Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
A sharper formulation is presented for an interpretation of quantum mechanics advocated by author.
J. S. Bell, On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox , Physics 1
1964
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. Rosen, Can Quantum mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?
1966
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. H. Brans, Bell’s Theorem Does Not Eliminate Fully Causal Hidden Variables
1988
Cited alongside, same era.
J. S. Bell, in Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 232–248 (2004)
2004
Cited alongside, same era.
G. ’t Hooft, The emergence of Quantum Mechanics, FFP11, Paris. ITP-UU-10/44, Spin-10/37
Cited in the paper.
G. ’t Hooft, Physics on the Boundary between Classical and Quantum Mechanics. Presented at EmQM13, Vienna, October 2013, J. Phys: Conference Series 504 (2014) 012003; doi:10.1088/1742-6596/504/1/012003 rept # ITP-UU-14/06, SPIN-14/06
2014
Later among the works it cites.
2016
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…