Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
We consider settings in which the right notion of fairness is not captured by simple mathematical definitions (such as equality of error rates across groups), but might be more complex and nuanced and thus require elicitation from individual or collective stakeholders.
On general minimax theorems
Maurice Sion et al · 1958
Earlier work this paper cites.
Moral Perception and Particularity
Lawrence Blum · 1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
An introduction to computational learning theory
Michael J Kearns and Umesh Virkumar Vazirani · 1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
Game theory, on-line prediction and boosting
Yoav Freund and Robert E Schapire · 1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
Exponentiated gradient versus gradient descent for linear predictors
Jyrki Kivinen and Manfred K. Warmuth · 1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
Online convex programming and generalized infinitesimal gradient ascent
Martin Zinkevich · 2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
On agnostic learning of parities, monomials, and halfspaces
Vitaly Feldman, Parikshit Gopalan, Subhash Khot, and Ashok Kumar Ponnuswami · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Is there an ethics of algorithms?
Felicitas Kraemer, Kees van Overveld, and Martin Peterson · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fairness through awareness
Cynthia Dwork, Moritz Hardt, Toniann Pitassi, Omer Reingold, and Richard S. Zemel · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Agnostic learning of monomials by halfspaces is hard
Vitaly Feldman, Venkatesan Guruswami, Prasad Raghavendra, and Yi Wu · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Data preprocessing techniques for classification without discrimination
Faisal Kamiran and Toon Calders · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Learning fair representations
Rich Zemel, Yu Wu, Kevin Swersky, Toni Pitassi, and Cynthia Dwork · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Concentration of lipschitz functionals of determinantal and other strong rayleigh measures
Robin Pemantle and Yuval Peres · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Equality of opportunity in supervised learning
Moritz Hardt, Eric Price, and Nati Srebro · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Fairness in learning: Classic and contextual bandits
Matthew Joseph, Michael Kearns, Jamie H Morgenstern, and Aaron Roth · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Fairness beyond disparate treatment & disparate impact: Learning classification without disparate mistreatment
Muhammad Bilal Zafar, Isabel Valera, Manuel Gomez-Rodriguez, and Krishna P. Gummadi · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
A reductions approach to fair classification
Alekh Agarwal, Alina Beygelzimer, Miroslav Dudík, John Langford, and Hanna M. Wallach · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Moral decision making frameworks for artificial intelligence
Vincent Conitzer, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Jana Schaich Borg, Yuan Deng, and Max Kramer · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
The measure and mismeasure of fairness: A critical review of fair machine learning
Fairness and accountability design needs for algorithmic support in high-stakes public sector decision-making
Michael Veale, Max Van Kleek, and Reuben Binns · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Fairness definitions explained
Sahil Verma and Julia Rubin · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Male tennis pros confirm serena’s penalty was sexist and admit to saying worse on the court
Ariana Yaptangco · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Fair regression: Quantitative definitions and reduction-based algorithms
Alekh Agarwal, Miroslav Dudík, and Zhiwei Steven Wu · 2019
Closest in time.
Metric learning for individual fairness
C Ilvento · 2019
Closest in time.
Statistical foundations of virtual democracy
Anson Kahng, Min Kyung Lee, Ritesh Noothigattu, Ariel D. Procaccia, and Christos-Alexandros Psomas · 2019
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Sam Corbett-Davies and Sharad Goel · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Online learning with an unknown fairness metric
Stephen Gillen, Christopher Jung, Michael Kearns, and Aaron Roth · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Preventing fairness gerrymandering: Auditing and learning for subgroup fairness
Michael J. Kearns, Seth Neel, Aaron Roth, and Zhiwei Steven Wu · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Fairness through computationally-bounded awareness
Michael Kim, Omer Reingold, and Guy Rothblum · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Translation tutorial: 21 fairness definitions and their politics
Arvind Narayanan · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
How to use heuristics for differential privacy
Seth Neel, Aaron Roth, and Zhiwei Steven Wu · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
A voting-based system for ethical decision making
Ritesh Noothigattu, Snehalkumar (Neil) S. Gaikwad, Edmond Awad, Sohan Dsouza, Iyad Rahwan, Pradeep Ravikumar, and Ariel D. Procaccia · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Operationalizing individual fairness with pairwise fair representations
Preethi Lahoti, Krishna P. Gummadi, and Gerhard Weikum · 2019
Closest in time.
How we analyzed the compas recidivism algorithm , Mar 2019
Jeff Larson, Julia Angwin, Lauren Kirchner, and Surya Mattu · 2019
Closest in time.
Webuildai: Participatory framework for algorithmic governance
Min Kyung Lee, Daniel Kusbit, Anson Kahng, Ji Tae Kim, Xinran Yuan, Allissa Chan, Daniel See, Ritesh Noothigattu, Siheon Lee, Alexandros Psomas, and Ariel D. Procaccia · 2019
Closest in time.
Adapting a kidney exchange algorithm to align with human values
Rachel Freedman, Jana Schaich Borg, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, John P. Dickerson, and Vincent Conitzer · 2020
Closest in time.
Participatory approaches to machine learning
Bogdan Kulynych, David Madras, Smitha Milli, Inioluwa Deborah Raji, Angela Zhou, and Richard Zemel · 2020
Closest in time.
Democratizing algorithmic fairness
Pak-Hang Wong · 2020
Closest in time.