Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Measurements serve as the intermediate communication layer between the quantum world and our classical perception.
A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, “Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete,” Phys. Rev. 47
1935
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Schrödinger, “Discussion of probability relations between separated systems,” Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 31
1935
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. S. Bell, “On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox,” Physics 1
1964
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. F. Werner, “Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model,” Phys. Rev. A 40
1989
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Horodecki and P. Horodecki, “Reduction criterion of separability and limits for a class of distillation protocols,” Phys. Rev. A 59
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Barrett, “Nonsequential positive-operator-valued measurements on entangled mixed states do not always violate a bell inequality,” Phys. Rev. A 65
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. H. Zurek, “Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 75
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization (Cambridge University Press, 2004)
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. M. D’Ariano, P. Lo Presti, and P. Perinotti, “Classical randomness in quantum measurements,” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Schlosshauer, Decoherence and the quantum-to-classical transition (Springer, 2007)
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. M. Wiseman, S. J. Jones, and A. C. Doherty, “Steering, entanglement, nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98
2007
Cited alongside, same era.
M. L. Almeida, S. Pironio, J. Barrett, G. Tóth, and A. Acín, “Noise robustness of the nonlocality of entangled quantum states,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99
2007
Cited alongside, same era.
M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum computation and quantum information (Cambridge University Press, 2010)
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
C. Branciard, E. G. Cavalcanti, S. P. Walborn, V. Scarani, and H. M. Wiseman, “One-sided device-independent quantum key distribution: Security, feasibility, and the connection with steering,” Phys. Rev. A 85
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
M. T. Quintino, T. Vértesi, and N. Brunner, “Joint measurability, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering, and Bell nonlocality,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113
M. T. Quintino, T. Vértesi, D. Cavalcanti, R. Augusiak, M. Demianowicz, A. Acín, and N. Brunner, “Inequivalence of entanglement, steering, and bell nonlocality for general measurements,” Phys. Rev. A 92
2015
Later among the works it cites.
R. Gallego and L. Aolita, “Resource theory of steering,” Phys. Rev. X 5
2015
Later among the works it cites.
M. Kleinmann and A. Cabello, “Quantum correlations are stronger than all nonsignaling correlations produced by n n -outcome measurements,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117
2016
Later among the works it cites.
D. Cavalcanti and P. Skrzypczyk, “Quantum steering: a review with focus on semidefinite programming,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 80
2017
Later among the works it cites.
M. Kleinmann, T. Vértesi, and A. Cabello, “Proposed experiment to test fundamentally binary theories,” Phys. Rev. A 96
2017
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
T. Moroder, O. Gittsovich, M. Huber, and O. Gühne, “Steering bound entangled states: A counterexample to the stronger Peres conjecture,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
T. Vértesi and N. Brunner, “Disproving the Peres conjecture by showing Bell nonlocality from bound entanglement,” Nat. Commun. 5
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Uola, T. Moroder, and O. Gühne, “Joint measurability of generalized measurements implies classicality,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Uola, C. Budroni, O. Gühne, and J.-P. Pellonpää, “A one-to-one mapping between steering and joint measurability problems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Jevtic, M. J. W. Hall, M. R. Anderson, M. Zwierz, and H. M. Wiseman, “Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering and the steering ellipsoid,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 32
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Supplementary matterials
Cited in the paper.
H. C. Nguyen and T. Vu, “Nonseparability and steerability of two-qubit states from the geometry of steering outcomes,” Phys. Rev. A 94
Cited in the paper.
X.-M. Hu, B.-H. Liu, Y. Guo, G.-Y. Xiang, Y.-F. Huang, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, M. Kleinmann, T. Vértesi, and A. Cabello, “Observation of stronger-than-binary correlations with entangled photonic qutrits,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120
2018
Later among the works it cites.
H. C. Nguyen, A. Milne, T. Vu, and S. Jevtic, “Quantum steering with positive operator valued measures,” J. Phys. A 51
2018
Later among the works it cites.
H. C. Nguyen, H. V. Nguyen, and O. Gühne, “Geometry of Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen correlations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122
2019
Later among the works it cites.
2019
Later among the works it cites.
R. Uola, A. C. S. Costa, H. C. Nguyen, and O. Gühne, “Quantum steering,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 92
2020
Closest in time.