Built on

A. Bernamonti, F. Galli, J. Hernandez, R. C. Myers, S. M. Ruan and J. Simón, “First Law of Holographic Complexity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123
Original
1903
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. A. Camargo, M. P. Heller, R. Jefferson and J. Knaute, “Path integral optimization as circuit complexity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123
Original
1904
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Ge and G. Policastro, “Circuit Complexity and 2D Bosonisation,” arXiv:1904.03003 [hep-th]
Original
1904
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Sato and K. Watanabe, “Does Boundary Distinguish Complexities?,” arXiv:1908.11094 [hep-th]
Original
1908
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Auzzi, G. Nardelli, F. I. Schaposnik Massolo, G. Tallarita and N. Zenoni, “On volume subregion complexity in Vaidya spacetime,” arXiv:1908.10832 [hep-th]
Original
1908
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Caceres, S. Chapman, J. D. Couch, J. P. Hernandez, R. C. Myers and S. M. Ruan, “Complexity of Mixed States in QFT and Holography,” arXiv:1909.10557 [hep-th]
Original
1909
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Nagasaki, H. Tanida and S. Yamaguchi, “Holographic Interface-Particle Potential,” JHEP 1201
Original
1927
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. W. York, Jr., “Role of conformal three geometry in the dynamics of gravitation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 28
1972
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 15
1977
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. E. Knuth et al., “Concrete mathematics,” Adison Wesley
1989
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Hayward, “Gravitational action for space-times with nonsmooth boundaries,” Phys. Rev. D 47
1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Brill and G. Hayward, “Is the gravitational action additive?,” Phys. Rev. D 50
1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. Kac and P. Cheung, “Euler-Maclaurin formula,” In Quantum Calculus
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. A. Nielsen, M. R. Dowling, M. Gu, and A. C. Doherty, “Quantum computation as geometry,” Science 311(5764)
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, “Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. R. Dowling and M. A. Nielsen, “The geometry of quantum computation,” Quantum Information & Computation 8(10)
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Takayanagi, “Holographic Dual of BCFT,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 107
Original
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Fujita, T. Takayanagi and E. Tonni, “Aspects of AdS/BCFT,” JHEP 1111
Original
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Nozaki, T. Takayanagi and T. Ugajin, “Central Charges for BCFTs and Holography,” JHEP 1206
Original
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Calabrese, J. Cardy and E. Tonni, “Entanglement negativity in extended systems: A field theoretical approach,” J. Stat. Mech. 1302
Original
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Stanford and L. Susskind, “Complexity and Shock Wave Geometries,” Phys. Rev. D 90
Original
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Alishahiha, “Holographic Complexity,” Phys. Rev. D 92
Original
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. L. F. Barbon and J. Martin-Garcia, “Holographic Complexity Of Cold Hyperbolic Black Holes,” JHEP 1511
Original
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

L. Susskind, “Computational Complexity and Black Hole Horizons,” [Fortsch. Phys. 64
Original
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
A. R. Brown, D. A. Roberts, L. Susskind, B. Swingle and Y. Zhao, “Holographic Complexity Equals Bulk Action?,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116
Original
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
A. R. Brown, D. A. Roberts, L. Susskind, B. Swingle and Y. Zhao, “Complexity, action, and black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 93
Original
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
K. Parattu, S. Chakraborty, B. R. Majhi and T. Padmanabhan, “A Boundary Term for the Gravitational Action with Null Boundaries,” Gen. Rel. Grav. 48
Original
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
L. Lehner, R. C. Myers, E. Poisson and R. D. Sorkin, “Gravitational action with null boundaries,” Phys. Rev. D 94

Then

S. Chapman, H. Marrochio and R. C. Myers, “Holographic complexity in Vaidya spacetimes. Part II,” JHEP 1806
Original
2018
Later among the works it cites.
S. Chapman, H. Marrochio and R. C. Myers, “Holographic complexity in Vaidya spacetimes. Part I,” JHEP 1806
Original
2018
Later among the works it cites.
A. Bernamonti, F. Galli, R. C. Myers and J. Oppenheim, “Holographic second laws of black hole thermodynamics,” JHEP 1807
Original
2018
Later among the works it cites.
Z. Y. Fan and M. Guo, “On the Noether charge and the gravity duals of quantum complexity,” JHEP 1808
Original
2018
Later among the works it cites.
J. Couch, S. Eccles, T. Jacobson and P. Nguyen, “Holographic Complexity and Volume,” JHEP 1811

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Reading the bibliography…

2019

Complexity in the presence of a boundary

Braccia, Paolo, Cotrone, Aldo L., Tonni, Erik

Understand

The effects of a boundary on the circuit complexity are studied in two dimensional theories.

The analysis is performed in the holographic realization of a conformal field theory with a boundary by employing different proposals for the dual of the complexity, including the "Complexity = Volume" (CV) and "Complexity = Action" (CA) prescriptions, and in the harmonic chain with Dirichlet boundary conditions.
In all the cases considered except for CA, the boundary introduces a subleading logarithmic divergence in the expansion of the complexity as the UV cutoff vanishes.
Holographic subregion complexity is also explored in the CV case, finding that it can change discontinuously under continuous variations of the configuration of the subregion.