Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
To make precise the sense in which the operational predictions of quantum theory conflict with a classical worldview, it is necessary to articulate a notion of classicality within an operational framework.
J. S. Bell, “On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox,”
1964
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Kochen and E. Specker, “The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics,”
1967
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. G. Beltrametti and S. Bugajski, “A classical extension of quantum mechanics,”
1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Cabello and G. García-Alcaine, “Proposed Experimental Tests of the Bell-Kochen-Specker Theorem,”
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Cabello, “Kochen–Specker theorem and experimental test on hidden variables,”
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Simon, M. Żukowski, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, “Feasible “Kochen-Specker” Experiment with Single Particles,”
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Simon, i. c. v. Brukner, and A. Zeilinger, “Hidden-Variable Theorems for Real Experiments,”
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Hardy, “Quantum Theory From Five Reasonable Axioms,”
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
J.-Å. Larsson, “A Kochen-Specker inequality,”
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. W. Spekkens, “Contextuality for preparations, transformations, and unsharp measurements,”
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Barrett, “Information processing in generalized probabilistic theories,”
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. W. Spekkens, “Evidence for the epistemic view of quantum states: A toy theory,”
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Cabello, S. Filipp, H. Rauch, and Y. Hasegawa, “Proposed Experiment for Testing Quantum Contextuality with Neutrons,”
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. W. Spekkens, “Negativity and Contextuality are Equivalent Notions of Nonclassicality,”
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Ferrie and J. Emerson, “Frame representations of quantum mechanics and the necessity of negativity in quasi-probability representations,”
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. W. Spekkens, D. H. Buzacott, A. J. Keehn, B. Toner, and G. J. Pryde, “Preparation Contextuality Powers Parity-Oblivious Multiplexing,”
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Chiribella, G. M. D’Ariano, and P. Perinotti, “Probabilistic theories with purification,”
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. J. Hoban, E. T. Campbell, K. Loukopoulos, and D. E. Browne, “Non-adaptive measurement-based quantum computation and multi-party Bell inequalities,”
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Hardy, “Reformulating and reconstructing quantum theory,”
2011
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Raussendorf, “Contextuality in measurement-based quantum computation,”
2013
Cited alongside, same era.
P. Janotta and R. Lal, “Generalized probabilistic theories without the no-restriction hypothesis,”
2013
Cited alongside, same era.
N. Brunner, D. Cavalcanti, S. Pironio, V. Scarani, and S. Wehner, “Bell nonlocality,”
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
M. F. Pusey, “Anomalous Weak Values Are Proofs of Contextuality,”
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Howard, J. Wallman, V. Veitch, and J. Emerson, “Contextuality supplies the ‘magic’ for quantum computation,”
2017
Later among the works it cites.
D. Schmid and R. W. Spekkens, “Contextual Advantage for State Discrimination,”
2018
Later among the works it cites.
A. B. Sainz, Y. Guryanova, A. Acín, and M. Navascués, “Almost-quantum correlations violate the no-restriction hypothesis,”
2018
Later among the works it cites.
R. Kunjwal, M. Lostaglio, and M. F. Pusey, “Anomalous weak values and contextuality: Robustness, tightness, and imaginary parts,”
2019
Closest in time.
D. Saha, P. Horodecki, and M. Pawłowski, “State independent contextuality advances one-way communication,”
2019
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
P. Janotta and R. Lal, “Non-locality in theories without the no-restriction hypothesis,”
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Kunjwal and R. W. Spekkens, “From the Kochen-Specker Theorem to Noncontextuality Inequalities without Assuming Determinism,”
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
M. F. Pusey, “The robust noncontextuality inequalities in the simplest scenario,”
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
M. D. Mazurek, M. F. Pusey, R. Kunjwal, K. J. Resch, and R. W. Spekkens, “An experimental test of noncontextuality without unphysical idealizations,”
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Kunjwal, “Contextuality beyond the Kochen-Specker theorem,”
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Chailloux, I. Kerenidis, S. Kundu, and J. Sikora, “Optimal bounds for parity-oblivious random access codes,”
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
2019
Closest in time.
2019
Closest in time.
O. Magidor, “Category Mistakes,”
2019
Closest in time.
2019
Closest in time.
R. Kunjwal, “Beyond the Cabello-Severini-Winter framework: Making sense of contextuality without sharpness of measurements,”
2019
Closest in time.
2020
Closest in time.
F. Shahandeh, “Contextuality of general probabilistic theories,”
2020
Closest in time.
S. N. Filippov, S. Gudder, T. Heinosaari, and L. Leppäjärvi, “Operational restrictions in general probabilistic theories,”
2020
Closest in time.
V. J. Wright and S. Weigert, “General Probabilistic Theories with a Gleason-type Theorem,”
2020
Closest in time.
R. Kunjwal, “Hypergraph framework for irreducible noncontextuality inequalities from logical proofs of the Kochen-Specker theorem,”
2020
Closest in time.
2020
Closest in time.