Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Predicting compound-protein affinity is critical for accelerating drug discovery.
Weisfeiler, B.; Lehman, A. A. A reduction of a graph to a canonical form and an algebra arising during this reduction. Nauchno-Technicheskaya Informatsia 1968
1968
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bohacek, R. S.; McMartin, C.; Guida, W. C. The art and practice of structure-based drug design: A molecular modeling perspective. Medicinal Research Reviews 1996
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
Brzozowski, A. M.; Pike, A. C.; Dauter, Z.; Hubbard, R. E.; Bonn, T.; Engström, O.; Öhman, L.; Greene, G. L.; Gustafsson, J.-Å.; Carlquist, M. Molecular basis of agonism and antagonism in the oestrogen receptor. Nature 1997
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
Wlodawer, A.; Vondrasek, J. Inhibitors of HIV-1 protease: a major success of structure-assisted drug design. Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure 1998
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
Berman, H. M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T. N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I. N.; Bourne, P. E. The protein data bank. Nucleic acids research 2000
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
Brik, A.; Wong, C.-H. HIV-1 protease: mechanism and drug discovery. Organic & biomolecular chemistry 2003
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Congreve, M.; Murray, C. W.; Blundell, T. L. Keynote review: Structural biology and drug discovery. Drug discovery today 2005
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Cheng, J.; Randall, A. Z.; Sweredoski, M. J.; Baldi, P. SCRATCH: a protein structure and structural feature prediction server. Nucleic acids research 2005
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Liu, T.; Lin, Y.; Wen, X.; Jorissen, R. N.; Gilson, M. K. BindingDB: a web-accessible database of experimentally determined protein–ligand binding affinities. Nucleic acids research 2006
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Gilson, M. K.; Zhou, H.-X. Calculation of protein-ligand binding affinities. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2007
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Dill, K.; Bromberg, S. Molecular driving forces: statistical thermodynamics in biology, chemistry, physics, and nanoscience ; Garland Science, 2012
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Magnan, C. N.; Baldi, P. SSpro/ACCpro 5: almost perfect prediction of protein secondary structure and relative solvent accessibility using profiles, machine learning and structural similarity. Bioinformatics 2014
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ponomarenko, E. A.; Poverennaya, E. V.; Ilgisonis, E. V.; Pyatnitskiy, M. A.; Kopylov, A. T.; Zgoda, V. G.; Lisitsa, A. V.; Archakov, A. I. The Size of the Human Proteome: The Width and Depth. Int J Anal Chem 2016
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Lu, J.; Yang, J.; Batra, D.; Parikh, D. Hierarchical question-image co-attention for visual question answering. Advances In Neural Information Processing Systems. 2016; pp 289–297
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Choi, E.; Bahadori, M. T.; Sun, J.; Kulas, J.; Schuetz, A.; Stewart, W. Retain: An interpretable predictive model for healthcare using reverse time attention mechanism. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2016; pp 3504–3512
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Lu, C.; Krishna, R.; Bernstein, M.; Fei-Fei, L. Visual relationship detection with language priors. European Conference on Computer Vision. 2016; pp 852–869
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Battaglia, P.; Pascanu, R.; Lai, M.; Rezende, D. J., et al. Interaction networks for learning about objects, relations and physics. Advances in neural information processing systems. 2016; pp 4502–4510
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Yang, Z.; Yang, D.; Dyer, C.; He, X.; Smola, A.; Hovy, E. Hierarchical attention networks for document classification. Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2016; pp 1480–1489
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
2018
Later among the works it cites.
Gao, K. Y.; Fokoue, A.; Luo, H.; Iyengar, A.; Dey, S.; Zhang, P. Interpretable Drug Target Prediction Using Deep Neural Representation. IJCAI. 2018; pp 3371–3377
2018
Later among the works it cites.
Kim, S.; Chen, J.; Cheng, T.; Gindulyte, A.; He, J.; He, S.; Li, Q.; Shoemaker, B. A.; Thiessen, P. A.; Yu, B., et al. PubChem 2019 update: improved access to chemical data. Nucleic acids research 2018
2018
Later among the works it cites.
Laskowski, R. A.; Jabłońska, J.; Pravda, L.; Vařeková, R. S.; Thornton, J. M. PDBsum: Structural summaries of PDB entries. Protein Science 2018
2018
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Wang, Z.; Chang, S.; Yang, Y.; Liu, D.; Huang, T. S. Studying very low resolution recognition using deep networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2016; pp 4792–4800
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Santos, R.; Ursu, O.; Gaulton, A.; Bento, A. P.; Donadi, R. S.; Bologa, C. G.; Karlsson, A.; Al-Lazikani, B.; Hersey, A.; Oprea, T. I., et al. A comprehensive map of molecular drug targets. Nature reviews Drug discovery 2017
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Das, A.; Agrawal, H.; Zitnick, L.; Parikh, D.; Batra, D. Human attention in visual question answering: Do humans and deep networks look at the same regions? Computer Vision and Image Understanding 2017
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Doshi-Velez, F.; Kim, B. Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning. 2017
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Santoro, A.; Raposo, D.; Barrett, D. G.; Malinowski, M.; Pascanu, R.; Battaglia, P.; Lillicrap, T. A simple neural network module for relational reasoning. Advances in neural information processing systems. 2017; pp 4967–4976
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Hoshen, Y. Vain: Attentional multi-agent predictive modeling. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2017; pp 2701–2711
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Wang, S.; Sun, S.; Li, Z.; Zhang, R.; Xu, J. Accurate de novo prediction of protein contact map by ultra-deep learning model. PLoS computational biology 2017
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
2018
Later among the works it cites.
2018
Later among the works it cites.
Torng, W.; Altman, R. B. Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Predicting Drug-Target Interactions. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2019
2019
Closest in time.
Lim, J.; Ryu, S.; Park, K.; Choe, Y. J.; Ham, J.; Kim, W. Y. Predicting Drug–Target Interaction Using a Novel Graph Neural Network with 3D Structure-Embedded Graph Representation. Journal of chemical information and modeling 2019
2019
Closest in time.
Li, X.; Yan, X.; Gu, Q.; Zhou, H.; Wu, D.; Xu, J. DeepChemStable: Chemical Stability Prediction with an Attention-Based Graph Convolution Network. Journal of chemical information and modeling 2019
2019
Closest in time.
Uddin, M. R.; Mahbub, S.; Rahman, M. S.; Bayzid, M. S. SAINT: Self-Attention Augmented Inception-Inside-Inception Network Improves Protein Secondary Structure Prediction. bioRxiv 2019
2019
Closest in time.
McCloskey, K.; Taly, A.; Monti, F.; Brenner, M. P.; Colwell, L. J. Using attribution to decode binding mechanism in neural network models for chemistry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2019
2019
Closest in time.
2019
Closest in time.
RDKit: Open-source cheminformatics. http://www.rdkit.org , [Online; accessed: april 2019]
2019
Closest in time.
Lee, I.; Keum, J.; Nam, H. DeepConv-DTI: Prediction of drug-target interactions via deep learning with convolution on protein sequences. PLoS computational biology 2019
2019
Closest in time.
Cortes-Ciriano, I.; Bender, A. KekuleScope: prediction of cancer cell line sensitivity and compound potency using convolutional neural networks trained on compound images. Journal of Cheminformatics 2019
2019
Closest in time.
Xu, K.; Ba, J.; Kiros, R.; Cho, K.; Courville, A.; Salakhudinov, R.; Zemel, R.; Bengio, Y. Show, attend and tell: Neural image caption generation with visual attention. International conference on machine learning. 2015; pp 2048–2057
2057
Closest in time.