Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Understanding and reasoning about physics is an important ability of intelligent agents.
Individual comparisons by ranking methods
F. Wilcoxon · 1945
Earlier work this paper cites.
Procedures as a representation for data in a computer program for understanding natural language
T. Winograd · 1971
Earlier work this paper cites.
Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: Naive beliefs about the motion of objects
M. McCloskey, A. Caramazza, and B. Green · 1980
Earlier work this paper cites.
Naive physics: The curvilinear impetus principle and its role in interactions with moving objects
M. McCloskey and D. Kohl · 1983
Earlier work this paper cites.
Intuitive physics: the straight-down belief and its origin
M. McCloskey, A. Washburn, and L. Felch · 1983
Earlier work this paper cites.
Tool use in capuchin monkeys: Distinguishing between performing and understanding
E. Visalberghi and L. Trinca · 1989
Earlier work this paper cites.
Lack of comprehension of cause effect relations in tool-using capuchin monkeys (cebus apella)
E. Visalberghi and L. Limongelli · 1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
Acting and understanding: Tool use revisited through the minds of capuchin monkeys
E. Visalberghi and L. Limongelli · 1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
Folk physics for apes: The chimpanzee’s theory of how the world works
D. Povinelli · 2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
Physical reasoning
E. Davis · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Running the table: An AI for computer billiards
M. Smith · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
The epoch-greedy algorithm for contextual multi-armed bandits
J. Langford and T. Zhang · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Tubes, tables and traps: great apes solve two functionally equivalent trap tasks but show no evidence of transfer across tasks
G. Martin-Ordas, J. Call, and F. Colmenares · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Do new caledonian crows solve physical problems through causal reasoning?
A. H. Taylor, G. R. Hunt, F. S. Medina, and R. D. Gray · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Rooks use stones to raise the water level to reach a floating worm
C. D. Bird and N. J. Emery · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Gaussian process optimization in the bandit setting: No regret and experimental design
N. Srinivas, A. Krause, S. M. Kakade, and M. Seeger · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
A new learning paradigm: Learning using privileged information
V. Vapnik and A. Vashist · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
A contextual-bandit approach to personalized news article recommendation
L. Li, W. Chu, J. Langford, and R. E. Schapire · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
An empirical evaluation of thompson sampling
O. Chapelle and L. Li · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Contextual bandits with linear payoff functions
W. Chu, L. Li, L. Reyzin, and R. Schapire · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Physical cognition and tool-use: performance of darwin’s finches in the two-trap tube task
I. Teschke and S. Tebbich · 2011
Cited alongside, same era.
How do children solve aesop’s fable?
L. G. Cheke, E. Loissel, and N. S. Clayton · 2012
Cited alongside, same era.
Mujoco: A physics engine for model-based control
E. Todorov, T. Erez, and Y. Tassa · 2012
Cited alongside, same era.
Simulation as an engine of physical scene understanding
P. W. Battaglia, J. B. Hamrick, and J. B. Tenenbaum · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
Using the aesop’s fable paradigm to investigate causal understanding of water displacement by new caledonian crows
S. A. Jelbert, A. H. Taylor, L. G. Cheke, N. S. Clayton, and R. D. Gray · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Prediction under uncertainty with error-encoding networks
M. Henaff, J. Zhao, and Y. LeCun · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Learning to reason: End-to-end module networks for visual question answering
R. Hu, J. Andreas, M. Rohrbach, T. Darrell, and K. Saenko · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Visual stability prediction and its application to manipulation
W. Li, A. Leonardis, and M. Fritz · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Generalizable features from unsupervised learning
M. Mirza, A. Courville, and Y. Bengio · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
A simple neural network module for relational reasoning
A. Santoro, D. Raposo, D. Barrett, M. Malinowski, R. Pascanu, P. Battaglia, and T. Lillicrap · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Proximal policy optimization algorithms
J. Schulman, F. Wolski, P. Dhariwal, A. Radford, and O. Klimov · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
D. P. Kingma and J. Ba · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Causal discovery with continuous additive noise models
J. Peters, J. Mooij, D. Janzing, and B. Schölkopf · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
VQA: Visual question answering
S. Antol, A. Agrawal, J. Lu, M. Mitchell, D. Batra, C. Lawrence Zitnick, and D. Parikh · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning
V. Mnih, K. Kavukcuoglu, D. Silver, A. A. Rusu, J. Veness, M. G. Bellemare, A. Graves, M. Riedmiller, A. K. Fidjeland, G. Ostrovski, S. Petersen, C. Beattie, A. Sadik, I. Antonoglou, H. King, D. Kumaran, D. Wierstra, S. Legg, and D. Hassabis · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Galileo: Perceiving physical object properties by integrating a physics engine with deep learning
J. Wu, I. Yildirim, J. J. Lim, B. Freeman, and J. Tenenbaum · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Unsupervised learning for physical interaction through video prediction
C. Finn, I. Goodfellow, and S. Levine · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Deep residual learning for image recognition
K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Learning to see physics via visual de-animation
J. Wu, E. Lu, P. Kohli, B. Freeman, and J. Tenenbaum · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Shapestacks: Learning vision-based physical intuition for generalised object stacking
O. Groth, F. B. Fuchs, I. Posner, and A. Vedaldi · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Invariant causal prediction for nonlinear models
C. Heinze-Deml, J. Peters, and N. Meinshausen · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Compositional attention networks for machine reasoning
D. A. Hudson and C. D. Manning · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Film: Visual reasoning with a general conditioning layer
E. Perez, F. Strub, H. de Vries, V. Dumoulin, and A. Courville · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Probing physics knowledge using tools from developmental psychology
L. Piloto, A. Weinstein, A. Ahuja, M. Mirza, G. Wayne, D. Amos, C.-c. Hung, and M. Botvinick · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Intphys: A framework and benchmark for visual intuitive physics reasoning
R. Riochet, M. Y. Castro, M. Bernard, A. Lerer, R. Fergus, V. Izard, and E. Dupoux · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
C. Riquelme, G. Tucker, and J. Snoek · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Building generalizable agents with a realistic and rich 3D environment
Y. Wu, Y. Wu, G. Gkioxari, and Y. Tian · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
The tools challenge: Rapid trial-and-error learning in physical problem solving
K. Allen, K. Smith, and J. Tenenbaum · 2019
Closest in time.
Reasoning about physical interactions with object-oriented prediction and planning
M. Janner, S. Levine, W. T. Freeman, J. B. Tenenbaum, C. Finn, and J. Wu · 2019
Closest in time.
The neuro-symbolic concept learner: Interpreting scenes, words, and sentences from natural supervision
J. Mao, C. Gan, P. Kohli, J. Tenenbaum, and J. Wu · 2019
Closest in time.
Habitat: A platform for embodied ai research
M. Savva, A. Kadian, O. Maksymets, Y. Zhao, E. Wijmans, B. Jain, J. Straub, J. Liu, V. Koltun, J. Malik, D. Parikh, and D. Batra · 2019
Closest in time.