Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Anomaly detection algorithms are often thought to be limited because they don't facilitate the process of validating results performed by domain experts.
E. H. Shortliffe, B. G. Buchanan, A model of inexact reasoning in medicine, Mathematical biosciences 23 (3-4) (1975) 351–379
1975
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. E. Rumelhart, G. E. Hinton, R. J. Williams, Learning internal representations by error propagation, Tech. rep., California Univ San Diego La Jolla Inst for Cognitive Science (1985)
1985
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Liu, Y. Xia, P. S. Yu, Clustering through decision tree construction, in: Proceedings of the ninth international conference on Information and knowledge management, ACM, 2000, pp. 20–29
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. H. Friedman, Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine, Annals of statistics (2001) 1189–1232
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. R. Radev, H. Jing, M. Styś, D. Tam, Centroid-based summarization of multiple documents, Information Processing & Management 40 (6) (2004) 919–938
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. E. Hinton, R. R. Salakhutdinov, Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks, science 313 (5786) (2006) 504–507
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. E. Hinton, S. Osindero, Y.-W. Teh, A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets, Neural computation 18 (7) (2006) 1527–1554
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Bengio, Y. LeCun, et al., Scaling learning algorithms towards ai, Large-scale kernel machines 34 (5) (2007) 1–41
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. v. d. Maaten, G. Hinton, Visualizing data using t-sne, Journal of machine learning research 9 (Nov) (2008) 2579–2605
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. Jolliffe, Principal component analysis, Springer, 2011
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Sakurada, T. Yairi, Anomaly detection using autoencoders with nonlinear dimensionality reduction, in: Proceedings of the MLSDA 2014 2nd Workshop on Machine Learning for Sensory Data Analysis, ACM, 2014, p. 4
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Palczewska, J. Palczewski, R. M. Robinson, D. Neagu, Interpreting random forest classification models using a feature contribution method, in: Integration of reusable systems, Springer, 2014, pp. 193–218
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Arp, M. Spreitzenbarth, M. Hubner, H. Gascon, K. Rieck, C. Siemens, Drebin: Effective and explainable detection of android malware in your pocket., in: Ndss, Vol. 14, 2014, pp. 23–26
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. T. Ribeiro, S. Singh, C. Guestrin, “why should i trust you?” explaining the predictions of any classifier (2016)
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
M. T. Ribeiro, S. Singh, C. Guestrin, Why should i trust you?: Explaining the predictions of any classifier, in: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, ACM, 2016, pp. 1135–1144
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
S. M. Erfani, S. Rajasegarar, S. Karunasekera, C. Leckie, High-dimensional and large-scale anomaly detection using a linear one-class svm with deep learning, Pattern Recognition 58 (2016) 121–134
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
E. L. Paula, M. Ladeira, R. N. Carvalho, T. Marzagão, Deep learning anomaly detection as support fraud investigation in brazilian exports and anti-money laundering, in: Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), 2016 15th IEEE International Conference on, IEEE, 2016, pp. 954–960
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
T. Miller, Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences, Artificial Intelligence (2018)
2018
Later among the works it cites.
2018
Later among the works it cites.
2018
Later among the works it cites.
2018
Later among the works it cites.
K. Amarasinghe, K. Kenney, M. Manic, Toward explainable deep neural network based anomaly detection, in: 2018 11th International Conference on Human System Interaction (HSI), IEEE, 2018, pp. 311–317
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, A. Courville, Deep learning, MIT press, 2016
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
P.-J. Kindermans, S. Hooker, J. Adebayo, M. Alber, K. T. Schütt, S. Dähne, D. Erhan, B. Kim, The (un) reliability of saliency methods, stat 1050 (2017) 2
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
S. M. Lundberg, S.-I. Lee, A unified approach to interpreting model predictions, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017, pp. 4765–4774
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Shrikumar, P. Greenside, A. Kundaje, Learning important features through propagating activation differences, in: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning-Volume 70, JMLR. org, 2017, pp. 3145–3153
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
D. Bertsimas, J. Dunn, Optimal classification trees, Machine Learning 106 (7) (2017) 1039–1082
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
F. Doshi-Velez, B. Kim, A roadmap for a rigorous science of interpretability, stat 1050 (2017) 28
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Liu, X. Wang, M. Liu, J. Zhu, Towards better analysis of machine learning models: A visual analytics perspective, Visual Informatics 1 (1) (2017) 48–56
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
D. Gunning, Explainable artificial intelligence (xai), Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), nd Web (2017)
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
2018
Later among the works it cites.
N. Liu, D. Shin, X. Hu, Contextual outlier interpretation, in: Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI Press, 2018, pp. 2461–2467
2018
Later among the works it cites.
2018
Later among the works it cites.
D. A. Melis, T. Jaakkola, Towards robust interpretability with self-explaining neural networks, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2018, pp. 7786–7795
2018
Later among the works it cites.
J. R. Goodall, E. D. Ragan, C. A. Steed, J. W. Reed, G. D. Richardson, K. M. Huffer, R. A. Bridges, J. A. Laska, Situ: Identifying and explaining suspicious behavior in networks, IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 25 (1) (2019) 204–214
2019
Closest in time.
N. Takeishi, Shapley values of reconstruction errors of pca for explaining anomaly detection, in: 2019 International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), IEEE, 2019, pp. 793–798
2019
Closest in time.
Q. P. Nguyen, K. W. Lim, D. M. Divakaran, K. H. Low, M. C. Chan, Gee: A gradient-based explainable variational autoencoder for network anomaly detection, in: 2019 IEEE Conference on Communications and Network Security (CNS), IEEE, 2019, pp. 91–99
2019
Closest in time.