Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
We present the Visually Grounded Neural Syntax Learner (VG-NSL), an approach for learning syntactic representations and structures without any explicit supervision.
Perplexity—a measure of the difficulty of speech recognition tasks
Fred Jelinek, Robert L Mercer, Lalit R Bahl, and James K Baker. 1977 · 1977
Earlier work this paper cites.
The MRC psycholinguistic database
Max Coltheart. 1981 · 1981
Earlier work this paper cites.
Language Learnability and Language Development
Steven Pinker. 1984 · 1984
Earlier work this paper cites.
Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography
Kenneth Ward Church and Patrick Hanks. 1990 · 1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
Simple statistical gradient-following algorithms for connectionist reinforcement learning
Ronald J. Williams. 1992 · 1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn treebank
Mitchell Marcus, Beatrice Santorini, and Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz. 1993 · 1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bracketing guidelines for treebank II style Penn treebank project
Ann Bies, Mark Ferguson, Karen Katz, Robert MacIntyre, Victoria Tredinnick, Grace Kim, Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz, and Britta Schasberger. 1995 · 1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
Long short-term memory
Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997 · 1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
Evalb bracket scoring program
Satoshi Sekine and Michael Collins. 1997 · 1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
The Syntactic Process
Mark Steedman. 2000 · 2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
The Atoms of Language: The Mind’s Hidden Rules of Grammar
Mark C. Baker. 2001 · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
A generative constituent-context model for improved grammar induction
Dan Klein and Christopher D. Manning. 2002 · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Corpus-based induction of syntactic structure: Models of dependency and constituency
Dan Klein and Christopher D. Manning. 2004 · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Natural language grammar induction with a generative constituent-context model
Dan Klein and Christopher D. Manning. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Learning overhypotheses
Charles K. Kemp, Amy Perfors, and Joshua B. Tenenbaum. 2006 · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Annealing structural bias in multilingual weighted grammar induction
Noah A. Smith and Jason Eisner. 2006 · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Shared logistic normal distributions for soft parameter tying in unsupervised grammar induction
Shay Cohen and Noah A. Smith. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Dependency grammar induction via bitext projection constraints
Kuzman Ganchev, Jennifer Gillenwater, and Ben Taskar. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Unsupervised multilingual grammar induction
Benjamin Snyder, Tahira Naseem, and Regina Barzilay. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
An efficient algorithm for easy-first non-directional dependency parsing
Yoav Goldberg and Michael Elhadad. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
From baby steps to leapfrog: How “less is more” in unsupervised dependency parsing
Valentin I. Spitkovsky, Hiyan Alshawi, and Daniel Jurafsky. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Unsupervised structure prediction with non-parallel multilingual guidance
Shay B. Cohen, Dipanjan Das, and Noah A. Smith. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Multimodal deep learning
Jiquan Ngiam, Aditya Khosla, Mingyu Kim, Juhan Nam, Honglak Lee, and Andrew Y. Ng. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Simple unsupervised grammar induction from raw rext with cascaded finite state models
Elias Ponvert, Jason Baldridge, and Katrin Erk. 2011 · 2011
Cited alongside, same era.
Unsupervised dependency parsing without gold part-of-speech tags
Valentin I. Spitkovsky, Hiyan Alshawi, Angel X. Chang, and Daniel Jurafsky. 2011 · 2011
Cited alongside, same era.
Literal and metaphorical sense identification through concrete and abstract context
Peter D. Turney, Yair Neuman, Dan Assaf, and Yohai Cohen. 2011 · 2011
Cited alongside, same era.
Grounded models of semantic representation
Carina Silberer and Mirella Lapata. 2012 · 2012
Cited alongside, same era.
