Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Legal judgment prediction is the task of automatically predicting the outcome of a court case, given a text describing the case's facts.
What computers can do: Analysis and prediction of judicial decisions
Reed C Lawlor. 1963 · 1963
Earlier work this paper cites.
Legal docket classification: Where machine learning stumbles
Ramesh Nallapati and Christopher D. Manning. 2008 · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks
Xavier Glorot and Yoshua Bengio. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Quantitative legal prediction-or-how I learned to stop worrying and start preparing for the data-driven future of the legal services industry
Daniel Martin Katz. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Historical analysis of legal opinions with a sparse mixed-effects latent variable model
William Yang Wang, Elijah Mayfield, Suresh Naidu, and Jeremiah Dittmar. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
GloVe: Global vectors for word representation
Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher, and Christopher D. Manning. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Adam: A method for stochastic optimization
Diederik P. Kingma and Jim Ba. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bargaining in the shadow of big data
Dru Stevenson and Nicholas J Wagoner. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a Natural Language Processing perspective
Nikolaos Aletras et al. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Hierarchical attention networks for document classification
Zichao Yang et al. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Legal NERC with ontologies, Wikipedia and curriculum learning
Cristian Cardellino, Milagro Teruel, Laura Alonso Alemany, and Serena Villata. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Extracting contract elements
Ilias Chalkidis, Ion Androutsopoulos, and Achilleas Michos. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning
Finale Doshi-Velez and Ben Kim. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Learning to predict charges for criminal cases with legal basis
Bingfeng Luo, Yansong Feng, Jianbo Xu, Xiang Zhang, and Dongyan Zhao. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Predicting the law area and decisions of French Supreme Court cases
Few-shot charge prediction with discriminative legal attributes
Zikun Hu, Xiang Li, Cunchao Tu, Zhiyuan Liu, and Maosong Sun. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: Looking into the crystal ball
Masha Medvedeva, Michel Vols, and Martijn Wieling. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Explainable prediction of medical codes from clinical text
James Mullenbach, Sarah Wiegreffe, Jon Duke, Jimeng Sun, and Jacob Eisenstein. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Interpretable charge predictions for criminal cases: Learning to generate court views from fact descriptions
Hai Ye, Xin Jiang, Zhunchen Luo, and Wenhan Chao. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Legal judgment prediction via topological learning
Haoxi Zhong, Guo Zhipeng, Cunchao Tu, Chaojun Xiao, Zhiyuan Liu, and Maosong Sun. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Octavia-Maria Şulea, Marcos Zampieri, Mihaela Vela, and Josef van Genabith. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Attention is all you need
Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
‘it’s reducing a human being to a percentage’: Perceptions of justice in algorithmic decisions
Reuben Binns, Max Van Kleek, Michael Veale, Ulrik Lyngs, Jun Zhao, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Obligation and prohibition extraction using hierarchical RNNs
Ilias Chalkidis, Ion Androutsopoulos, and Achilleas Michos. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Ilias Chalkidis, Emmanouil Fergadiotis, Prodromos Malakasiotis, Nikolaos Aletras, and Ion Androutsopoulos. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding
Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Attention is not explanation
Sarthak Jain and Byron C. Wallace. 2019 · 2019
Closest in time.
Show, attend and tell: Neural image caption generation with visual attention
Kelvin Xu, Jimmy Ba, Ryan Kiros, Kyunghyun Cho, Aaron Courville, Ruslan Salakhudinov, Rich Zemel, and Yoshua Bengio. 2015 · 2057
Closest in time.