (2019) [arXiv:1901.11051]
Original
1901
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Caleb, C. Flynn, B. Stappers, Constraining the era of helium reionization using fast radio bursts, MNRAS 485, 2281 (2019) [arXiv:1902.06981]
Original
1902
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Kumar, E.V. Linder, Use of Fast Radio Burst Dispersion Measures as Distance Measures, Phys. Rev. D 100, 083533 (2019) [arXiv:1903.08175]
Original
1903
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. Ravi et al., Fast Radio Burst Tomography of the Unseen Universe, arXiv:1903.06535
Original
1903
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Petroff, J.W.T. Hessels, D.R. Lorimer, Fast Radio Bursts, Astron. Astroph. Rev. 27, 4 (2019) [arXiv:1904.07947]
Original
1904
Earlier work this paper cites.
R.E. Keeley, A. Shafieloo, B. L’Huillier, E.V. Linder, Debiasing Cosmic Gravitational Wave Sirens, MNRAS 491, 3983 (2020) [arXiv:1905.10216]
Original
1905
Earlier work this paper cites.
J.M. Cordes, S. Chatterjee, Fast Radio Bursts: An Extragalactic Enigma, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astroph. 57, 417 (2019) [arXiv:1906.05878]
Original
1906
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

E.V. Linder, A. Mitra, Photometric Supernovae Redshift Systematics Requirements, Phys. Rev. D 100, 043542 (2019) [arXiv:1907.00985]
Original
1907
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Li, G.F. Smoot, B. Grossan, A.W.K. Lau, M. Bekbalanova, M. Shafiee, T. Stezelberger, Program objectives and specifications for the Ultra-Fast Astronomy observatory, Proc. SPIE 11341, 113411Y (2019) [arXiv:1908.10549]
Original
1908
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Walters, Y-Z. Ma, J. Sievers, A. Weltman, Probing Diffuse Gas with Fast Radio Bursts, Phys. Rev. D 100, 103519 (2019) [arXiv:1909.02821]
Original
1909
Cited alongside, same era.
W. Hu, G. Holder, Model-Independent Reionization Observables in the CMB, Phys. Rev. D 68, 023001 (2003) [arXiv:astro-ph/0303400]
2003
Cited alongside, same era.
M.J. Mortonson, W. Hu, Model-independent constraints on reionization from large-scale CMB polarization, ApJ 672, 737 (2008) [arXiv:0705.1132]

Then

J.M. Yao, R.N. Manchester, N. Wang, A New Electron Density Model for Estimation of Pulsar and FRB Distances, ApJ 835, 29 (2017) [arXiv:1610.09448]
Original
2017
Later among the works it cites.
E.F. Keane, The Future of Fast Radio Burst Science, Nature Ast. 2, 865 (2018) [arXiv:1811.00899]
Original
2018
Later among the works it cites.
J-P. Macquart, Probing the Universe’s baryons with fast radio bursts, Nature Ast. 2, 836 (2018) [arXiv:1811.00197]
Original
2018
Later among the works it cites.
A. Walters, A. Weltman, B.M. Gaensler, Y-Z. Ma, A. Witzemann, Future Cosmological Constraints from Fast Radio Bursts, ApJ 856, 65 (2018) [arXiv:1711.11277]
Original
2018
Later among the works it cites.
J-P. Macquart, R.D. Ekers, FRB event rate counts II – fluence, redshift and dispersion measure distributions, MNRAS 480, 4211 (2018) [arXiv:1808.00908]

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Reading the bibliography…

2020

Detecting Helium Reionization with Fast Radio Bursts

Linder, Eric V.

Understand

Fast radio bursts (FRB) probe the electron density of the universe along the path of propagation, making high redshift FRB sensitive to the helium reionization epoch.

We analyze the signal to noise with which a detection of the amplitude of reionization can be made, and its redshift, for various cases of future FRB survey samples, assessing survey characteristics including total number, redshift distribution, peak redshift, redshift depth, and number above the reionization redshift, as well as dependence on reionization redshift.
We take into account scatter in the dispersion measure due to an inhomogeneous intergalactic medium (IGM) and uncertainty in the FRB host and environment dispersion measure, as well as cosmology.
For a future survey with 500 FRB extending out to $z=5$, and a sudden reionization, the detection of helium reionization can approach the $5\sigma$ level and the reionization redshift be determined to $\sigma(z_r)\approx0.24$ in an optimistic scenario, or $2\sigma$ and $\sigma(z_r)\approx0.34$ taking into account further uncertainties on IGM fraction evolution and redshift uncertainties.