Built on

D. Karateev, P. Kravchuk, M. Serone, and A. Vichi, “Fermion Conformal Bootstrap in 4d,” arXiv:1902.05969 [hep-th]
Original
1902
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Ferrara, A. F. Grillo, and R. Gatto, “Tensor representations of conformal algebra and conformally covariant operator product expansion,” Annals Phys
1973
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. M. Polyakov, “Nonhamiltonian approach to conformal quantum field theory,” Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz
1974
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Campostrini, M. Hasenbusch, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, “The Critical exponents of the superfluid transition in He-4,” Phys. Rev
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. F. Alday and J. M. Maldacena, “Comments on operators with large spin,” JHEP
Original
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. S. Costa, J. Penedones, D. Poland, and S. Rychkov, “Spinning Conformal Correlators,” JHEP
Original
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. El-Showk, M. F. Paulos, D. Poland, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, “Solving the 3D Ising Model with the Conformal Bootstrap,” Phys. Rev
Original
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. S. Costa, V. Goncalves, and J. Penedones, “Conformal Regge theory,” JHEP
Original
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Komargodski and A. Zhiboedov, “Convexity and Liberation at Large Spin,” JHEP
Original
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin, “The Analytic Bootstrap and AdS Superhorizon Locality,” JHEP
Original
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Kos, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin, “Bootstrapping the O ⁡ ( N ) O(N) vector models,” JHEP
Original
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Kos, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin, “Bootstrapping Mixed Correlators in the 3D Ising Model,” JHEP
Original
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Kos, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, “Bootstrapping the O(N) Archipelago,” JHEP
Original
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

F. Kos, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, “Precision Islands in the Ising and O ⁡ ( N ) O(N) Models,” JHEP
Original
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
D. Li, D. Meltzer, and D. Poland, “Conformal Collider Physics from the Lightcone Bootstrap,” JHEP
Original
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
D. M. Hofman, D. Li, D. Meltzer, D. Poland, and F. Rejon-Barrera, “A Proof of the Conformal Collider Bounds,” JHEP
Original
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
L. Iliesiu, F. Kos, D. Poland, S. S. Pufu, D. Simmons-Duffin, and R. Yacoby, “Bootstrapping 3D Fermions,” JHEP
Original
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Hogervorst, “Dimensional Reduction for Conformal Blocks,” JHEP

Then

C. Sleight and M. Taronna, “Spinning Mellin Bootstrap: Conformal Partial Waves, Crossing Kernels and Applications,” Fortsch. Phys
Original
2018
Later among the works it cites.
C. Sleight and M. Taronna, “Anomalous Dimensions from Crossing Kernels,” JHEP
Original
2018
Later among the works it cites.
M. Kulaxizi, A. Parnachev, and A. Zhiboedov, “Bulk Phase Shift, CFT Regge Limit and Einstein Gravity,” JHEP
Original
2018
Later among the works it cites.
D. Meltzer and E. Perlmutter, “Beyond a = c a=c : gravitational couplings to matter and the stress tensor OPE,” JHEP
Original
2018
Later among the works it cites.
N. Afkhami-Jeddi, S. Kundu, and A. Tajdini, “A Conformal Collider for Holographic CFTs,” JHEP

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Reading the bibliography…

2019

More Analytic Bootstrap: Nonperturbative Effects and Fermions

Albayrak, Soner, Meltzer, David, Poland, David

Understand

We develop the analytic bootstrap in several directions.

First, we discuss the appearance of nonperturbative effects in the Lorentzian inversion formula, which are exponentially suppressed at large spin but important at finite spin.
We show that these effects are important for precision applications of the analytic bootstrap in the context of the 3d Ising and O(2) models.
In the former they allow us to reproduce the spin-2 stress tensor with error at the $10^{-5}$ level while in the latter requiring that we reproduce the stress tensor allows us to predict the coupling to the leading charge-2 operator.