Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Extensive research has recently shown that recurrent neural language models are able to process a wide range of grammatical phenomena.
A value for n-person games
Lloyd S. Shapley. 1953 · 1953
Earlier work this paper cites.
Long Short-Term Memory
Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997 · 1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
On pixel-wise explanations for non-linear classifier decisions by layer-wise relevance propagation
Sebastian Bach, Alexander Binder, Grégoire Montavon, Frederick Klauschen, Klaus-Robert Müller, and Wojciech Samek. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Understanding lstm networks
Christopher Olah. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Exploring the limits of language modeling
Rafal Józefowicz, Oriol Vinyals, Mike Schuster, Noam Shazeer, and Yonghui Wu. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Assessing the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Syntax-Sensitive Dependencies
Tal Linzen, Emmanuel Dupoux, and Yoav Goldberg. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Explaining recurrent neural network predictions in sentiment analysis
Leila Arras, Grégoire Montavon, Klaus-Robert Müller, and Wojciech Samek. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
A unified approach to interpreting model predictions
Scott M. Lundberg and Su-In Lee. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Under the Hood: Using Diagnostic Classifiers to Investigate and Improve how Language Models Track Agreement Information
Mario Giulianelli, Jack Harding, Florian Mohnert, Dieuwke Hupkes, and Willem Zuidema. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Colorless green recurrent networks dream hierarchically
Kristina Gulordava, Piotr Bojanowski, Edouard Grave, Tal Linzen, and Marco Baroni. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Do Language Models Understand Anything? On the Ability of LSTMs to Understand Negative Polarity Items
Jaap Jumelet and Dieuwke Hupkes. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Targeted Syntactic Evaluation of Language Models
Rebecca Marvin and Tal Linzen. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Beyond word importance: Contextual decomposition to extract interactions from lstms
W. James Murdoch, Peter J. Liu, and Bin Yu. 2018 · 2018
Explaining deep neural networks with a polynomial time algorithm for shapley values approximation
Marco Ancona, Cengiz Öztireli, and Markus Gross. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Analysis methods in neural language processing: A survey
Yonatan Belinkov and James Glass. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Lipstick on a pig: Debiasing methods cover up systematic gender biases in word embeddings but do not remove them
Hila Gonen and Yoav Goldberg. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
diagnnose: A neural net analysis library
Jaap Jumelet and Dieuwke Hupkes. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
The emergence of number and syntax units in LSTM language models
Yair Lakretz, German Kruszewski, Theo Desbordes, Dieuwke Hupkes, Stanislas Dehaene, and Marco Baroni. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Gradient-Based Vs. Propagation-Based Explanations: An Axiomatic Comparison , pages 253–265. Springer International Publishing, Cham
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
Evaluating neural network explanation methods using hybrid documents and morphosyntactic agreement
Nina Poerner, Benjamin Roth, and Hinrich Schütze. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
What do RNN Language Models Learn about Filler-Gap Dependencies?
Ethan Wilcox, Roger Levy, Takashi Morita, and Richard Futrell. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Gender bias in coreference resolution: Evaluation and debiasing methods
Jieyu Zhao, Tianlu Wang, Mark Yatskar, Vicente Ordonez, and Kai-Wei Chang. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Grégoire Montavon. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Hierarchical interpretations for neural network predictions
Chandan Singh, W. James Murdoch, and Bin Yu. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.