Built on

S. Chang and M. A. Luty, The Higgs Trilinear Coupling and the Scale of New Physics , 1902.05556
Original
1902
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. M. Cornwall, D. N. Levin and G. Tiktopoulos, Derivation of Gauge Invariance from High-Energy Unitarity Bounds on the s Matrix , Phys. Rev. D10
1974
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. W. Lee, C. Quigg and H. B. Thacker, Weak Interactions at Very High-Energies: The Role of the Higgs Boson Mass , Phys. Rev. D16
1977
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Manohar and H. Georgi, Chiral Quarks and the Nonrelativistic Quark Model , Nucl. Phys. B234
1984
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian Analysis of New Interactions and Flavor Conservation , Nucl.Phys. B268
1986
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. N. Leung, S. T. Love and S. Rao, Low-Energy Manifestations of a New Interaction Scale: Operator Analysis , Z. Phys. C31
1986
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Kleiss, W. J. Stirling and S. D. Ellis, A New Monte Carlo Treatment of Multiparticle Phase Space at High-energies , Comput. Phys. Commun. 40
1986
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. G. Cohen, D. B. Kaplan and A. E. Nelson, Counting 4 pis in strongly coupled supersymmetry , Phys. Lett. B412
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. A. Luty, Naive dimensional analysis and supersymmetry , Phys. Rev. D57
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Maltoni, J. M. Niczyporuk and S. Willenbrock, The Scale of fermion mass generation , Phys. Rev. D65
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

D. A. Dicus and H.-J. He, Scales of fermion mass generation and electroweak symmetry breaking , Phys. Rev. D71
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
G. Giudice, C. Grojean, A. Pomarol and R. Rattazzi, The Strongly-Interacting Light Higgs , JHEP 0706
2007
Cited alongside, same era.
M. McCullough, An Indirect Model-Dependent Probe of the Higgs Self-Coupling , Phys. Rev. D90
Original
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Galloway, M. A. Luty, Y. Tsai and Y. Zhao, Induced Electroweak Symmetry Breaking and Supersymmetric Naturalness , Phys. Rev. D89
Original
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
V. V. Khoze, Perturbative growth of high-multiplicity W, Z and Higgs production processes at high energies , JHEP 03
Original
2015

Then

R. Contino, A. Falkowski, F. Goertz, C. Grojean and F. Riva, On the Validity of the Effective Field Theory Approach to SM Precision Tests , JHEP 07
Original
2016
Later among the works it cites.
R. Alonso, E. E. Jenkins and A. V. Manohar, Geometry of the Scalar Sector , JHEP 08
Original
2016
Later among the works it cites.
S. Di Vita, C. Grojean, G. Panico, M. Riembau and T. Vantalon, A global view on the Higgs self-coupling , JHEP 09
Original
2017
Later among the works it cites.
F. Maltoni, D. Pagani, A. Shivaji and X. Zhao, Trilinear Higgs coupling determination via single-Higgs differential measurements at the LHC , Eur. Phys. J. C77
Original
2017
Later among the works it cites.
G. Degrassi, M. Fedele and P. P. Giardino, Constraints on the trilinear Higgs self coupling from precision observables , JHEP 04

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Reading the bibliography…

2019

Which EFT

Falkowski, Adam, Rattazzi, Riccardo

Understand

We classify effective field theory (EFT) deformations of the Standard Model (SM) according to the analyticity property of the Lagrangian as a function of the Higgs doublet H.

Our distinction in analytic and non-analytic corresponds to the more familiar one between linearly and non-linearly realized electroweak symmetry, but offers deeper physical insight.
From the UV perspective, non-analyticity occurs when the new states acquire mass from electroweak symmetry breaking, and thus cannot be decoupled to arbitrarily high scales.
This is reflected in the IR by the anomalous growth of the interaction strength for processes involving many Higgs bosons and longitudinally polarized massive vectors, with a breakdown of the EFT description below a scale $O(4 \pi v)$.

Built on

S. Chang and M. A. Luty, The Higgs Trilinear Coupling and the Scale of New Physics , 1902.05556
Original
1902
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. M. Cornwall, D. N. Levin and G. Tiktopoulos, Derivation of Gauge Invariance from High-Energy Unitarity Bounds on the s Matrix , Phys. Rev. D10
1974
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. W. Lee, C. Quigg and H. B. Thacker, Weak Interactions at Very High-Energies: The Role of the Higgs Boson Mass , Phys. Rev. D16
1977
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Manohar and H. Georgi, Chiral Quarks and the Nonrelativistic Quark Model , Nucl. Phys. B234
1984
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian Analysis of New Interactions and Flavor Conservation , Nucl.Phys. B268
1986
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. N. Leung, S. T. Love and S. Rao, Low-Energy Manifestations of a New Interaction Scale: Operator Analysis , Z. Phys. C31
1986
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Kleiss, W. J. Stirling and S. D. Ellis, A New Monte Carlo Treatment of Multiparticle Phase Space at High-energies , Comput. Phys. Commun. 40
1986
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. G. Cohen, D. B. Kaplan and A. E. Nelson, Counting 4 pis in strongly coupled supersymmetry , Phys. Lett. B412
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. A. Luty, Naive dimensional analysis and supersymmetry , Phys. Rev. D57
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Maltoni, J. M. Niczyporuk and S. Willenbrock, The Scale of fermion mass generation , Phys. Rev. D65
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.