Fetching the paper…

Reading the bibliography…

2019

Precision measurement of the branching fractions of $\eta^\prime$ decays

Ablikim, M., Achasov, M. N., Ahmed, S. et al.

Original
PDF
Post on X

Understand

Based on a sample of $(1310.6 \pm 7.0) \times 10^6~J/\psi$ events collected with the BESIII detector, we present measurements of $J/\psi$ and $\eta^\prime$ absolute branching fractions using the process $J/\psi\rightarrow\gamma\eta^\prime$.

By analyzing events where the radiative photon converts into an $e^+e^-$ pair, the branching fraction for $J/\psi \rightarrow \gamma \eta^\prime$ is measured to be $(5.27\pm0.03\pm0.05)\times 10^{-3}$.
The absolute branching fractions of the five dominant decay channels of the $\eta^\prime$ are then measured independently for the first time and are determined to be $\mathcal{B}(\eta^\prime \rightarrow \gamma \pi^{+} \pi^{-})$ = (29.90$\pm$0.03$\pm$0.55)%, $\mathcal{B}(\eta^\prime \rightarrow \eta \pi^{+} \pi^{-})$ = (41.24$\pm$0.08$\pm$1.24)%, $\mathcal{B}(\eta^\prime \rightarrow \eta \pi^{0} \pi^{0})$ = (21.36$\pm$0.10$\pm$0.92)%, $\mathcal{B}(\eta^\prime \rightarrow \gamma \omega)$ = (2.489$\pm$0.018$\pm$0.074)%, and $\mathcal{B}(\eta^\prime \rightarrow \gamma \gamma)$ = (2.331$\pm$0.012$\pm$0.035)%, where the first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic.

Precision measurement of the branching fractions of $\eta^\prime$ decays · Around

Built on

J. Wess and B. Zumino, Phys. Lett. 37B
1971
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 223
1983
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. G. Landsberg, Phys. Rept. 128
1985
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Faessler et al
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. C. Chen, G. S. Huang, X. R. Qi, D. H. Zhang and Y. S. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 62
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. J. Lange, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 462
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Beisert et al
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Agostinelli et al
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Borasoy et al
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Borasoy et al
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Borasoy et al
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

M. Ablikim et al
2006
Cited alongside, same era.
V. Dorofeev et al
2007
Cited alongside, same era.
R. G. Ping, Chin. Phys. C 32
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
T. K. Pedlar et al
2009
Cited alongside, same era.
A. M. Blik et al
2009
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Ablikim et al
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Ablikim et al
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
Z. R. Xu and K. L. He, Chin. Phys. C 36
2012
Cited alongside, same era.

Then

M. Goodarzi et al
2014
Later among the works it cites.
M. Ablikim et al
2014
Later among the works it cites.
M. Ablikim et al
2015
Later among the works it cites.
M. Ablikim et al
2016
Later among the works it cites.
M. Ablikim et al
2017
Later among the works it cites.
M. Ablikim et al
2017
Later among the works it cites.
M. Ablikim et al
2017
Later among the works it cites.
M. Tanabashi et al
2018
Later among the works it cites.

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

F. K. Guo, B. Kubis and A. Wirzba, Phys. Rev. D 85

2012

Cited alongside, same era.

M. Ablikim et al

2013

Cited alongside, same era.

M. Ablikim et al

2013

Cited alongside, same era.

T. Petri, arXiv:1010.2378 [nucl-th]

Cited in the paper.

M. Ablikim et al

2018

Later among the works it cites.

M. Ablikim et al

2018

Later among the works it cites.