Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) have been broadly used as a hybrid quantum-classical machine learning scheme to accomplish generative tasks.
David H Ackley, Geoffrey E Hinton, and Terrence J Sejnowski, “A learning algorithm for boltzmann machines,” Cognitive science 9
1985
Earlier work this paper cites.
David E Rumelhart, Geoffrey E Hinton, and Ronald J Williams, Learning internal representations by error propagation , Tech. Rep. (California Univ San Diego La Jolla Inst for Cognitive Science, 1985)
1985
Earlier work this paper cites.
Peter C Cheeseman, Matthew Self, James Kelly, Will Taylor, Don Freeman, and John C Stutz, “Bayesian classification.” in AAAI , Vol. 88 (1988) pp. 607–611
1988
Earlier work this paper cites.
Adriano Barenco, Charles H Bennett, Richard Cleve, David P DiVincenzo, Norman Margolus, Peter Shor, Tycho Sleator, John A Smolin, and Harald Weinfurter, “Elementary gates for quantum computation,” Physical Review A 52
1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ethan Bernstein and Umesh Vazirani, “Quantum complexity theory,” SIAM Journal on Computing 26
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
John Platt et al. , “Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparisons to regularized likelihood methods,” Advances in Large Margin Classifiers 10
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
Thomas G Dietterich, “Ensemble methods in machine learning,” in International Workshop on Multiple Classifier Systems (Springer, 2000) pp. 1–15
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
Michael E Tipping, “Sparse bayesian learning and the relevance vector machine,” Journal of Machine Learning Research 1
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Andrew Y Ng and Michael I Jordan, “On discriminative vs. generative classifiers: A comparison of logistic regression and naive bayes,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2002) pp. 841–848
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Sugato Basu, Arindam Banerjee, and Raymond Mooney, “Semi-supervised clustering by seeding,” in In Proceedings of 19th International Conference on Machine Learning (Citeseer, 2002)
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Charles Kemp, Thomas L Griffiths, Sean Stromsten, and Joshua B Tenenbaum, “Semi-supervised learning with trees,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2004) pp. 257–264
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Geoffrey E Hinton and Ruslan R Salakhutdinov, “Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks,” science 313
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Guifre Vidal, “Entanglement renormalization,” Physical Review Letters 99
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Li Fei-Fei, Rob Fergus, and Pietro Perona, “Learning generative visual models from few training examples: An incremental bayesian approach tested on 101 object categories,” Computer vision and Image Understanding 106
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Thomas Hofmann, Bernhard Schölkopf, and Alexander J Smola, “Kernel methods in machine learning,” The Annals of Statistics , 1171–1220 (2008)
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Norbert Schuch, Michael M Wolf, Frank Verstraete, and J Ignacio Cirac, “Simulation of quantum many-body systems with strings of operators and monte carlo tensor contractions,” Physical Review Letters 100
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Dan Shepherd and Michael J Bremner, “Temporally unstructured quantum computation,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 465
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ruslan Salakhutdinov and Hugo Larochelle, “Efficient learning of deep boltzmann machines,” in Proceedings of the thirteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics (2010) pp. 693–700
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Jens Eisert, Marcus Cramer, and Martin B Plenio, “Colloquium: Area laws for the entanglement entropy,” Reviews of Modern Physics 82
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Michael J Bremner, Richard Jozsa, and Dan J Shepherd, “Classical simulation of commuting quantum computations implies collapse of the polynomial hierarchy,” in Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences (The Royal Society, 2010) p. rspa20100301
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Vinod Nair and Geoffrey E Hinton, “Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines,” in Proceedings of The 27th International Conference on Machine Learning (2010) pp. 807–814
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Michael A Nielsen and Isaac L Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, 2010)
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
Scott Aaronson and Alex Arkhipov, “The computational complexity of linear optics,” Proceedings of The Forty-third Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing , 333–342 (2011)
2011
Cited alongside, same era.
Ulrich Schollwöck, “The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states,” Annals of Physics 326
2011
Cited alongside, same era.
Alain Berlinet and Christine Thomas-Agnan, Reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces in probability and statistics (Springer Science & Business Media, 2011)
2011
Cited alongside, same era.
Nathan Wiebe, Daniel Braun, and Seth Lloyd, “Quantum algorithm for data fitting,” Physical Review Letters 109
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
Xun Gao and Lu-Ming Duan, “Efficient representation of quantum many-body states with deep neural networks,” Nature Communications 8
2017
Later among the works it cites.
Dong-Ling Deng, Xiaopeng Li, and S Das Sarma, “Quantum entanglement in neural network states,” Physical Review X 7
2017
Later among the works it cites.
Juan Carrasquilla and Roger G Melko, “Machine learning phases of matter,” Nature Physics 13
2017
Later among the works it cites.
Giuseppe Carleo and Matthias Troyer, “Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks,” Science 355
2017
Later among the works it cites.
Junwei Liu, Huitao Shen, Yang Qi, Zi Yang Meng, and Liang Fu, “Self-learning monte carlo method and cumulative update in fermion systems,” Physical Review B 95
2017
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2013
Cited alongside, same era.
Patrick Rebentrost, Masoud Mohseni, and Seth Lloyd, “Quantum support vector machine for big data classification,” Physical Review Letters 113
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Seth Lloyd, Masoud Mohseni, and Patrick Rebentrost, “Quantum principal component analysis,” Nature Physics 10
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Peter Wittek, Quantum machine learning: what quantum computing means to data mining (Academic Press, 2014)
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Giuseppe Davide Paparo, Vedran Dunjko, Adi Makmal, Miguel Angel Martin-Delgado, and Hans J Briegel, “Quantum speedup for active learning agents,” Physical Review X 4
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Diederik P Kingma, Shakir Mohamed, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Max Welling, “Semi-supervised learning with deep generative models,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2014) pp. 3581–3589
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Zoubin Ghahramani, “Probabilistic machine learning and artificial intelligence,” Nature 521
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Evert PL Van Nieuwenburg, Ye-Hua Liu, and Sebastian D Huber, “Learning phase transitions by confusion,” Nature Physics 13
2017
Later among the works it cites.
Kelvin Ch’ng, Juan Carrasquilla, Roger G Melko, and Ehsan Khatami, “Machine learning phases of strongly correlated fermions,” Physical Review X 7
2017
Later among the works it cites.
Marcello Benedetti, John Realpe-Gómez, Rupak Biswas, and Alejandro Perdomo-Ortiz, “Quantum-assisted learning of hardware-embedded probabilistic graphical models,” Physical Review X 7
2017
Later among the works it cites.
2017
Later among the works it cites.
2018
Closest in time.
Jing Chen, Song Cheng, Haidong Xie, Lei Wang, and Tao Xiang, “Equivalence of restricted boltzmann machines and tensor network states,” Physical Review B 97
2018
Closest in time.
2018
Closest in time.
2018
Closest in time.
2018
Closest in time.
2018
Closest in time.
2018
Closest in time.
2018
Closest in time.
2018
Closest in time.
Sergio Boixo, Sergei V Isakov, Vadim N Smelyanskiy, Ryan Babbush, Nan Ding, Zhang Jiang, Michael J Bremner, John M Martinis, and Hartmut Neven, “Characterizing quantum supremacy in near-term devices,” Nature Physics 14
2018
Closest in time.