Concreteness and corpora: A theoretical and practical study
Felix Hill, Douwe Kiela, and Anna Korhonen. 2013 · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas
Visual relationship detection with language priors
Cewu Lu, Ranjay Krishna, Michael Bernstein, and Li Fei-Fei. 2016 · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
Exploring multi-modal text+image models to distinguish between abstract and concrete nouns
Sai Abishek Bhaskar, Maximilian Köper, Sabine Schulte Im Walde, and Diego Frassinelli. 2017 · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Findings of the second shared task on multimodal machine translation and multilingual image description
Desmond Elliott, Stella Frank, Loïc Barrault, Fethi Bougares, and Lucia Specia. 2017 · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Dependency grammar induction with neural lexicalization and big training data
Wenjuan Han, Yong Jiang, and Kewei Tu. 2017 · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Categorical reparameterization with Gumbel-softmax
Eric Jang, Shixiang Gu, and Ben Poole. 2017 · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Visually grounded meaning representations
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Marc Brysbaert, Amy Beth Warriner, and Victor Kuperman. 2014 · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Multi-modal models for concrete and abstract concept meaning
Felix Hill, Roi Reichart, and Anna Korhonen. 2014 · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Improving multi-modal representations using image dispersion: Why less is sometimes more
Douwe Kiela, Felix Hill, Anna Korhonen, and Stephen Clark. 2014 · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Unifying visual-semantic embeddings with multimodal neural language models
Ryan Kiros, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and Richard S. Zemel. 2014 · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Microsoft COCO: Common objects in context
Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge Belongie, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, Piotr Dollár, and C. Lawrence Zitnick. 2014 · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Seeing what you’re told: Sentence-guided activity recognition in video
N. Siddharth, Andrei Barbu, and Jeffrey Mark Siskind. 2014 · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
From image descriptions to visual denotations: New similarity metrics for semantic inference over event descriptions
Peter Young, Alice Lai, Micah Hodosh, and Julia Hockenmaier. 2014 · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Carina Silberer, Vittorio Ferrari, and Mirella Lapata. 2017 · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Learning to compose words into sentences with reinforcement learning
Dani Yogatama, Phil Blunsom, Chris Dyer, Edward Grefenstette, and Wang Ling. 2017 · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Learning to compose task-specific tree structures
Jihun Choi, Kang Min Yoo, and Sang-goo Lee. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
VSE++: Improving visual-semantic embeddings with hard negatives
Fartash Faghri, David J. Fleet, Jamie Ryan Kiros, and Sanja Fidler. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Word learning and the acquisition of syntactic–semantic overhypotheses
Jon Gauthier, Roger Levy, and Joshua B. Tenenbaum. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Quantifying the visual concreteness of words and topics in multimodal datasets
Jack Hessel, David Mimno, and Lillian Lee. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Constituency parsing with a self-attentive encoder
Nikita Kitaev and Dan Klein. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Visual coreference resolution in visual dialog using neural module networks
Satwik Kottur, José MF Moura, Devi Parikh, Dhruv Batra, and Marcus Rohrbach. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Latent tree learning with differentiable parsers: Shift-reduce rarsing and chart parsing
Jean Maillard and Stephen Clark. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Grammar induction with neural language models: An unsual replication
Phu Mon Htut, Kyunghyun Cho, and Samuel R. Bowman. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Do latent tree learning models identify meaningful structure in sentences?
Adina Williams, Andrew Drozdov, and Samuel R. Bowman. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Unsupervised latent tree induction with deep inside-outside recursive autoencoders
Andrew Drozdov, Pat Verga, Mohit Yadav, Mohit Iyyer, and Andrew McCallum. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Cooperative learning of disjoint syntax and semantics
Serhii Havrylov, Germán Kruszewski, and Armand Joulin. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Unsupervised recurrent neural network grammars
Yoon Kim, Alexander M Rush, Lei Yu, Adhiguna Kuncoro, Chris Dyer, and Gábor Melis. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
The neuro-symbolic concept learner: Interpreting scenes, words, and sentences from natural supervision
Jiayuan Mao, Chuang Gan, Pushmeet Kohli, Joshua B Tenenbaum, and Jiajun Wu. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Ordered neurons: Integrating tree structures into recurrent neural networks
Yikang Shen, Shawn Tan, Alessandro Sordoni, and Aaron Courville. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Learning to embed sentences using attentive recursive trees
Jiaxin Shi, Lei Hou, Juanzi Li, Zhiyuan Liu, and Hanwang Zhang. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Hao Wu, Jiayuan Mao, Yufeng Zhang, Weiwei Sun, Yuning Jiang, Lei Li, and Wei-Ying Ma. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.