Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
We present a twistor-like formula for the complete tree-level S matrix of 6D $(2,0)$ supergravity coupled to $21$ abelian tensor multiplets.
S. L. Adler, “Consistency conditions on the strong interactions implied by a partially conserved axial vector current,” Phys. Rev. 137
1965
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Witten, “Perturbative gauge theory as a string theory in twistor space,” Commun. Math. Phys. 252
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Roiban, M. Spradlin and A. Volovich, “On the tree level S matrix of Yang-Mills theory,” Phys. Rev. D 70
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Cheung and D. O’Connell, “Amplitudes and Spinor-Helicity in Six Dimensions,” JHEP 0907
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Arkani-Hamed, F. Cachazo and J. Kaplan, “What is the Simplest Quantum Field Theory?,” JHEP 1009
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Elvang, Y. t. Huang and C. Peng, JHEP 1109
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Cachazo, S. He and E. Y. Yuan, “Scattering in Three Dimensions from Rational Maps,” JHEP 1310
2013
Cited alongside, same era.
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Volovich, C. Wen and M. Zlotnikov, “Double Soft Theorems in Gauge and String Theories,” JHEP 1507
2015
Later among the works it cites.
M. Heydeman, J. H. Schwarz and C. Wen, “M5-Brane and D-Brane Scattering Amplitudes,” JHEP 1712
2017
Later among the works it cites.
S. Mizera and G. Zhang, “A String Deformation of the Parke-Taylor Factor,” Phys. Rev. D 96
2017
Later among the works it cites.
2018
Closest in time.
Y. t. Huang, “Non-Chiral S-Matrix of N=4 Super Yang-Mills,” arXiv:1104.2021 [hep-th]
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
E. Witten, ‘Some comments on string dynamics,” hep-th/9507121
Cited in the paper.
The string-theory moduli space has singularities at fixed points of its S O ( 5 , 21 , ℤ ) SO(5,21;\mathbb{Z}) duality group. At such points one or more tensor multiplets are replaced by non-Lagrangian ( 2 , 0 ) (2,0) CFTs, and a perturbative analysis is no longer possible. Therefore, the amplitudes presented in this article are applicable at generic points in the moduli space where we can treat the tensor multiplets as abelian
Cited in the paper.
For the superfield of the tensor, Φ ( η ) \Phi(\eta) , one may choose different I , J I,J ; however, only the case of I = 1 , J = 2 I=1,J=2 leads to non-vanishing results when we integrate away η ~ \tilde{\eta} ’s from the amplitudes of ( 2 , 2 ) (2,2) supergravity
Cited in the paper.
The identity may be understood by studying the zeros and singularities on both sides of the equation, we have also checked it explicitly up to n = 12 n=12
Cited in the paper.
It should be emphasized that the artificial difference between the formulas of even- and odd-point amplitudes is due to the peculiar property of 6D scattering equations in the rational map form, not specific to the chiral ( 2 , 0 ) (2,0) supergravity we consider in this article
Cited in the paper.
P. S. Aspinwall, “K3 surfaces and string duality,” [hep-th/9611137]
Cited in the paper.
2021
Closest in time.